Media & Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CTCT vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
CTCT vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Media & Entertainment | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $362M | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 73.1% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 72.8x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $30.71B |
Quick Verdict: CTCT vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth 91.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 3.17x
- current ratio 3.17x
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (29.6x vs 72.8x)
- 37.9% margin vs CTCT's 5.5%
- 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.2% revenue growth vs GOOGL's 15.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.6x vs 72.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs CTCT's 5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (4.6% vs 14.3%) | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs CTCT's 5.7%, ROIC 25.1% vs 9.0% |
CTCT vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTCT vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 1167.8x CTCT's $362M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTCT's 5.5%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $362M | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $52M | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.1% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.8% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.8x trailing earnings, GOOGL trades at a 49% valuation discount to CTCT's 72.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CTCT's 21.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GOOGL's 32.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 72.75x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.26x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.08x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.98x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.89x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CTCT and GOOGL each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $7 for CTCT. CTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOGL's 0.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTCT scores 8/9 vs GOOGL's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$92M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Risk & Volatility
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | — | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | — | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | — | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CTCT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CTCT vs GOOGL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTCT or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) is the stronger pick with 16. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 1% for Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL). Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (29. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) a "Buy" — based on 82 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTCT or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the cheapest at 36. 8x versus Constant Contact, Inc. at 72. 8x.
03Which is safer — CTCT or GOOGL?
On balance sheet safety, Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 14% for Alphabet Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CTCT or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) is pulling ahead at 16. 2% versus 15. 1% for Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Constant Contact, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to 34. 5% for Alphabet Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTCT leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTCT or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus 4. 3% for Constant Contact, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus 6. 0% for CTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTCT leads at 72. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CTCT or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CTCT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CTCT or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CTCT and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (CTCT (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare GOOGL vs META
META is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GOOGL.
Compare CTCT vs HUBS
HUBS is one of the most direct listed alternatives to CTCT.
Expand With META + MSFT
META and MSFT are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.