Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Entertainment | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $811M | $374.03B | $2.96T | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.92B | $45.18B | $742.78B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $115M | $10.98B | $90.80B | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 54.0% | 48.5% | 50.6% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 29.5% | 11.5% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 3.6x | 24.8x | 35.3x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $150M | $14.46B | $152.99B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $342M | $9.03B | $86.81B | $30.71B |
CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Criteo S.A. (CRTO) | 100 | 154.7 | +54.7% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 555.0 | +455.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRTO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 12.6%, current ratio 1.27x
- PEG 0.55 vs AMZN's 1.26
- Lower P/E (3.6x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.55 vs 0.99
NFLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 0.39
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
- 15.9% revenue growth vs CRTO's 0.6%
AMZN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.7%
- 37.9% margin vs CRTO's 6.0%
- 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +144.2% vs CRTO's -42.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs CRTO's 0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.6x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.55 vs 0.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs CRTO's 6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +144.2% vs CRTO's -42.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs CRTO's 5.5%, ROIC 25.1% vs 16.1% |
CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
CRTO leads 2 • NFLX leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 387.2x CRTO's $1.9B. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRTO's 6.0%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $45.2B | $742.8B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $270M | $30.1B | $155.9B | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $115M | $11.0B | $90.8B | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $211M | $9.5B | -$2.5B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.0% | +48.5% | +50.6% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +29.5% | +11.5% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +24.3% | +12.2% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +20.9% | -0.3% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.9% | +17.6% | +16.6% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -77.3% | +31.1% | +74.8% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CRTO leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, CRTO trades at a 84% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CRTO offers better value at 0.34x vs AMZN's 1.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $811M | $374.0B | $2.96T | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $619M | $379.5B | $3.02T | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.98x | 34.89x | 38.35x | 36.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.63x | 24.80x | 35.26x | 29.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.34x | 1.06x | 1.37x | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.87x | 12.61x | 20.74x | 32.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 8.28x | 4.12x | 11.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 14.32x | 7.24x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.89x | 39.53x | 384.26x | 65.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRTO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for CRTO. CRTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRTO scores 8/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +41.3% | +23.3% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +19.8% | +11.5% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.1% | +29.8% | +14.7% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.7% | +30.5% | +15.3% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.54x | 0.37x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$192M | $5.4B | $66.2B | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $342M | $9.0B | $86.8B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $150M | $14.5B | $153.0B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 117.52x | 17.33x | 39.96x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $34,180 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,208 for CRTO. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +144.2% total return vs CRTO's -42.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs CRTO's -20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.9% | -3.0% | +21.4% | +26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.8% | -22.4% | +48.6% | +144.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.7% | +166.5% | +159.8% | +270.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.9% | +76.7% | +66.3% | +241.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.5% | +872.1% | +715.9% | +1001.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.5% | +38.6% | +37.5% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs CRTO's 51.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.39x | 1.51x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.64 | $134.12 | $278.56 | $399.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.57 | $75.01 | $183.85 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.8% | +65.8% | +98.7% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 34.1 | 80.5 | 81.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 275K | 44.9M | 45.6M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRTO as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.0% upside for CRTO (target: $31) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.25 | $116.29 | $306.77 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 99 | 94 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +18.7% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CRTO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CRTO vs NFLX vs AMZN vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for Criteo S. A. (CRTO). Criteo S. A. (CRTO) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (3. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Criteo S. A. (CRTO) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Criteo S.
A. (CRTO) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, Criteo S. A. is actually cheaper at 3. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Criteo S. A. wins at 0. 55x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +241. 8%, compared to -57. 9% for Criteo S. A. (CRTO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1002% versus CRTO's -62. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 288% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Criteo S. A. (CRTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 0. 6% for Criteo S. A. (CRTO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Criteo S. A. grew EPS 39. 5% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus 7. 4% for Criteo S. A. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus 10. 4% for CRTO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Criteo S. A. (CRTO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Criteo S. A. (CRTO) trades at 3. 6x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 31. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRTO: 97. 0% to $31. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CRTO, NFLX, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CRTO or NFLX or AMZN or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +872. 1% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +872. 1%, AMZN: +715. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRTO and NFLX and AMZN and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (CRTO (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CRTO is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.