Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CRTO
Criteo S.A.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$811M
5Y Perf.+54.7%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.03B
5Y Perf.+110.3%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.96T
5Y Perf.+125.1%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.81T
5Y Perf.+455.0%

CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CRTO logoCRTO
NFLX logoNFLX
AMZN logoAMZN
GOOGL logoGOOGL
IndustryAdvertising AgenciesEntertainmentSpecialty RetailInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$811M$374.03B$2.96T$4.81T
Revenue (TTM)$1.92B$45.18B$742.78B$422.57B
Net Income (TTM)$115M$10.98B$90.80B$160.21B
Gross Margin54.0%48.5%50.6%60.4%
Operating Margin8.6%29.5%11.5%32.7%
Forward P/E3.6x24.8x35.3x29.6x
Total Debt$150M$14.46B$152.99B$59.29B
Cash & Equiv.$342M$9.03B$86.81B$30.71B

CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CRTO
NFLX
AMZN
GOOGL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Criteo S.A. (CRTO)100154.7+54.7%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100210.3+110.3%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100225.1+125.1%
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)100555.0+455.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GOOGL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Netflix, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. CRTO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CRTO
Criteo S.A.
The Defensive Pick

CRTO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 12.6%, current ratio 1.27x
  • PEG 0.55 vs AMZN's 1.26
  • Lower P/E (3.6x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.55 vs 0.99
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Income Pick

NFLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • beta 0.39
  • Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
  • Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
  • 15.9% revenue growth vs CRTO's 0.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Secondary Option

AMZN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 10.0% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.7%
  • 37.9% margin vs CRTO's 6.0%
  • 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +144.2% vs CRTO's -42.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNFLX logoNFLX15.9% revenue growth vs CRTO's 0.6%
ValueCRTO logoCRTOLower P/E (3.6x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.55 vs 0.99
Quality / MarginsGOOGL logoGOOGL37.9% margin vs CRTO's 6.0%
Stability / SafetyNFLX logoNFLXBeta 0.39 vs AMZN's 1.51
DividendsGOOGL logoGOOGL0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GOOGL logoGOOGL+144.2% vs CRTO's -42.8%
Efficiency (ROA)GOOGL logoGOOGL27.4% ROA vs CRTO's 5.5%, ROIC 25.1% vs 16.1%

CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CRTOCriteo S.A.
FY 2025
Retail Media
100.0%$264M
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
FY 2025
Google Search & Other
55.7%$224.5B
Google Cloud
14.6%$58.7B
Google Inc.
11.9%$48.0B
YouTube Advertising Revenue
10.0%$40.4B
Google Network
7.4%$29.8B
Other Bets
0.4%$1.5B
Other Segments
-0.0%$-127,000,000

CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCRTOLAGGINGAMZN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 387.2x CRTO's $1.9B. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRTO's 6.0%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCRTO logoCRTOCriteo S.A.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$45.2B$742.8B$422.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$270M$30.1B$155.9B$161.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$115M$11.0B$90.8B$160.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$211M$9.5B-$2.5B$73.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+54.0%+48.5%+50.6%+60.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.6%+29.5%+11.5%+32.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.0%+24.3%+12.2%+37.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.0%+20.9%-0.3%+17.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.9%+17.6%+16.6%+21.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-77.3%+31.1%+74.8%+81.9%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CRTO leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 6.0x trailing earnings, CRTO trades at a 84% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CRTO offers better value at 0.34x vs AMZN's 1.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCRTO logoCRTOCriteo S.A.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Market CapShares × price$811M$374.0B$2.96T$4.81T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$619M$379.5B$3.02T$4.84T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.98x34.89x38.35x36.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3.63x24.80x35.26x29.60x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.34x1.06x1.37x1.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.87x12.61x20.74x32.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.42x8.28x4.12x11.94x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.71x14.32x7.24x11.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.89x39.53x384.26x65.69x
CRTO leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CRTO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for CRTO. CRTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRTO scores 8/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCRTO logoCRTOCriteo S.A.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.9%+41.3%+23.3%+39.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.5%+19.8%+11.5%+27.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.1%+29.8%+14.7%+25.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+15.7%+30.5%+15.3%+30.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98767
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.54x0.37x0.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$192M$5.4B$66.2B$28.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$342M$9.0B$86.8B$30.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$150M$14.5B$153.0B$59.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense117.52x17.33x39.96x392.15x
CRTO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $34,180 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,208 for CRTO. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +144.2% total return vs CRTO's -42.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs CRTO's -20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCRTO logoCRTOCriteo S.A.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-20.9%-3.0%+21.4%+26.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-42.8%-22.4%+48.6%+144.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.7%+166.5%+159.8%+270.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-57.9%+76.7%+66.3%+241.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-62.5%+872.1%+715.9%+1001.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-20.5%+38.6%+37.5%+54.8%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs CRTO's 51.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCRTO logoCRTOCriteo S.A.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.76x0.39x1.51x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$30.64$134.12$278.56$399.85
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.57$75.01$183.85$147.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+51.8%+65.8%+98.7%+99.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.034.180.581.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded275K44.9M45.6M28.4M
Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CRTO as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.0% upside for CRTO (target: $31) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCRTO logoCRTOCriteo S.A.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.25$116.29$306.77$406.28
# AnalystsCovering analysts33999482
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+18.7%+2.4%0.0%+0.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CRTO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallCriteo S.A. (CRTO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for Criteo S. A. (CRTO). Criteo S. A. (CRTO) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (3. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Criteo S. A. (CRTO) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?

On trailing P/E, Criteo S.

A. (CRTO) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, Criteo S. A. is actually cheaper at 3. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Criteo S. A. wins at 0. 55x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?

Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +241. 8%, compared to -57. 9% for Criteo S. A. (CRTO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1002% versus CRTO's -62. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 288% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Criteo S. A. (CRTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 0. 6% for Criteo S. A. (CRTO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Criteo S. A. grew EPS 39. 5% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?

Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus 7. 4% for Criteo S. A. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus 10. 4% for CRTO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Criteo S. A. (CRTO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Criteo S. A. (CRTO) trades at 3. 6x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 31. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRTO: 97. 0% to $31. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?

In this comparison, GOOGL (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. CRTO, NFLX, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +872. 1% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +872. 1%, AMZN: +715. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CRTO and NFLX and AMZN and GOOGL?

These companies operate in different sectors (CRTO (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CRTO is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CRTO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOOGL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CRTO and NFLX and AMZN and GOOGL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CRTO: -5.9% · NFLX: 17.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(CRTO: 6.0% · NFLX: 24.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CRTO: 6.0x · NFLX: 34.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.