Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CRMD vs ACAD vs NKTR vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CRMD vs ACAD vs NKTR vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $621M | $3.86B | $1.69B | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $312M | $1.10B | $55M | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $163M | $376M | $-164M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 88.5% | 91.5% | 99.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 48.2% | 7.4% | -237.9% | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 50.9x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $149M | $52M | $149M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $146M | $178M | $15M | $357M |
CRMD vs ACAD vs NKTR vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CorMedix Inc. (CRMD) | 100 | 156.8 | +56.8% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 35.1 | -64.9% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRMD vs ACAD vs NKTR vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.2%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.8%
- 6.2% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Better valuation composite
- 52.3% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 1.26
- -22.9% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 1.26, current ratio 3.83x
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs CRMD's -32.2%
PRAX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.2% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.3% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs CRMD's -32.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 33.0% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 49.7% vs -57.2% |
CRMD vs ACAD vs NKTR vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CRMD vs ACAD vs NKTR vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRMD leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • ACAD leads 0 • NKTR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. CRMD is the more profitable business, keeping 52.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, CRMD holds the edge at +3.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $312M | $1.1B | $55M | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $165M | $96M | -$130M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $163M | $376M | -$164M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $174M | $212M | -$209M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.5% | +91.5% | +99.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.2% | +7.4% | -2.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +52.3% | +34.3% | -3.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +56.0% | +19.4% | -3.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +9.7% | -25.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.8% | -81.8% | -4.5% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CRMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.9x trailing earnings, CRMD trades at a 61% valuation discount to ACAD's 9.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRMD's 3.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $621M | $3.9B | $1.7B | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $624M | $3.7B | $1.8B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.88x | 9.85x | -8.57x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.18x | 50.91x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.78x | 26.91x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.99x | 3.61x | 30.64x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.57x | 3.15x | 15.66x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.60x | 36.74x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRMD delivers a 58.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $58 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +58.5% | +35.6% | -4.0% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +33.0% | +26.2% | -62.8% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +49.7% | +10.0% | -57.2% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +40.8% | +10.1% | -55.7% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.04x | 1.66x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$126M | $134M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $146M | $178M | $15M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $149M | $52M | $149M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 53.97x | — | -4.74x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACAD five years ago would be worth $10,710 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,765 for NKTR. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs CRMD's -32.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs ACAD's 1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.9% | -13.7% | +92.0% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -32.2% | +52.4% | +818.2% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | +4.7% | +621.8% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.9% | +7.1% | -72.3% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.4% | -22.9% | -59.1% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +1.5% | +93.3% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACAD and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs CRMD's 45.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.26x | 1.85x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.43 | $27.81 | $109.00 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.13 | $14.45 | $7.99 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.4% | +81.1% | +76.5% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.7 | 44.2 | 53.4 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.8M | 991K | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRMD as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.8% upside for CRMD (target: $14) vs 54.1% for ACAD (target: $35).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $34.78 | $132.83 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 37 | 33 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CRMD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CRMD vs ACAD vs NKTR vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRMD or ACAD or NKTR or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CorMedix Inc.
(CRMD) is the stronger pick with 617. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). CorMedix Inc. (CRMD) offers the better valuation at 3. 9x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CorMedix Inc. (CRMD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRMD or ACAD or NKTR or PRAX?
On trailing P/E, CorMedix Inc.
(CRMD) is the cheapest at 3. 9x versus ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. at 9. 9x. On forward P/E, CorMedix Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRMD or ACAD or NKTR or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) delivered a total return of +7. 1%, compared to -72. 3% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRAX returned -20. 1% versus NKTR's -59. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRMD or ACAD or NKTR or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 47% more volatile than ACAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRMD or ACAD or NKTR or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CorMedix Inc.
(CRMD) is pulling ahead at 617. 0% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CorMedix Inc. grew EPS 780. 0% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRMD leads at 1583% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRMD or ACAD or NKTR or PRAX?
CorMedix Inc.
(CRMD) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 3% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 52. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRMD leads at 48. 2% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRMD or ACAD or NKTR or PRAX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CorMedix Inc.
(CRMD) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 36. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRMD: 76. 8% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRMD or ACAD or NKTR or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CRMD or ACAD or NKTR or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26)). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACAD: -22. 9%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRMD and ACAD and NKTR and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRMD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.