Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CPS vs SMP vs STRT vs THRM vs MFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Financial - Credit Services
CPS vs SMP vs STRT vs THRM vs MFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $542M | $871M | $312M | $944M | $225M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $688.43B | $1.83B | $580M | $1.53B | $353M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33.31B | $46M | $25M | $23M | $47M |
| Gross Margin | 12.0% | 30.6% | 16.8% | 23.6% | 96.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 10.1% | 5.0% | 4.7% | 50.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 8.9x | 11.9x | 11.6x | 8.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.26B | $682M | $11M | $295M | $316M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $198M | $72M | $85M | $161M | $202M |
CPS vs SMP vs STRT vs THRM vs MFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper-Standard Hol… (CPS) | 100 | 290.8 | +190.8% |
| Standard Motor Prod… (SMP) | 100 | 92.5 | -7.5% |
| Strattec Security C… (STRT) | 100 | 578.0 | +478.0% |
| Gentherm Incorporat… (THRM) | 100 | 75.7 | -24.3% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPS vs SMP vs STRT vs THRM vs MFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SMP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.4%, EPS growth -23.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- 22.4% revenue growth vs CPS's 0.4%
- Beta 0.81 vs STRT's 1.53
- 3.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MFIN's 4.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
STRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +120.7% vs MFIN's +8.2%
- 6.4% ROA vs CPS's -7.2%, ROIC 8.7% vs 8.6%
Among these 5 stocks, THRM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MFIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 4.7%
- 60.3% 10Y total return vs STRT's 49.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 62.3%, current ratio 27.10x
- Beta 1.15, yield 4.7%, current ratio 27.10x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.4% revenue growth vs CPS's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 11.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs CPS's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs STRT's 1.53 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MFIN's 4.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +120.7% vs MFIN's +8.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs CPS's -7.2%, ROIC 8.7% vs 8.6% |
CPS vs SMP vs STRT vs THRM vs MFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CPS vs SMP vs STRT vs THRM vs MFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
STRT leads 2 • CPS leads 0 • SMP leads 0 • THRM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $688.4B annually — 1948.5x MFIN's $353M. MFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPS's -4.8%. On growth, CPS holds the edge at +1027.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $688.4B | $1.8B | $580M | $1.5B | $353M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $210M | $229M | $33M | $127M | $111M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33.3B | $46M | $25M | $23M | $47M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$93.1B | $39M | $58M | $79M | $126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +30.6% | +16.8% | +23.6% | +96.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +10.1% | +5.0% | +4.7% | +50.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +2.5% | +4.3% | +1.5% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | +2.2% | +10.0% | +5.1% | +35.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1027.9% | +9.1% | -4.5% | +11.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.4% | +33.9% | -41.7% | — | +16.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 90% valuation discount to THRM's 51.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFIN's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than THRM's 8.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $542M | $871M | $312M | $944M | $225M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $1.5B | $238M | $1.1B | $340M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -132.65x | 21.38x | 16.28x | 51.35x | 5.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.88x | 8.95x | 11.91x | 11.57x | 7.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.84x | 6.50x | 6.35x | 8.21x | 1.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.49x | 0.55x | 0.63x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.27x | 1.23x | 1.32x | 0.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.34x | 46.55x | 4.83x | 15.45x | 1.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STRT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STRT delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $3 for THRM. STRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMP's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMP scores 7/9 vs CPS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.6% | +9.7% | +3.2% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.2% | +2.3% | +6.4% | +1.6% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +10.8% | +8.7% | +7.3% | +17.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +12.8% | +8.8% | +8.2% | +10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.98x | 0.05x | 0.41x | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $610M | -$73M | $134M | $115M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $198M | $72M | $85M | $161M | $202M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $682M | $11M | $295M | $316M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.91x | 5.79x | 263.01x | 5.83x | 1.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRT five years ago would be worth $16,680 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,200 for THRM. Over the past 12 months, STRT leads with a +120.7% total return vs MFIN's +8.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRT at 58.7% vs THRM's -19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.4% | +7.0% | -1.9% | -16.3% | -4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.6% | +44.7% | +120.7% | +19.1% | +8.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +165.3% | +16.9% | +299.4% | -48.0% | +58.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.5% | -5.3% | +66.8% | -58.0% | +23.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.7% | +29.9% | +49.3% | -14.9% | +60.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.4% | +5.3% | +58.7% | -19.6% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMP and MFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMP is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STRT's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MFIN currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs CPS's 63.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 0.81x | 1.53x | 1.43x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.77 | $46.00 | $92.50 | $39.48 | $11.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.32 | $27.91 | $33.50 | $25.47 | $7.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.9% | +85.5% | +80.6% | +78.0% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 57.1 | 48.1 | 59.7 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 198K | 120K | 85K | 239K | 59K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SMP and MFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CPS as "Hold", SMP as "Buy", STRT as "Hold", THRM as "Buy", MFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 80.3% upside for CPS (target: $55) vs 19.0% for THRM (target: $37). For income investors, MFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.73% vs SMP's 3.08%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.00 | — | — | $36.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 12 | 1 | 15 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.1% | — | — | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.21 | — | — | $0.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.1% | +0.4% |
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). STRT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
CPS vs SMP vs STRT vs THRM vs MFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPS or SMP or STRT or THRM or MFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the stronger pick with 22. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (CPS). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Standard Motor Products, Inc. (SMP) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPS or SMP or STRT or THRM or MFIN?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Gentherm Incorporated at 51. 4x. On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPS or SMP or STRT or THRM or MFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) delivered a total return of +66.
8%, compared to -58. 0% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MFIN returned +60. 3% versus CPS's -63. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPS or SMP or STRT or THRM or MFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Strattec Security Corporation's 1. 53β — meaning STRT is approximately 88% more volatile than SMP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 98% for Standard Motor Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPS or SMP or STRT or THRM or MFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is pulling ahead at 22. 4% versus 0. 4% for Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (CPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. grew EPS 94. 9% year-over-year, compared to -70. 9% for Gentherm Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMP leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPS or SMP or STRT or THRM or MFIN?
Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus -0. 2% for Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus 3. 9% for CPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPS or SMP or STRT or THRM or MFIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Strattec Security Corporation — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPS: 80. 3% to $55. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPS or SMP or STRT or THRM or MFIN?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
7% yield), SMP (3. 1% yield) pay a dividend. CPS, STRT, THRM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CPS or SMP or STRT or THRM or MFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 1% yield). Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (CPS) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMP: +29. 9%, CPS: -63. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPS and SMP and STRT and THRM and MFIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CPS (Consumer Cyclical) and SMP (Consumer Cyclical) and STRT (Consumer Cyclical) and THRM (Consumer Cyclical) and MFIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; STRT is a small-cap deep-value stock; THRM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. SMP, MFIN pay a dividend while CPS, STRT, THRM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.