Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CRGO vs GLBE vs UPS vs FOUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Software - Infrastructure
CRGO vs GLBE vs UPS vs FOUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Specialty Retail | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $105M | $5.52B | $85.05B | $3.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29M | $962M | $88.33B | $3.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $68M | $5.25B | $86M |
| Gross Margin | 66.8% | 45.3% | 18.1% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | -65.0% | 7.4% | 8.6% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.2x | 14.1x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $42M | $32.29B | $4.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $246M | $5.89B | $964M |
CRGO vs GLBE vs UPS vs FOUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freightos Limited O… (CRGO) | 100 | 20.9 | -79.1% |
| Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) | 100 | 49.1 | -50.9% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 50.5 | -49.5% |
| Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR) | 100 | 90.1 | -9.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRGO vs GLBE vs UPS vs FOUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRGO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GLBE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.8%, EPS growth 186.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.63, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.93x
- PEG 0.22 vs UPS's 0.42
- 27.8% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5%
UPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 6.3%
- 44.7% 10Y total return vs GLBE's 28.0%
- Beta 0.90, yield 6.3%, current ratio 1.22x
- Beta 0.90 vs CRGO's 1.98
FOUR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 14.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.8% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.1% margin vs CRGO's -59.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs CRGO's 1.98 | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs FOUR's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.5% vs FOUR's -43.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs CRGO's -27.9%, ROIC 16.1% vs -37.5% |
CRGO vs GLBE vs UPS vs FOUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CRGO vs GLBE vs UPS vs FOUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UPS leads in 3 of 6 categories
GLBE leads 1 • FOUR leads 1 • CRGO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLBE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $88.3B annually — 2998.5x CRGO's $29M. GLBE is the more profitable business, keeping 7.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRGO's -59.5%. On growth, GLBE holds the edge at +28.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29M | $962M | $88.3B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $130M | $10.5B | $629M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | $68M | $5.2B | $86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $295M | $4.5B | $687M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | +45.3% | +18.1% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -65.0% | +7.4% | +8.6% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -59.5% | +7.1% | +5.9% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.4% | +30.6% | +5.1% | +20.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | +28.0% | -1.6% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.1% | — | -27.1% | -105.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FOUR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, UPS trades at a 82% valuation discount to GLBE's 83.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UPS offers better value at 0.45x vs GLBE's 0.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $105M | $5.5B | $85.1B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $93M | $5.3B | $111.5B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.86x | 83.67x | 15.26x | 43.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.20x | 14.13x | 8.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.64x | 0.45x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 57.36x | 9.12x | 9.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.57x | 5.74x | 0.96x | 0.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.42x | 6.16x | 5.23x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.66x | 17.85x | 7.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS delivers a 33.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-41 for CRGO. GLBE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOUR's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOUR scores 7/9 vs CRGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.8% | +7.3% | +33.0% | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.9% | +4.7% | +7.3% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -37.5% | +7.7% | +16.1% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -37.4% | +7.7% | +15.3% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.04x | 1.99x | 2.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$204M | $26.4B | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $246M | $5.9B | $964M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $42M | $32.3B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -71.01x | 17.83x | 7.37x | 3.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GLBE and UPS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLBE five years ago would be worth $12,796 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,096 for CRGO. Over the past 12 months, UPS leads with a +13.5% total return vs FOUR's -43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLBE at 1.3% vs UPS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.1% | -13.8% | +0.7% | -25.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.4% | -12.5% | +13.5% | -43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.9% | +4.0% | -31.4% | -24.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.0% | +28.0% | -40.0% | -46.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.0% | +28.0% | +44.7% | +39.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.8% | +1.3% | -11.8% | -8.7% |
Risk & Volatility
UPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRGO's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UPS currently trades 81.8% from its 52-week high vs FOUR's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 1.63x | 0.90x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.24 | $43.21 | $122.41 | $108.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.17 | $27.80 | $82.00 | $39.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.3% | +75.5% | +81.8% | +43.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 45.2 | 44.0 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 137K | 1.1M | 5.8M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
UPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRGO as "Buy", GLBE as "Buy", UPS as "Hold", FOUR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 56.6% upside for FOUR (target: $73) vs 15.1% for UPS (target: $115). For income investors, UPS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.34% vs FOUR's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | $43.40 | $115.23 | $73.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 14 | 45 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +6.3% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 16 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $6.35 | $0.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% | +1.2% | +12.8% |
UPS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). GLBE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CRGO vs GLBE vs UPS vs FOUR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRGO or GLBE or UPS or FOUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is the stronger pick with 27. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRGO or GLBE or UPS or FOUR?
On trailing P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus Global-e Online Ltd. at 83. 7x. On forward P/E, Shift4 Payments, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Global-e Online Ltd. wins at 0. 22x versus United Parcel Service, Inc. 's 0. 42x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRGO or GLBE or UPS or FOUR?
Over the past 5 years, Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) delivered a total return of +28. 0%, compared to -79. 0% for Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UPS returned +44. 7% versus CRGO's -79. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRGO or GLBE or UPS or FOUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Freightos Limited Ordinary shares's 1. 98β — meaning CRGO is approximately 119% more volatile than UPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRGO or GLBE or UPS or FOUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is pulling ahead at 27. 8% versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Global-e Online Ltd. grew EPS 186. 7% year-over-year, compared to -64. 4% for Shift4 Payments, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLBE leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRGO or GLBE or UPS or FOUR?
Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus -59. 5% for Freightos Limited Ordinary shares — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPS leads at 9. 6% versus -65. 0% for CRGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRGO leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRGO or GLBE or UPS or FOUR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus United Parcel Service, Inc. 's 0. 42x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 29. 2x for Global-e Online Ltd. — 20. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOUR: 56. 6% to $73. 36.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRGO or GLBE or UPS or FOUR?
In this comparison, UPS (6.
3% yield), FOUR (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CRGO, GLBE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CRGO or GLBE or UPS or FOUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 6. 3% yield). Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UPS: +44. 7%, CRGO: -79. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRGO and GLBE and UPS and FOUR?
These companies operate in different sectors (CRGO (Industrials) and GLBE (Consumer Cyclical) and UPS (Industrials) and FOUR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CRGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; GLBE is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FOUR is a small-cap high-growth stock. UPS, FOUR pay a dividend while CRGO, GLBE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.