Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CRGO
Freightos Limited Ordinary shares

Integrated Freight & Logistics

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$105M
5Y Perf.-79.1%
FRGT
Freight Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$170K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
GLBE
Global-e Online Ltd.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$5.52B
5Y Perf.-50.9%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$342M
5Y Perf.+72.4%
FWRD
Forward Air Corporation

Integrated Freight & Logistics

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$547M
5Y Perf.-82.5%

CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CRGO logoCRGO
FRGT logoFRGT
GLBE logoGLBE
SHIP logoSHIP
FWRD logoFWRD
IndustryIntegrated Freight & LogisticsSoftware - ApplicationSpecialty RetailMarine ShippingIntegrated Freight & Logistics
Market Cap$105M$170K$5.52B$342M$547M
Revenue (TTM)$29M$13M$962M$153M$2.46B
Net Income (TTM)$-18M$-5M$68M$15M$-91M
Gross Margin66.8%13.5%45.3%45.4%23.1%
Operating Margin-65.0%-39.8%7.4%23.4%2.1%
Forward P/E29.2x6.9x
Total Debt$4M$3M$42M$290M$2.16B
Cash & Equiv.$16M$204K$246M$63M$106M

CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CRGO
FRGT
GLBE
SHIP
FWRD
StockNov 21May 26Return
Freightos Limited O… (CRGO)10020.9-79.1%
Freight Technologie… (FRGT)1000.0-100.0%
Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE)10049.1-50.9%
Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP)100172.4+72.4%
Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD)10017.5-82.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SHIP leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Global-e Online Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CRGO
Freightos Limited Ordinary shares
The Defensive Pick

CRGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.

  • Beta 1.98, current ratio 2.16x
Best for: defensive
FRGT
Freight Technologies, Inc.
The Technology Pick

FRGT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
GLBE
Global-e Online Ltd.
The Growth Play

GLBE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 27.8%, EPS growth 186.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
  • 28.0% 10Y total return vs SHIP's -99.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.63, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.93x
  • 27.8% revenue growth vs FRGT's -19.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
The Income Pick

SHIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 2.9%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 9.7% margin vs CRGO's -59.5%
  • Beta 1.21 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability
FWRD
Forward Air Corporation
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, FWRD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGLBE logoGLBE27.8% revenue growth vs FRGT's -19.5%
ValueSHIP logoSHIPBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSHIP logoSHIP9.7% margin vs CRGO's -59.5%
Stability / SafetySHIP logoSHIPBeta 1.21 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage
DividendsSHIP logoSHIP2.9% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SHIP logoSHIP+207.0% vs FRGT's -86.0%
Efficiency (ROA)GLBE logoGLBE4.7% ROA vs FRGT's -43.8%, ROIC 7.7% vs -147.2%

CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CRGOFreightos Limited Ordinary shares
FY 2024
Subscriptions
100.0%$15M
FRGTFreight Technologies, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GLBEGlobal-e Online Ltd.
FY 2024
Fulfillment Services
53.5%$402M
Service Fees
46.5%$350M
SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
FY 2021
Time Charter
81.5%$125M
Spot Charter
18.5%$28M
FWRDForward Air Corporation
FY 2025
Expedited Freight Segment
81.5%$1.0B
Intermodal Segment
18.5%$231M

CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSHIPLAGGINGFRGT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SHIP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FWRD is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 185.8x FRGT's $13M. SHIP is the more profitable business, keeping 9.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRGO's -59.5%. On growth, FRGT holds the edge at +30.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCRGO logoCRGOFreightos Limited…FRGT logoFRGTFreight Technolog…GLBE logoGLBEGlobal-e Online L…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…FWRD logoFWRDForward Air Corpo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$29M$13M$962M$153M$2.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$16M-$5M$130M$68M$206M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$18M-$5M$68M$15M-$91M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$10M-$9M$295M-$6M$38M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+66.8%+13.5%+45.3%+45.4%+23.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-65.0%-39.8%+7.4%+23.4%+2.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-59.5%-40.3%+7.1%+9.7%-3.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-32.4%-64.9%+30.6%-4.2%+1.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.4%+30.2%+28.0%+18.6%-5.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+63.1%+76.5%+84.4%+35.1%
SHIP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SHIP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, SHIP trades at a 81% valuation discount to GLBE's 83.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SHIP's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLBE's 57.4x.

MetricCRGO logoCRGOFreightos Limited…FRGT logoFRGTFreight Technolog…GLBE logoGLBEGlobal-e Online L…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…FWRD logoFWRDForward Air Corpo…
Market CapShares × price$105M$169,559$5.5B$342M$547M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$93M$3M$5.3B$570M$2.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.86x-0.03x83.67x16.05x-4.98x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.20x6.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple57.36x7.38x13.75x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.57x0.01x5.74x2.16x0.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.42x6.16x1.18x3.32x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.66x20.11x35.82x
SHIP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GLBE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

GLBE delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-85 for FRGT. GLBE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLBE scores 6/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCRGO logoCRGOFreightos Limited…FRGT logoFRGTFreight Technolog…GLBE logoGLBEGlobal-e Online L…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…FWRD logoFWRDForward Air Corpo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-40.8%-85.0%+7.3%+5.3%-52.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-27.9%-43.8%+4.7%+2.5%-3.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-37.5%-147.2%+7.7%+6.1%+1.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-37.4%-5.9%+7.7%+7.1%+1.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943635
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.04x1.03x13.36x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$12M$3M-$204M$228M$2.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$16M$204,032$246M$63M$106M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4M$3M$42M$290M$2.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-71.01x-7.16x17.83x1.68x0.32x
GLBE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SHIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SHIP five years ago would be worth $16,564 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for FRGT. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs FRGT's -86.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs FRGT's -92.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCRGO logoCRGOFreightos Limited…FRGT logoFRGTFreight Technolog…GLBE logoGLBEGlobal-e Online L…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…FWRD logoFWRDForward Air Corpo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.1%-59.6%-13.8%+79.9%-31.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-2.4%-86.0%-12.5%+207.0%+0.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.9%-100.0%+4.0%+282.1%-81.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.0%-100.0%+28.0%+65.6%-80.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.0%-100.0%+28.0%-99.7%-47.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-3.8%-92.6%+1.3%+56.3%-42.8%
SHIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SHIP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SHIP is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHIP currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs FRGT's 8.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCRGO logoCRGOFreightos Limited…FRGT logoFRGTFreight Technolog…GLBE logoGLBEGlobal-e Online L…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…FWRD logoFWRDForward Air Corpo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.98x1.57x1.63x1.21x2.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.24$8.60$43.21$16.77$32.47
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.17$0.62$27.80$5.37$14.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+48.3%+8.6%+75.5%+96.6%+53.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.335.745.262.942.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded137K193K1.1M258K733K
SHIP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FWRD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CRGO as "Buy", GLBE as "Buy", SHIP as "Buy", FWRD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for FWRD (target: $37) vs 4.9% for SHIP (target: $17). SHIP is the only dividend payer here at 2.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCRGO logoCRGOFreightos Limited…FRGT logoFRGTFreight Technolog…GLBE logoGLBEGlobal-e Online L…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…FWRD logoFWRDForward Air Corpo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.00$43.40$17.00$37.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts314321
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises08
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.46
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.3%0.0%+0.2%
FWRD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SHIP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GLBE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallSeanergy Maritime Holdings … (SHIP)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Global-e Online Ltd.

(GLBE) is the stronger pick with 27. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 5% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD?

On trailing P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Global-e Online Ltd. at 83. 7x. On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD?

Over the past 5 years, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) delivered a total return of +65. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLBE returned +28. 0% versus FRGT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately 88% more volatile than SHIP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global-e Online Ltd.

(GLBE) is pulling ahead at 27. 8% versus -19. 5% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Global-e Online Ltd. grew EPS 186. 7% year-over-year, compared to -52. 1% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLBE leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD?

Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus -59. 5% for Freightos Limited Ordinary shares — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHIP leads at 26. 0% versus -65. 0% for CRGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRGO leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 29. 2x for Global-e Online Ltd. — 22. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113. 5% to $37. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD?

In this comparison, SHIP (2.

9% yield) pays a dividend. CRGO, FRGT, GLBE, FWRD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), 2. 9% yield). Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHIP: -99. 7%, CRGO: -79. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CRGO and FRGT and GLBE and SHIP and FWRD?

These companies operate in different sectors (CRGO (Industrials) and FRGT (Technology) and GLBE (Consumer Cyclical) and SHIP (Industrials) and FWRD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CRGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; FRGT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GLBE is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SHIP pays a dividend while CRGO, FRGT, GLBE, FWRD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CRGO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FRGT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GLBE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHIP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FWRD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CRGO and FRGT and GLBE and SHIP and FWRD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CRGO: 12.4% · FRGT: 30.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.