Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CREG vs PESI vs NRGV vs AMRC vs CDTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Renewable Utilities
Engineering & Construction
Biotechnology
CREG vs PESI vs NRGV vs AMRC vs CDTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Waste Management | Renewable Utilities | Engineering & Construction | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1M | $207M | $716M | $1.57B | $6.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $83K | $59M | $217M | $1.98B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-18M | $-115M | $31M | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | -30.9% | 4.1% | 22.1% | 15.6% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -32.9% | -26.3% | -35.8% | 6.3% | -138.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 25.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $4M | $95M | $1.95B | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25K | $12M | $58M | $72M | $190M |
CREG vs PESI vs NRGV vs AMRC vs CDTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 152.4 | +52.4% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 42.7 | -57.3% |
| Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) | 100 | 61.0 | -39.0% |
| Cidara Therapeutics… (CDTX) | 100 | 415.2 | +315.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREG vs PESI vs NRGV vs AMRC vs CDTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CREG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, PESI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NRGV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs CREG's -180.7%
AMRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- 1.6% margin vs CDTX's -133.2%
- 0.7% ROA vs NRGV's -40.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs -49.5%
CDTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.87
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 2.2%, current ratio 4.25x
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 4.25x
- Beta 0.87 vs NRGV's 3.08, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs CREG's -180.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.6% margin vs CDTX's -133.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs NRGV's 3.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.7% vs CREG's -92.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.7% ROA vs NRGV's -40.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs -49.5% |
CREG vs PESI vs NRGV vs AMRC vs CDTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CREG vs PESI vs NRGV vs AMRC vs CDTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CDTX leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMRC leads 1 • CREG leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • NRGV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CREG and AMRC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMRC and CDTX operate at a comparable scale, with $2.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. AMRC is the more profitable business, keeping 1.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDTX's -133.2%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $82,839 | $59M | $217M | $2.0B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$14M | -$72M | $204M | -$195M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$18M | -$115M | $31M | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51M | -$14M | -$98M | -$251M | -$133M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -30.9% | +4.1% | +22.1% | +15.6% | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.9% | -26.3% | -35.8% | +6.3% | -138.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.2% | -30.1% | -53.0% | +1.6% | -133.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +614.8% | -23.4% | -45.2% | -12.7% | -138.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -20.1% | +156.4% | +13.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.1% | -110.5% | -42.9% | -2.5% | -30.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CREG and PESI and AMRC each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $207M | $716M | $1.6B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $200M | $752M | $3.4B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | -14.89x | -6.37x | 35.76x | -8.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 25.04x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 15.00x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.36x | 3.52x | 0.81x | 5460.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 4.11x | 7.50x | 1.41x | 8.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.45x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMRC delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. CDTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRC's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PESI scores 5/9 vs CREG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -34.5% | -146.8% | +2.9% | -43.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -20.2% | -40.3% | +0.7% | -35.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | -21.7% | -49.5% | +3.3% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.0% | -16.7% | -53.7% | +3.7% | -2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.09x | 1.07x | 1.73x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | -$7M | $36M | $1.9B | -$186M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25,341 | $12M | $58M | $72M | $190M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $4M | $95M | $1.9B | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.29x | -42.14x | -10.33x | 1.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CDTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CDTX five years ago would be worth $55,070 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52 for CREG. Over the past 12 months, CDTX leads with a +1066.4% total return vs CREG's -92.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDTX at 118.6% vs CREG's -69.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -65.2% | -8.8% | -15.3% | -3.2% | +0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.8% | +26.2% | +447.1% | +134.3% | +1066.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | +21.7% | +140.7% | -29.9% | +944.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | +45.6% | -57.7% | -44.0% | +450.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +178.6% | -57.1% | +542.4% | -16.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -69.0% | +6.8% | +34.0% | -11.2% | +118.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CDTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CDTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRGV's 3.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDTX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs CREG's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.85x | 3.08x | 2.03x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.70 | $16.50 | $6.35 | $44.93 | $221.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.19 | $8.02 | $0.65 | $12.37 | $18.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.2% | +67.7% | +65.2% | +66.1% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 41.5 | 53.3 | 68.0 | 84.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.9M | 164K | 3.7M | 507K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", NRGV as "Buy", AMRC as "Buy", CDTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $2.75 | $43.17 | $221.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 7 | 23 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CDTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). AMRC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CREG vs PESI vs NRGV vs AMRC vs CDTX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREG or PESI or NRGV or AMRC or CDTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -94. 5% for Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (CDTX). Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) offers the better valuation at 35. 8x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CREG or PESI or NRGV or AMRC or CDTX?
Over the past 5 years, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.
(CDTX) delivered a total return of +450. 7%, compared to -99. 5% for Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMRC returned +542. 4% versus CREG's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CREG or PESI or NRGV or AMRC or CDTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.
(CDTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 08β — meaning NRGV is approximately 256% more volatile than CDTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (CDTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CREG or PESI or NRGV or AMRC or CDTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -94. 5% for Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (CDTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -409. 5% for Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NRGV leads at 11. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CREG or PESI or NRGV or AMRC or CDTX?
Ameresco, Inc.
(AMRC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 3% net margin versus -133. 2% for Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMRC leads at 6. 5% versus -138. 1% for CDTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDTX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CREG or PESI or NRGV or AMRC or CDTX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61.
1% to $18. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CREG or PESI or NRGV or AMRC or CDTX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CREG or PESI or NRGV or AMRC or CDTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.
(CDTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) carries a higher beta of 3. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CDTX: -16. 0%, NRGV: -57. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CREG and PESI and NRGV and AMRC and CDTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (CREG (Utilities) and PESI (Industrials) and NRGV (Utilities) and AMRC (Industrials) and CDTX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CREG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.