Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CSAI vs CEVA vs QCOM vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
CSAI vs CEVA vs QCOM vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $8M | $810M | $213.51B | $550.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $108M | $44.49B | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-11M | $9.92B | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 45.0% | 87.2% | 54.8% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | -202.1% | -10.1% | 25.5% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 73.8x | 20.4x | 116.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $6M | $16.37B | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52K | $18M | $7.84B | $14.27B |
CSAI vs CEVA vs QCOM vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLOUDASTRUCTURE, IN… (CSAI) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| CEVA, Inc. (CEVA) | 100 | 114.8 | +14.8% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 642.8 | +542.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CSAI vs CEVA vs QCOM vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CSAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 124.7%, EPS growth 27.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 48.0%
- 124.7% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5%
CEVA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
QCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.7%
- 350.2% 10Y total return vs INTC's 299.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 77.2%, current ratio 2.82x
- Beta 1.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.82x
INTC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +439.7% vs CSAI's -86.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 124.7% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.4x vs 116.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.3% margin vs CSAI's -210.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.55 vs CEVA's 2.76 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +439.7% vs CSAI's -86.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs CSAI's -118.9%, ROIC 29.1% vs -110.6% |
CSAI vs CEVA vs QCOM vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CSAI vs CEVA vs QCOM vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QCOM leads in 4 of 6 categories
INTC leads 1 • CSAI leads 0 • CEVA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INTC is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.8B annually — 14460.9x CSAI's $4M. QCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CSAI's -2.1%. On growth, CSAI holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $108M | $44.5B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$7M | $12.8B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$11M | $9.9B | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$6M | $12.5B | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.0% | +87.2% | +54.8% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -10.1% | +25.5% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -10.5% | +22.3% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -158.2% | -6.0% | +28.1% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +4.3% | -3.5% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.7% | -2.0% | +173.0% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, QCOM's 15.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INTC's 49.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $810M | $213.5B | $550.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $797M | $222.0B | $582.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.29x | -91.14x | 40.43x | -1861.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 73.84x | 20.37x | 116.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 19.44x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 15.91x | 49.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.13x | 7.57x | 4.82x | 10.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.99x | 10.56x | 4.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1569.47x | 16.65x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-148 for CSAI. CEVA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CEVA scores 6/9 vs CSAI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -147.6% | -4.2% | +40.2% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -118.9% | -3.7% | +18.4% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -110.6% | -2.3% | +29.1% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | -2.7% | +28.9% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 0.77x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$52,000 | -$13M | $8.5B | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52,000 | $18M | $7.8B | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $6M | $16.4B | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 17.60x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INTC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INTC five years ago would be worth $19,575 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $172 for CSAI. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +439.7% total return vs CSAI's -86.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INTC at 53.0% vs CSAI's -74.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.7% | +50.4% | +17.6% | +178.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.1% | +59.5% | +42.9% | +439.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | +31.6% | +96.4% | +258.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | -35.4% | +58.5% | +95.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | +27.2% | +350.2% | +299.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.2% | +9.6% | +25.2% | +53.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CEVA and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QCOM is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CEVA's 2.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CEVA currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs CSAI's 12.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.99x | 2.88x | 1.64x | 2.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.55 | $34.87 | $223.66 | $114.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.47 | $17.02 | $121.99 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.8% | +96.7% | +90.6% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 78.9 | 80.1 | 85.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 197K | 498K | 15.1M | 110.6M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CEVA as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -3.6% upside for CEVA (target: $33) vs -27.4% for INTC (target: $80). QCOM is the only dividend payer here at 1.70% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $32.50 | $185.56 | $79.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 69 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 23 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.44 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +4.1% | 0.0% |
QCOM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). INTC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CSAI vs CEVA vs QCOM vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CSAI or CEVA or QCOM or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CLOUDASTRUCTURE, INC.
(CSAI) is the stronger pick with 124. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 40. 4x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CEVA, Inc. (CEVA) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CSAI or CEVA or QCOM or INTC?
On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 20.
4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CSAI or CEVA or QCOM or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, Intel Corporation (INTC) delivered a total return of +95.
8%, compared to -98. 3% for CLOUDASTRUCTURE, INC. (CSAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QCOM returned +382. 4% versus CSAI's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CSAI or CEVA or QCOM or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
64β versus CEVA, Inc. 's 2. 88β — meaning CEVA is approximately 76% more volatile than QCOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CEVA, Inc. (CEVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CSAI or CEVA or QCOM or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CLOUDASTRUCTURE, INC.
(CSAI) is pulling ahead at 124. 7% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intel Corporation grew EPS 98. 7% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSAI leads at 48. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CSAI or CEVA or QCOM or INTC?
QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
5% net margin versus -479. 1% for CLOUDASTRUCTURE, INC. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QCOM leads at 27. 9% versus -448. 6% for CSAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CEVA leads at 88. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CSAI or CEVA or QCOM or INTC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 20.
4x forward P/E versus 116. 5x for Intel Corporation — 96. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CEVA: -3. 6% to $32. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CSAI or CEVA or QCOM or INTC?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CSAI, CEVA, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CSAI or CEVA or QCOM or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
7% yield, +382. 4% 10Y return). CLOUDASTRUCTURE, INC. (CSAI) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QCOM: +382. 4%, CSAI: -98. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CSAI and CEVA and QCOM and INTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CSAI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CEVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. QCOM pays a dividend while CSAI, CEVA, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.