Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CREG vs GE vs RTX vs PESI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Waste Management
CREG vs GE vs RTX vs PESI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $1M | $316.20B | $238.07B | $207M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $83K | $48.35B | $90.37B | $59M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $8.66B | $7.26B | $-18M |
| Gross Margin | -30.9% | 34.8% | 20.2% | 4.1% |
| Operating Margin | -32.9% | 18.5% | 10.4% | -26.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.0x | 25.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $20.49B | $39.51B | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25K | $12.39B | $7.43B | $12M |
CREG vs GE vs RTX vs PESI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 925.2 | +825.2% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 274.0 | +174.0% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREG vs GE vs RTX vs PESI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CREG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.83, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 9.25x
GE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 36.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs CREG's -180.7%
- 17.9% margin vs CREG's -36.2%
- +44.9% vs CREG's -92.8%
RTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 1.5%
- 234.7% 10Y total return vs GE's 121.0%
- Beta 0.51, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.03x
- Better valuation composite
PESI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs CREG's -180.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs CREG's -36.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GE's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.9% vs CREG's -92.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 24.7% vs -21.7% |
CREG vs GE vs RTX vs PESI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CREG vs GE vs RTX vs PESI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GE leads in 3 of 6 categories
RTX leads 2 • CREG leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $90.4B annually — 1090947.5x CREG's $82,839. GE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CREG's -36.2%. On growth, GE holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $82,839 | $48.4B | $90.4B | $59M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $9.9B | $13.8B | -$14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $8.7B | $7.3B | -$18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51M | $7.5B | $8.4B | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -30.9% | +34.8% | +20.2% | +4.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.9% | +18.5% | +10.4% | -26.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.2% | +17.9% | +8.0% | -30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +614.8% | +15.4% | +9.2% | -23.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +24.7% | +8.7% | -20.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.1% | -1.1% | +32.5% | -110.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.6x trailing earnings, RTX trades at a 4% valuation discount to GE's 37.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RTX's 21.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GE's 32.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $316.2B | $238.1B | $207M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $324.3B | $270.1B | $200M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | 37.09x | 35.64x | -14.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.02x | 25.54x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.14x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 32.46x | 20.96x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.90x | 2.69x | 3.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 17.09x | 3.57x | 4.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.45x | 43.53x | 29.98x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GE delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. CREG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GE's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs CREG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | +45.8% | +10.9% | -34.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | +6.8% | +4.3% | -20.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | +24.7% | +6.7% | -21.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.0% | +9.6% | +7.9% | -16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 1.08x | 0.59x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $8.1B | $32.1B | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25,341 | $12.4B | $7.4B | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $20.5B | $39.5B | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.29x | 11.69x | 5.58x | -42.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GE five years ago would be worth $46,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52 for CREG. Over the past 12 months, GE leads with a +44.9% total return vs CREG's -92.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GE at 56.0% vs CREG's -69.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -65.2% | -5.5% | -5.2% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.8% | +44.9% | +40.8% | +26.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | +280.0% | +93.0% | +21.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | +362.5% | +120.1% | +45.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +121.0% | +234.7% | +178.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -69.0% | +56.0% | +24.5% | +6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GE and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GE currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs CREG's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.14x | 0.51x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.70 | $348.48 | $214.50 | $16.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.19 | $208.22 | $126.03 | $8.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.2% | +86.8% | +82.4% | +67.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 56.4 | 37.3 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.9M | 5.7M | 5.3M | 164K |
Analyst Outlook
RTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GE as "Buy", RTX as "Buy", PESI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 27.2% for RTX (target: $225). For income investors, RTX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.49% vs GE's 0.45%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $386.20 | $224.89 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 | 26 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +1.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.36 | $2.63 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
GE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RTX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CREG vs GE vs RTX vs PESI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREG or GE or RTX or PESI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). RTX Corporation (RTX) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (25. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Aerospace (GE) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CREG or GE or RTX or PESI?
On trailing P/E, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the cheapest at 35.
6x versus GE Aerospace at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, RTX Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CREG or GE or RTX or PESI?
Over the past 5 years, GE Aerospace (GE) delivered a total return of +362.
5%, compared to -99. 5% for Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RTX returned +234. 7% versus CREG's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CREG or GE or RTX or PESI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RTX Corporation (RTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 262% more volatile than RTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 108% for GE Aerospace — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CREG or GE or RTX or PESI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Aerospace (GE) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -89. 6% for Smart Powerr Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CREG or GE or RTX or PESI?
GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus -36. 2% for Smart Powerr Corp. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GE leads at 19. 1% versus -32. 9% for CREG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GE leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CREG or GE or RTX or PESI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RTX Corporation (RTX) trades at 25.
5x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for GE Aerospace — 14. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CREG or GE or RTX or PESI?
In this comparison, RTX (1.
5% yield), GE (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. CREG, PESI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CREG or GE or RTX or PESI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 1. 5% yield, +234. 7% 10Y return). Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RTX: +234. 7%, CREG: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CREG and GE and RTX and PESI?
These companies operate in different sectors (CREG (Utilities) and GE (Industrials) and RTX (Industrials) and PESI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CREG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RTX pays a dividend while CREG, GE, PESI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.