CRGO vs FWRD

For growth investors, Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) is the stronger pick with 23.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). Analysts rate Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) delivered a total return of -79.

0%, compared to -80. 2% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FWRD returned -47. 3% versus CRGO's -79. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

98β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately 15% more volatile than CRGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) is pulling ahead at 23.

9% versus 0. 8% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Forward Air Corporation grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to 23. 9% for Freightos Limited Ordinary shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRGO leads at 15. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) is the more profitable company, earning -4.

3% net margin versus -59. 5% for Freightos Limited Ordinary shares — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FWRD leads at 1. 5% versus -65. 0% for CRGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRGO leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FWRD: -47. 3%, CRGO: -79. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CRGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.