Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CTAS vs ROL vs ARMK vs ABM vs KELYA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CTAS
Cintas Corporation

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$67.28B
5Y Perf.+169.3%
ROL
Rollins, Inc.

Personal Products & Services

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$25.95B
5Y Perf.+93.1%
ARMK
Aramark

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.85B
5Y Perf.+141.2%
ABM
ABM Industries Incorporated

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.36B
5Y Perf.+30.8%
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$355M
5Y Perf.-34.2%

CTAS vs ROL vs ARMK vs ABM vs KELYA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CTAS logoCTAS
ROL logoROL
ARMK logoARMK
ABM logoABM
KELYA logoKELYA
IndustrySpecialty Business ServicesPersonal Products & ServicesSpecialty Business ServicesSpecialty Business ServicesStaffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$67.28B$25.95B$11.85B$2.36B$355M
Revenue (TTM)$10.79B$3.84B$18.79B$8.87B$3.09B
Net Income (TTM)$1.90B$529M$317M$158M$-266M
Gross Margin50.2%51.8%7.0%11.5%26.3%
Operating Margin23.0%19.0%4.2%3.7%-2.8%
Forward P/E34.1x44.2x20.3x10.2x11.2x
Total Debt$2.65B$1.33B$5.72B$1.69B$159M
Cash & Equiv.$264M$100M$639M$104M$33M

CTAS vs ROL vs ARMK vs ABM vs KELYALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CTAS
ROL
ARMK
ABM
KELYA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Cintas Corporation (CTAS)100269.3+169.3%
Rollins, Inc. (ROL)100193.1+93.1%
Aramark (ARMK)100241.2+141.2%
ABM Industries Inco… (ABM)100130.8+30.8%
Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA)10065.8-34.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CTAS vs ROL vs ARMK vs ABM vs KELYA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CTAS and ROL are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Rollins, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. ARMK, ABM, and KELYA also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

CTAS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 6.7% 10Y total return vs ROL's 378.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 2.09x
  • Beta 0.51, yield 0.9%, current ratio 2.09x
  • 17.6% margin vs KELYA's -8.6%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
The Growth Play

ROL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth 13.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
  • 11.0% revenue growth vs KELYA's -1.9%
  • Beta 0.23 vs KELYA's 0.96
Best for: growth exposure
ARMK
Aramark
The Momentum Pick

ARMK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +18.6% vs CTAS's -21.5%
Best for: momentum
ABM
ABM Industries Incorporated
The Income Pick

ABM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 2.6%
  • PEG 0.04 vs ROL's 2.93
  • Lower P/E (10.2x vs 20.3x)
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

KELYA is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 3.2% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ABM's 2.6%
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthROL logoROL11.0% revenue growth vs KELYA's -1.9%
ValueABM logoABMLower P/E (10.2x vs 20.3x)
Quality / MarginsCTAS logoCTAS17.6% margin vs KELYA's -8.6%
Stability / SafetyROL logoROLBeta 0.23 vs KELYA's 0.96
DividendsKELYA logoKELYA3.2% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ABM's 2.6%
Momentum (1Y)ARMK logoARMK+18.6% vs CTAS's -21.5%
Efficiency (ROA)CTAS logoCTAS18.7% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 25.8% vs -4.0%

CTAS vs ROL vs ARMK vs ABM vs KELYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CTASCintas Corporation
FY 2025
Uniform Rental and Facility Services
77.1%$8.0B
First Aid and Safety Services
11.8%$1.2B
Fire Protection Services
7.9%$817M
Uniform Direct Sales
3.2%$329M
ROLRollins, Inc.
FY 2025
Residential Contract Revenue
56.8%$1.7B
Commercial Contract Revenue
41.8%$1.2B
Other Revenues
0.9%$25M
Franchise Revenues
0.5%$16M
ARMKAramark
FY 2024
Food and Support Services - United States
72.3%$12.6B
Food and Support Services - International
27.7%$4.8B
ABMABM Industries Incorporated
FY 2024
Janitorial
64.8%$5.1B
Facility Services
14.8%$1.2B
Building And Energy Solutions
10.2%$809M
Parking
10.2%$805M
KELYAKelly Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Science, Engineering & Technology
55.1%$1.2B
Education
44.9%$1.0B

CTAS vs ROL vs ARMK vs ABM vs KELYA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCTASLAGGINGABM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CTAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ARMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.8B annually — 6.1x KELYA's $3.1B. CTAS is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, ROL holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCTAS logoCTASCintas CorporationROL logoROLRollins, Inc.ARMK logoARMKAramarkABM logoABMABM Industries In…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$10.8B$3.8B$18.8B$8.9B$3.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.9B$858M$1.3B$431M-$54M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.9B$529M$317M$158M-$266M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.8B$621M$257M$327M$66M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+50.2%+51.8%+7.0%+11.5%+26.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.0%+19.0%+4.2%+3.7%-2.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.6%+13.8%+1.7%+1.8%-8.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.5%+16.2%+1.4%+3.7%+2.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.3%+10.2%+6.1%+6.1%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.0%0.0%-7.7%-7.2%-2.1%
CTAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KELYA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.5x trailing earnings, ABM trades at a 69% valuation discount to ROL's 49.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ABM offers better value at 0.05x vs ROL's 3.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCTAS logoCTASCintas CorporationROL logoROLRollins, Inc.ARMK logoARMKAramarkABM logoABMABM Industries In…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…
Market CapShares × price$67.3B$25.9B$11.8B$2.4B$355M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$69.7B$27.2B$16.9B$3.9B$481M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS37.95x49.39x36.95x15.52x-1.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.34.12x44.18x20.27x10.15x11.15x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.27x3.27x0.05x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple24.41x31.82x13.35x9.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.51x6.90x0.64x0.27x0.08x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share14.62x18.96x3.81x1.41x0.35x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF38.29x39.91x26.07x15.19x3.11x
KELYA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CTAS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CTAS delivers a 42.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARMK's 1.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTAS scores 9/9 vs KELYA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCTAS logoCTASCintas CorporationROL logoROLRollins, Inc.ARMK logoARMKAramarkABM logoABMABM Industries In…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+42.6%+36.9%+9.8%+8.8%-24.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+18.7%+16.7%+2.4%+3.0%-11.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+25.8%+23.5%+7.3%+7.5%-4.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+29.8%+32.2%+8.7%+8.2%-4.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–995765
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.57x0.97x1.81x0.95x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.4B$1.2B$5.1B$1.6B$126M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$264M$100M$639M$104M$33M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.7B$1.3B$5.7B$1.7B$159M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense24.61x23.14x2.20x3.25x-12.07x
CTAS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ARMK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CTAS five years ago would be worth $19,239 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,269 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, ARMK leads with a +18.6% total return vs CTAS's -21.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARMK at 23.3% vs KELYA's -12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCTAS logoCTASCintas CorporationROL logoROLRollins, Inc.ARMK logoARMKAramarkABM logoABMABM Industries In…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.4%-8.5%+23.6%-4.5%+15.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-21.5%-3.8%+18.6%-18.6%-18.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.1%+33.7%+87.5%+2.0%-33.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+92.4%+51.9%+72.7%-14.5%-57.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+671.6%+378.0%+97.2%+47.0%-32.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.2%+10.2%+23.3%+0.7%-12.6%
ARMK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ROL and ARMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ROL is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KELYA's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARMK currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs KELYA's 66.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCTAS logoCTASCintas CorporationROL logoROLRollins, Inc.ARMK logoARMKAramarkABM logoABMABM Industries In…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.51x0.23x0.78x0.71x0.96x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$229.24$66.14$46.88$52.94$14.94
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$165.46$52.34$35.07$36.96$7.98
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+72.8%+81.4%+96.2%+75.9%+66.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.544.556.155.859.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.1M2.6M2.2M513K364K
Evenly matched — ROL and ARMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ABM and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CTAS as "Hold", ROL as "Hold", ARMK as "Buy", ABM as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.0% upside for KELYA (target: $15) vs 4.7% for ARMK (target: $47). For income investors, KELYA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.18% vs CTAS's 0.89%.

MetricCTAS logoCTASCintas CorporationROL logoROLRollins, Inc.ARMK logoARMKAramarkABM logoABMABM Industries In…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$223.40$63.75$47.20$50.00$15.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts301724115
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+1.3%+0.9%+2.6%+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3231365
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.49$0.68$0.41$1.05$0.31
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.4%+0.8%+1.2%+5.2%+3.5%
Evenly matched — ABM and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CTAS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KELYA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCintas Corporation (CTAS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CTAS vs ROL vs ARMK vs ABM vs KELYA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CTAS or ROL or ARMK or ABM or KELYA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aramark (ARMK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CTAS or ROL or ARMK or ABM or KELYA?

On trailing P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the cheapest at 15.

5x versus Rollins, Inc. at 49. 4x. On forward P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated is actually cheaper at 10. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ABM Industries Incorporated wins at 0. 04x versus Rollins, Inc. 's 2. 93x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CTAS or ROL or ARMK or ABM or KELYA?

Over the past 5 years, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) delivered a total return of +92.

4%, compared to -57. 3% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTAS returned +671. 6% versus KELYA's -32. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CTAS or ROL or ARMK or ABM or KELYA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Kelly Services, Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning KELYA is approximately 314% more volatile than ROL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 181% for Aramark — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CTAS or ROL or ARMK or ABM or KELYA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus -1. 9% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ABM Industries Incorporated grew EPS 102. 3% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROL leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CTAS or ROL or ARMK or ABM or KELYA?

Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

5% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTAS leads at 22. 8% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTAS leads at 50. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CTAS or ROL or ARMK or ABM or KELYA more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus Rollins, Inc. 's 2. 93x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 44. 2x for Rollins, Inc. — 34. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KELYA: 52. 0% to $15. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CTAS or ROL or ARMK or ABM or KELYA?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 0. 9% for Cintas Corporation (CTAS).

09

Is CTAS or ROL or ARMK or ABM or KELYA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 1. 3% yield, +378. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ROL: +378. 0%, KELYA: -32. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CTAS and ROL and ARMK and ABM and KELYA?

These companies operate in different sectors (CTAS (Industrials) and ROL (Consumer Cyclical) and ARMK (Industrials) and ABM (Industrials) and KELYA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CTAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ROL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ARMK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ABM is a small-cap deep-value stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CTAS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ROL

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARMK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ABM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KELYA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CTAS and ROL and ARMK and ABM and KELYA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CTAS: 9.3% · ROL: 10.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(CTAS: 17.6% · ROL: 13.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CTAS: 37.9x · ROL: 49.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.