Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CREG vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PESI vs LUMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Telecommunications Services
Waste Management
Telecommunications Services
CREG vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PESI vs LUMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services | Waste Management | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $1M | $519M | $817M | $207M | $8.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $83K | $136M | $949M | $59M | $12.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-9M | $-170M | $-18M | $-1.74B |
| Gross Margin | -30.9% | 37.2% | 32.4% | 4.1% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | -32.9% | 1.4% | -7.9% | -26.3% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 72.1x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $9M | $2.93B | $4M | $17.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25K | $21M | $205M | $12M | $1.00B |
CREG vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PESI vs LUMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 271.1 | +171.1% |
| Cogent Communicatio… (CCOI) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREG vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PESI vs LUMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CREG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and efficiency.
- Better valuation composite
- -2.3% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC -0.7% vs -21.7%
CLFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.79, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 5.42x
- 19.6% revenue growth vs CREG's -180.7%
- -6.3% margin vs CREG's -36.2%
CCOI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.67, yield 19.2%
- Beta 1.67, yield 19.2%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 1.67 vs LUMN's 2.74
- 19.2% yield, vs LUMN's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth 43.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.4%
- 178.6% 10Y total return vs CLFD's 106.7%
LUMN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.0% vs CREG's -92.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% revenue growth vs CREG's -180.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.3% margin vs CREG's -36.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.67 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 19.2% yield, vs LUMN's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.0% vs CREG's -92.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.3% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC -0.7% vs -21.7% |
CREG vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PESI vs LUMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CREG vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PESI vs LUMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLFD leads in 2 of 6 categories
LUMN leads 1 • CREG leads 0 • CCOI leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLFD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 146295.8x CREG's $82,839. CLFD is the more profitable business, keeping -6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CREG's -36.2%. On growth, CCOI holds the edge at -3.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $82,839 | $136M | $949M | $59M | $12.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $6M | $174M | -$14M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$9M | -$170M | -$18M | -$1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51M | $15M | -$208M | -$14M | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -30.9% | +37.2% | +32.4% | +4.1% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.9% | +1.4% | -7.9% | -26.3% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.2% | -6.3% | -17.9% | -30.1% | -14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +614.8% | +10.8% | -21.9% | -23.4% | +44.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -27.1% | -3.2% | -20.1% | -8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.1% | -142.5% | +23.9% | -110.5% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CREG and LUMN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LUMN's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 61.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $519M | $817M | $207M | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $506M | $3.5B | $200M | $25.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | -64.64x | -4.29x | -14.89x | -4.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 72.10x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 61.46x | 21.30x | — | 9.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.46x | 0.84x | 3.36x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 2.05x | — | 4.11x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.45x | 21.01x | — | — | 23.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLFD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CREG delivers a -2.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CCOI. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PESI's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs CREG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -3.4% | -2.3% | -34.5% | -79.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -3.0% | -5.4% | -20.2% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | +0.6% | -3.1% | -21.7% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.0% | +0.8% | -3.6% | -16.7% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.03x | — | 0.09x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | -$13M | $2.7B | -$7M | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25,341 | $21M | $205M | $12M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $9M | $2.9B | $4M | $17.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.29x | 85.32x | -0.52x | -42.14x | -1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52 for CREG. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs CREG's -92.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs CREG's -69.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -65.2% | +27.1% | -20.8% | -8.8% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.8% | +20.2% | -65.4% | +26.2% | +100.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | +3.9% | -60.0% | +21.7% | +267.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -4.1% | -57.6% | +45.6% | -28.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +106.7% | +13.1% | +178.6% | -35.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -69.0% | +1.3% | -26.3% | +6.8% | +54.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLFD and CCOI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCOI is the less volatile stock with a 1.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLFD currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs CREG's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.79x | 1.67x | 1.85x | 2.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.70 | $46.76 | $55.24 | $16.50 | $11.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.19 | $24.01 | $14.82 | $8.02 | $3.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.2% | +80.2% | +29.5% | +67.7% | +70.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 57.1 | 34.3 | 41.5 | 73.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.9M | 146K | 1.2M | 164K | 12.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CCOI and PESI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLFD as "Buy", CCOI as "Hold", PESI as "Hold", LUMN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 68.5% upside for CCOI (target: $28) vs -16.3% for LUMN (target: $7). CCOI is the only dividend payer here at 19.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.00 | $27.50 | $18.00 | $7.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 32 | 1 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +19.2% | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.13 | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLFD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LUMN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
CREG vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PESI vs LUMN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREG or CLFD or CCOI or PESI or LUMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is the stronger pick with 19. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 8% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI). Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CREG or CLFD or CCOI or PESI or LUMN?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -99. 5% for Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PESI returned +178. 6% versus CREG's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CREG or CLFD or CCOI or PESI or LUMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
(CCOI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 67β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately 64% more volatile than CCOI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 9% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CREG or CLFD or CCOI or PESI or LUMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is pulling ahead at 19. 6% versus -5. 8% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCOI leads at 17. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CREG or CLFD or CCOI or PESI or LUMN?
Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is the more profitable company, earning -5. 4% net margin versus -36. 2% for Smart Powerr Corp. — meaning it keeps -5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLFD leads at 1. 4% versus -32. 9% for CREG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LUMN leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CREG or CLFD or CCOI or PESI or LUMN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCOI: 68.
5% to $27. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — CREG or CLFD or CCOI or PESI or LUMN?
In this comparison, CCOI (19.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CREG, CLFD, PESI, LUMN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CREG or CLFD or CCOI or PESI or LUMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
(CCOI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (19. 2% yield). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCOI: +13. 1%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CREG and CLFD and CCOI and PESI and LUMN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CREG (Utilities) and CLFD (Technology) and CCOI (Communication Services) and PESI (Industrials) and LUMN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CREG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; CCOI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CCOI pays a dividend while CREG, CLFD, PESI, LUMN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 19%
- Dividend Yield > 7.6%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.