Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CRMT vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
CRMT vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $107M | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 5.5x | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $845M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $86.81B |
CRMT vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| America's Car-Mart,… (CRMT) | 100 | 16.2 | -83.8% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRMT vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRMT is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 35.3x)
- 0.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.51
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs CRMT's -48.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs CRMT's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 35.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs CRMT's -11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs CRMT's 1.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.6% vs CRMT's -72.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs CRMT's -7.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs 5.2% |
CRMT vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CRMT vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 714.5x CRMT's $1.0B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRMT's -11.8%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.8% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.7% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.2% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CRMT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.5x trailing earnings, CRMT trades at a 86% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRMT's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $107M | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $943M | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.55x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.30x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.17x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 384.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-23 for CRMT. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRMT's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs CRMT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.6% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.48x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $835M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $845M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.18x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $860 for CRMT. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs CRMT's -72.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs CRMT's -46.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.8% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.7% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.7% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.4% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.4% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.6% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMZN is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRMT's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs CRMT's 20.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.72 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.63 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.6% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 150K | 45.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CRMT as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.6% upside for AMZN (target: $307) vs 8.4% for CRMT (target: $14).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CRMT vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRMT or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT). America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRMT or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, America's Car-Mart, Inc.
(CRMT) is the cheapest at 5. 5x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRMT or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -91. 4% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus CRMT's -48. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRMT or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus America's Car-Mart, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning CRMT is approximately 22% more volatile than AMZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 148% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRMT or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -0. 2% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: America's Car-Mart, Inc. grew EPS 147. 5% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRMT or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 1. 3% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus 6. 7% for CRMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRMT or AMZN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMZN: 11.
6% to $306. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRMT or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CRMT or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 9% 10Y return). America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +715. 9%, CRMT: -48. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRMT and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRMT is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.