Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Specialty Retail
Marine Shipping
Integrated Freight & Logistics
CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Software - Application | Specialty Retail | Marine Shipping | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $105M | $170K | $5.52B | $342M | $547M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29M | $13M | $962M | $153M | $2.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $-5M | $68M | $15M | $-91M |
| Gross Margin | 66.8% | 13.5% | 45.3% | 45.4% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | -65.0% | -39.8% | 7.4% | 23.4% | 2.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 29.2x | 6.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $3M | $42M | $290M | $2.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $204K | $246M | $63M | $106M |
CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freightos Limited O… (CRGO) | 100 | 20.9 | -79.1% |
| Freight Technologie… (FRGT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) | 100 | 49.1 | -50.9% |
| Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP) | 100 | 172.4 | +72.4% |
| Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD) | 100 | 17.5 | -82.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.98, current ratio 2.16x
FRGT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GLBE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.8%, EPS growth 186.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- 28.0% 10Y total return vs SHIP's -99.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.63, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.93x
- 27.8% revenue growth vs FRGT's -19.5%
SHIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 2.9%
- Better valuation composite
- 9.7% margin vs CRGO's -59.5%
- Beta 1.21 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, FWRD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.8% revenue growth vs FRGT's -19.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.7% margin vs CRGO's -59.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +207.0% vs FRGT's -86.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs FRGT's -43.8%, ROIC 7.7% vs -147.2% |
CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SHIP leads in 4 of 6 categories
GLBE leads 1 • FWRD leads 1 • CRGO leads 0 • FRGT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHIP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FWRD is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 185.8x FRGT's $13M. SHIP is the more profitable business, keeping 9.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRGO's -59.5%. On growth, FRGT holds the edge at +30.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29M | $13M | $962M | $153M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | -$5M | $130M | $68M | $206M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | -$5M | $68M | $15M | -$91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$9M | $295M | -$6M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | +13.5% | +45.3% | +45.4% | +23.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -65.0% | -39.8% | +7.4% | +23.4% | +2.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -59.5% | -40.3% | +7.1% | +9.7% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.4% | -64.9% | +30.6% | -4.2% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | +30.2% | +28.0% | +18.6% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.1% | +76.5% | — | +84.4% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SHIP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, SHIP trades at a 81% valuation discount to GLBE's 83.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SHIP's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLBE's 57.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $105M | $169,559 | $5.5B | $342M | $547M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $93M | $3M | $5.3B | $570M | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.86x | -0.03x | 83.67x | 16.05x | -4.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 29.20x | 6.93x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.64x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 57.36x | 7.38x | 13.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.57x | 0.01x | 5.74x | 2.16x | 0.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.42x | — | 6.16x | 1.18x | 3.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.66x | 20.11x | 35.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLBE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLBE delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-85 for FRGT. GLBE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLBE scores 6/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.8% | -85.0% | +7.3% | +5.3% | -52.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.9% | -43.8% | +4.7% | +2.5% | -3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -37.5% | -147.2% | +7.7% | +6.1% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -37.4% | -5.9% | +7.7% | +7.1% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | — | 0.04x | 1.03x | 13.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $3M | -$204M | $228M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $204,032 | $246M | $63M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $3M | $42M | $290M | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -71.01x | -7.16x | 17.83x | 1.68x | 0.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHIP five years ago would be worth $16,564 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for FRGT. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs FRGT's -86.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs FRGT's -92.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.1% | -59.6% | -13.8% | +79.9% | -31.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.4% | -86.0% | -12.5% | +207.0% | +0.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.9% | -100.0% | +4.0% | +282.1% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.0% | -100.0% | +28.0% | +65.6% | -80.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.0% | -100.0% | +28.0% | -99.7% | -47.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.8% | -92.6% | +1.3% | +56.3% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SHIP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHIP is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHIP currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs FRGT's 8.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 1.57x | 1.63x | 1.21x | 2.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.24 | $8.60 | $43.21 | $16.77 | $32.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.17 | $0.62 | $27.80 | $5.37 | $14.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.3% | +8.6% | +75.5% | +96.6% | +53.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 35.7 | 45.2 | 62.9 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 137K | 193K | 1.1M | 258K | 733K |
Analyst Outlook
FWRD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRGO as "Buy", GLBE as "Buy", SHIP as "Buy", FWRD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for FWRD (target: $37) vs 4.9% for SHIP (target: $17). SHIP is the only dividend payer here at 2.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | — | $43.40 | $17.00 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | — | 14 | 3 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.46 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.3% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
SHIP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GLBE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
CRGO vs FRGT vs GLBE vs SHIP vs FWRD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is the stronger pick with 27. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 5% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD?
On trailing P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Global-e Online Ltd. at 83. 7x. On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD?
Over the past 5 years, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) delivered a total return of +65. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLBE returned +28. 0% versus FRGT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately 88% more volatile than SHIP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is pulling ahead at 27. 8% versus -19. 5% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Global-e Online Ltd. grew EPS 186. 7% year-over-year, compared to -52. 1% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLBE leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD?
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus -59. 5% for Freightos Limited Ordinary shares — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHIP leads at 26. 0% versus -65. 0% for CRGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRGO leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 29. 2x for Global-e Online Ltd. — 22. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113. 5% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD?
In this comparison, SHIP (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. CRGO, FRGT, GLBE, FWRD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CRGO or FRGT or GLBE or SHIP or FWRD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), 2. 9% yield). Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHIP: -99. 7%, CRGO: -79. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRGO and FRGT and GLBE and SHIP and FWRD?
These companies operate in different sectors (CRGO (Industrials) and FRGT (Technology) and GLBE (Consumer Cyclical) and SHIP (Industrials) and FWRD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CRGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; FRGT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GLBE is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SHIP pays a dividend while CRGO, FRGT, GLBE, FWRD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.