CRGO vs FWRD vs XPO vs CHRW

For growth investors, Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) is the stronger pick with 23.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) offers the better valuation at 35. 5x trailing P/E (27. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, C.

H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the cheapest at 35. 5x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. at 78. 3x. On forward P/E, C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. is actually cheaper at 27. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: XPO Logistics, Inc. wins at 1. 59x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 5. 20x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.

(XPO) delivered a total return of +306. 8%, compared to -80. 2% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 5% versus CRGO's -79. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C.

H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately 140% more volatile than CHRW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) is pulling ahead at 23.

9% versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Forward Air Corporation grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -18. 3% for XPO Logistics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRGO leads at 15. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

XPO Logistics, Inc.

(XPO) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 9% net margin versus -59. 5% for Freightos Limited Ordinary shares — meaning it keeps 3. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPO leads at 8. 9% versus -65. 0% for CRGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRGO leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 59x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 5. 20x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) trades at 27. 9x forward P/E versus 43. 9x for XPO Logistics, Inc. — 16. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113. 5% to $37. 00.

In this comparison, CHRW (1.

4% yield) pays a dividend. CRGO, FWRD, XPO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, C.

H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 4% yield, +163. 6% 10Y return). Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHRW: +163. 6%, CRGO: -79. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CRGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XPO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CHRW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CHRW pays a dividend while CRGO, FWRD, XPO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.