Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CREVW vs CREV vs THRM vs MPAA vs FOXF

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CREVW
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap
5Y Perf.-93.8%
CREV
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$775K
5Y Perf.-98.8%
THRM
Gentherm Incorporated

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$944M
5Y Perf.-22.3%
MPAA
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$220M
5Y Perf.+36.7%
FOXF
Fox Factory Holding Corp.

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$779M
5Y Perf.-76.3%

CREVW vs CREV vs THRM vs MPAA vs FOXF — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CREVW logoCREVW
CREV logoCREV
THRM logoTHRM
MPAA logoMPAA
FOXF logoFOXF
IndustryAuto - PartsAuto - PartsAuto - PartsAuto - PartsAuto - Parts
Market Cap$775K$944M$220M$779M
Revenue (TTM)$71M$58M$1.53B$771M$1.48B
Net Income (TTM)$-221M$-46M$23M$2M$-300M
Gross Margin-155.1%-40.2%23.6%19.2%29.7%
Operating Margin-235.9%-63.3%4.7%6.1%-18.0%
Forward P/E11.6x15.3x18.4x
Total Debt$111M$111M$295M$201M$780M
Cash & Equiv.$4M$4M$161M$9M$58M

CREVW vs CREV vs THRM vs MPAA vs FOXFLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CREVW
CREV
THRM
MPAA
FOXF
StockNov 23Apr 26Return
Carbon Revolution P… (CREVW)1006.3-93.8%
Carbon Revolution P… (CREV)1001.2-98.8%
Gentherm Incorporat… (THRM)10077.7-22.3%
Motorcar Parts of A… (MPAA)100136.7+36.7%
Fox Factory Holding… (FOXF)10023.7-76.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CREVW vs CREV vs THRM vs MPAA vs FOXF

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: THRM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. MPAA also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CREVW
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant
The Defensive Pick

CREVW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 0.80, current ratio 0.86x
  • 86.8% revenue growth vs THRM's 2.6%
  • Beta 0.80 vs CREV's 1.92
Best for: defensive
CREV
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares
The Growth Play

CREV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 86.8%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
Best for: growth exposure
THRM
Gentherm Incorporated
The Defensive Pick

THRM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 40.9%, current ratio 1.92x
  • Lower P/E (11.6x vs 18.4x)
  • 1.5% margin vs CREVW's -309.4%
  • 1.6% ROA vs CREVW's -198.1%, ROIC 7.3% vs -27.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
MPAA
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

MPAA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +24.3% vs CREVW's -89.7%
Best for: momentum
FOXF
Fox Factory Holding Corp.
The Income Pick

FOXF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.55
  • 7.0% 10Y total return vs THRM's -14.9%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCREVW logoCREVW86.8% revenue growth vs THRM's 2.6%
ValueTHRM logoTHRMLower P/E (11.6x vs 18.4x)
Quality / MarginsTHRM logoTHRM1.5% margin vs CREVW's -309.4%
Stability / SafetyCREVW logoCREVWBeta 0.80 vs CREV's 1.92
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MPAA logoMPAA+24.3% vs CREVW's -89.7%
Efficiency (ROA)THRM logoTHRM1.6% ROA vs CREVW's -198.1%, ROIC 7.3% vs -27.1%

CREVW vs CREV vs THRM vs MPAA vs FOXF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CREVWCarbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant

Segment breakdown not available.

CREVCarbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares
FY 2024
Engineering services
100.0%$2M
THRMGentherm Incorporated
FY 2025
Automotive Segments
96.7%$1.4B
Medical Segments
3.3%$50M
MPAAMotorcar Parts of America, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Operating Segment
100.0%$50M
FOXFFox Factory Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Specialty Sports Group
34.7%$509M
Powered Vehicles Group
33.3%$488M
Aftermarket Applications Group
32.0%$470M

CREVW vs CREV vs THRM vs MPAA vs FOXF — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMPAALAGGINGCREV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — THRM and FOXF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

THRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 26.6x CREV's $58M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.5% (THRM) to -3.1% (CREVW). On growth, CREV holds the edge at +107.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCREVW logoCREVWCarbon Revolution…CREV logoCREVCarbon Revolution…THRM logoTHRMGentherm Incorpor…MPAA logoMPAAMotorcar Parts of…FOXF logoFOXFFox Factory Holdi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$71M$58M$1.5B$771M$1.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$25M$127M$49M-$196M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$46M$23M$2M-$300M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$62M$79M$30M$12M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-155.1%-40.2%+23.6%+19.2%+29.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.4%-63.3%+4.7%+6.1%-18.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.1%-79.6%+1.5%+0.3%-20.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-142.6%-107.6%+5.1%+3.9%+0.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+107.9%+11.3%-9.9%+3.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-156.9%-18.2%+94.2%
Evenly matched — THRM and FOXF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MPAA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, MPAA's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than THRM's 8.2x.

MetricCREVW logoCREVWCarbon Revolution…CREV logoCREVCarbon Revolution…THRM logoTHRMGentherm Incorpor…MPAA logoMPAAMotorcar Parts of…FOXF logoFOXFFox Factory Holdi…
Market CapShares × price$775,174$944M$220M$779M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$78M$1.1B$412M$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS51.35x-11.59x-1.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.57x15.29x18.42x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.21x8.19x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.02x0.63x0.29x0.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.32x0.88x1.16x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.45x5.39x28.89x
MPAA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

THRM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

THRM delivers a 3.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-37 for FOXF. THRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOXF's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPAA scores 7/9 vs CREV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCREVW logoCREVWCarbon Revolution…CREV logoCREVCarbon Revolution…THRM logoTHRMGentherm Incorpor…MPAA logoMPAAMotorcar Parts of…FOXF logoFOXFFox Factory Holdi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.2%+0.8%-37.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-198.1%-25.2%+1.6%+0.2%-16.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-27.1%-27.1%+7.3%+6.2%-24.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.1%-3.1%+8.2%+6.6%-30.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933574
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.41x0.78x1.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$107M$107M$134M$192M$722M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$4M$161M$9M$58M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$111M$111M$295M$201M$780M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-6.46x-6.46x5.83x0.94x-5.17x
THRM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MPAA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MPAA five years ago would be worth $4,829 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $137 for CREV. Over the past 12 months, MPAA leads with a +24.3% total return vs CREVW's -89.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPAA at 34.5% vs CREV's -76.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCREVW logoCREVWCarbon Revolution…CREV logoCREVCarbon Revolution…THRM logoTHRMGentherm Incorpor…MPAA logoMPAAMotorcar Parts of…FOXF logoFOXFFox Factory Holdi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-51.4%-76.8%-16.3%-7.2%+6.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-89.7%-85.9%+19.1%+24.3%-8.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%-48.0%+143.5%-80.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%-58.0%-51.7%-88.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%-14.9%-62.7%+7.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-76.1%-19.6%+34.5%-42.1%
MPAA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CREVW and THRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CREVW is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CREV's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. THRM currently trades 78.0% from its 52-week high vs CREV's 4.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCREVW logoCREVWCarbon Revolution…CREV logoCREVCarbon Revolution…THRM logoTHRMGentherm Incorpor…MPAA logoMPAAMotorcar Parts of…FOXF logoFOXFFox Factory Holdi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.80x1.92x1.43x0.99x1.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.05$9.20$39.48$18.12$31.18
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$0.01$25.47$9.09$13.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+6.8%+4.4%+78.0%+63.3%+59.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10034.244.259.758.057.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded61K188K239K87K658K
Evenly matched — CREVW and THRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FOXF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: THRM as "Buy", MPAA as "Buy", FOXF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.4% upside for MPAA (target: $20) vs 15.8% for FOXF (target: $22).

MetricCREVW logoCREVWCarbon Revolution…CREV logoCREVCarbon Revolution…THRM logoTHRMGentherm Incorpor…MPAA logoMPAAMotorcar Parts of…FOXF logoFOXFFox Factory Holdi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$36.67$20.00$21.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts15718
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.1%+2.2%+0.2%
FOXF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MPAA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). THRM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallMotorcar Parts of America, … (MPAA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CREVW vs CREV vs THRM vs MPAA vs FOXF: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CREVW or CREV or THRM or MPAA or FOXF a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the stronger pick with 86.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) offers the better valuation at 51. 4x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CREVW or CREV or THRM or MPAA or FOXF?

On forward P/E, Gentherm Incorporated is actually cheaper at 11.

6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CREVW or CREV or THRM or MPAA or FOXF?

Over the past 5 years, Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.

(MPAA) delivered a total return of -51. 7%, compared to -98. 6% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOXF returned +7. 0% versus CREV's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CREVW or CREV or THRM or MPAA or FOXF?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

80β versus Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 92β — meaning CREV is approximately 139% more volatile than CREVW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 116% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CREVW or CREV or THRM or MPAA or FOXF?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is pulling ahead at 86.

8% versus 2. 6% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -82. 5% for Fox Factory Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CREVW leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CREVW or CREV or THRM or MPAA or FOXF?

Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.

2% net margin versus -309. 4% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPAA leads at 5. 3% versus -235. 9% for CREV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOXF leads at 30. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CREVW or CREV or THRM or MPAA or FOXF more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) trades at 11.

6x forward P/E versus 18. 4x for Fox Factory Holding Corp. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPAA: 74. 4% to $20. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CREVW or CREV or THRM or MPAA or FOXF?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is CREVW or CREV or THRM or MPAA or FOXF better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

80)). Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CREVW and CREV and THRM and MPAA and FOXF?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CREVW is a small-cap high-growth stock; CREV is a small-cap high-growth stock; THRM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOXF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CREVW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Revenue Growth > 43%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CREV

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 53%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

THRM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MPAA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOXF

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CREVW and CREV and THRM and MPAA and FOXF on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CREVW: 86.8% · CREV: 107.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.