CSL vs OC

For growth investors, Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) is the stronger pick with 0.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for Owens Corning (OC). Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Owens Corning is actually cheaper at 13.

0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) delivered a total return of +95.

1%, compared to +24. 0% for Owens Corning (OC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSL returned +277. 4% versus OC's +184. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

12β versus Owens Corning's 1. 41β — meaning OC is approximately 25% more volatile than CSL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Owens Corning (OC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 158% versus 160% for Carlisle Companies Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) is pulling ahead at 0.

3% versus -7. 9% for Owens Corning (OC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carlisle Companies Incorporated grew EPS -38. 6% year-over-year, compared to -185. 1% for Owens Corning. Over a 3-year CAGR, OC leads at 1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

8% net margin versus -5. 2% for Owens Corning — meaning it keeps 14. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSL leads at 19. 9% versus 17. 0% for OC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSL leads at 35. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Owens Corning (OC) trades at 13.

0x forward P/E versus 17. 2x for Carlisle Companies Incorporated — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OC: 15. 9% to $141. 20.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Owens Corning (OC) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 1. 2% for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

12), 1. 2% yield, +277. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSL: +277. 4%, OC: +184. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.