Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CSGP vs Z vs OPEN vs HOUS vs COMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Real Estate - Services
Real Estate - Services
Software - Application
CSGP vs Z vs OPEN vs HOUS vs COMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Internet Content & Information | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $14.44B | $10.77B | $5.19B | $1.98B | $5.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.41B | $2.69B | $4.37B | $5.87B | $8.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $61M | $-1.30B | $-128M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 77.4% | 73.3% | 8.0% | 47.3% | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | -0.8% | 0.4% | -6.6% | 20.3% | -4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 25.2x | 20.1x | — | — | 56.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.14B | $536M | $193M | $3.06B | $454M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.73B | $773M | $962M | $118M | $199M |
CSGP vs Z vs OPEN vs HOUS vs COMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 39.9 | -60.1% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | 100 | 34.2 | -65.8% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 26.8 | -73.2% |
| Anywhere Real Estat… (HOUS) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CSGP vs Z vs OPEN vs HOUS vs COMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CSGP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.80
- 74.0% 10Y total return vs HOUS's -35.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 2.84x
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 2.84x
Z carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (20.1x vs 56.5x)
- 2.3% margin vs OPEN's -29.7%
- 1.1% ROA vs OPEN's -54.0%, ROIC -0.5% vs -16.6%
OPEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +6.8% vs CSGP's -54.3%
HOUS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
COMP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 23.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.1x vs 56.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.3% margin vs OPEN's -29.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.8% vs CSGP's -54.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs OPEN's -54.0%, ROIC -0.5% vs -16.6% |
CSGP vs Z vs OPEN vs HOUS vs COMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CSGP vs Z vs OPEN vs HOUS vs COMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
Z leads in 2 of 6 categories
HOUS leads 1 • CSGP leads 0 • OPEN leads 0 • COMP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Z leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 3.1x Z's $2.7B. Z is the more profitable business, keeping 2.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -29.7%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $2.7B | $4.4B | $5.9B | $8.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $278M | $221M | -$287M | $1.4B | -$100M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $61M | -$1.3B | -$128M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $241M | $433M | $1.0B | -$41M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.4% | +73.3% | +8.0% | +47.3% | +10.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | +0.4% | -6.6% | +20.3% | -4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +2.3% | -29.7% | -2.2% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +16.1% | +23.7% | -0.7% | +0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.5% | +18.4% | -32.1% | +5.9% | +99.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.7% | +5.1% | -7.9% | -2.9% | +133.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HOUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 492.0x trailing earnings, Z trades at a 76% valuation discount to CSGP's 2052.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HOUS's 18.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSGP's 81.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.4B | $10.8B | $5.2B | $2.0B | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.9B | $10.5B | $4.4B | $4.9B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2052.41x | 492.04x | -3.20x | -15.34x | -92.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.16x | 20.10x | — | — | 56.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 81.47x | 40.37x | — | 18.77x | 65.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.45x | 4.17x | 1.19x | 0.35x | 0.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.72x | 2.32x | 4.15x | 1.25x | 6.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 352.19x | 45.84x | 5.00x | 76.08x | 25.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Z leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Z delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-129 for OPEN. Z carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOUS's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), Z scores 7/9 vs HOUS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.3% | +1.3% | -129.4% | -8.4% | +1.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +1.1% | -54.0% | -2.2% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | -0.5% | -16.6% | +1.0% | -2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | -0.6% | -12.3% | +1.4% | -2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.11x | 0.19x | 1.95x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$589M | -$237M | -$769M | $2.9B | $255M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $773M | $962M | $118M | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $536M | $193M | $3.1B | $454M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.58x | 1.22x | — | 0.42x | -0.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HOUS and COMP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOUS five years ago would be worth $9,871 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,054 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +675.8% total return vs CSGP's -54.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 51.8% vs CSGP's -22.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.1% | -32.4% | -10.4% | +26.4% | -12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.3% | -33.7% | +675.8% | +375.5% | +19.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.1% | -7.7% | +165.4% | +227.9% | +250.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.5% | -60.9% | -69.5% | -1.3% | -44.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.0% | +67.2% | -49.6% | -35.0% | -54.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.9% | -2.6% | +38.4% | +48.6% | +51.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CSGP and HOUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOUS currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs CSGP's 35.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.32x | 3.09x | 1.86x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.43 | $93.88 | $10.87 | $18.03 | $13.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.31 | $39.05 | $0.51 | $3.10 | $5.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.0% | +47.4% | +50.0% | +97.8% | +66.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.0 | 47.3 | 51.8 | 77.6 | 42.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.0M | 3.6M | 36.3M | 11.5M | 14.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CSGP as "Buy", Z as "Hold", OPEN as "Hold", HOUS as "Hold", COMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.7% upside for CSGP (target: $62) vs 7.7% for HOUS (target: $19). HOUS is the only dividend payer here at 0.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.91 | $80.00 | $6.50 | $19.00 | $14.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 46 | 26 | 16 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | +6.2% | +22.8% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
Z leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HOUS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CSGP vs Z vs OPEN vs HOUS vs COMP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CSGP or Z or OPEN or HOUS or COMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) offers the better valuation at 492. 0x trailing P/E (20. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CSGP or Z or OPEN or HOUS or COMP?
On trailing P/E, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the cheapest at 492. 0x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2052. 4x. On forward P/E, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C is actually cheaper at 20. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CSGP or Z or OPEN or HOUS or COMP?
Over the past 5 years, Anywhere Real Estate Inc.
(HOUS) delivered a total return of -1. 3%, compared to -69. 5% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSGP returned +74. 0% versus COMP's -54. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CSGP or Z or OPEN or HOUS or COMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 288% more volatile than CSGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 195% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CSGP or Z or OPEN or HOUS or COMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class C grew EPS 118. 9% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSGP leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CSGP or Z or OPEN or HOUS or COMP?
Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOUS leads at 1. 1% versus -6. 6% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSGP leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CSGP or Z or OPEN or HOUS or COMP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) trades at 20. 1x forward P/E versus 56. 5x for Compass, Inc. — 36. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSGP: 81. 7% to $61. 91.
08Which pays a better dividend — CSGP or Z or OPEN or HOUS or COMP?
In this comparison, HOUS (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CSGP, Z, OPEN, COMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CSGP or Z or OPEN or HOUS or COMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80)). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSGP: +74. 0%, OPEN: -49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CSGP and Z and OPEN and HOUS and COMP?
These companies operate in different sectors (CSGP (Real Estate) and Z (Communication Services) and OPEN (Real Estate) and HOUS (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; Z is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 44%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.