CRS vs GE vs RTX vs HWM

For growth investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger pick with 18.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). RTX Corporation (RTX) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (25. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the cheapest at 35.

6x versus Howmet Aerospace Inc. at 73. 5x. On forward P/E, RTX Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Carpenter Technology Corporation wins at 0. 20x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) delivered a total return of +985.

7%, compared to +120. 1% for RTX Corporation (RTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRS returned +1387% versus GE's +121. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RTX Corporation (RTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

51β versus Carpenter Technology Corporation's 1. 37β — meaning CRS is approximately 169% more volatile than RTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 108% for GE Aerospace — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Aerospace (GE) is pulling ahead at 18.

5% versus 4. 3% for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carpenter Technology Corporation grew EPS 100. 5% year-over-year, compared to 32. 0% for Howmet Aerospace Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

0% net margin versus 7. 6% for RTX Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWM leads at 25. 8% versus 10. 0% for RTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GE leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, RTX Corporation (RTX) trades at 25. 5x forward P/E versus 58. 7x for Howmet Aerospace Inc. — 33. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GE: 27. 6% to $386. 20.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

RTX Corporation (RTX) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 2% for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM).

For long-horizon retirement investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

51), 1. 5% yield, +234. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RTX: +234. 7%, GE: +121. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock; HWM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. RTX pays a dividend while CRS, GE, HWM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.