CTCT
Constant Contact, Inc.
Media & Entertainment
Market Cap$1.02B
5Y Perf.—
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CTCT vs HUBS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$12.58B
5Y Perf.-13.7%
CTCT vs HUBS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CTCT | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Media & Entertainment | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $12.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $362M | $3.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $100M |
| Gross Margin | 73.1% | 83.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 72.8x | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $485M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $882M |
Quick Verdict: CTCT vs HUBS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CTCT leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. HubSpot, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CTCT
Constant Contact, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
CTCT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 3.17x
- current ratio 3.17x
- 5.5% margin vs HUBS's 3.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
The Growth Play
HUBS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
- 19.2% revenue growth vs CTCT's 16.2%
- Lower P/E (19.6x vs 72.8x)
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HUBS | 19.2% revenue growth vs CTCT's 16.2% |
| Value | HUBS | Lower P/E (19.6x vs 72.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | CTCT | 5.5% margin vs HUBS's 3.0% |
| Stability / Safety | CTCT | Lower D/E ratio (4.6% vs 23.5%) |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CTCT | 5.7% ROA vs HUBS's 2.7%, ROIC 9.0% vs 0.4% |
CTCT vs HUBS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
CTCT vs HUBS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCTCTLAGGINGHUBS
HUBSHubSpot, Inc.
1leads
CTCTConstant Contact, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HUBSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
HUBS4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CTCT4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CTCT7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
—
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
—
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 9.1x CTCT's $362M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.5% (CTCT) to 3.0% (HUBS). On growth, HUBS holds the edge at +23.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CTCTConstant Contact,… | HUBSHubSpot, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $362M | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $52M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $100M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $712M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.1% | +83.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +21.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +23.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.8% | +2.5% |
HUBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 72.8x trailing earnings, CTCT trades at a 74% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CTCT's 21.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUBS's 69.2x.
| Metric | CTCTConstant Contact,… | HUBSHubSpot, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $12.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 72.75x | 284.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.26x | 69.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.08x | 4.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.98x | 6.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.89x | 17.77x |
CTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTCT leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTCT delivers a 7.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $5 for HUBS. CTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HUBS's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTCT scores 8/9 vs HUBS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CTCTConstant Contact,… | HUBSHubSpot, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +0.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$92M | -$397M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $882M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $485M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4753.07x |
CTCT leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
| Metric | CTCTConstant Contact,… | HUBSHubSpot, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -36.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | -62.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -45.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -52.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +469.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -18.1% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Risk & Volatility
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Risk & Volatility
| Metric | CTCTConstant Contact,… | HUBSHubSpot, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | — | $682.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | — | $187.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +35.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | — | 1.5M |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | CTCTConstant Contact,… | HUBSHubSpot, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $360.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +4.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CTCT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HUBS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
Best OverallConstant Contact, Inc. (CTCT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CTCT vs HUBS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTCT or HUBS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the stronger pick with 19. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 2% for Constant Contact, Inc. (CTCT). Constant Contact, Inc. (CTCT) offers the better valuation at 72. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTCT or HUBS?
On trailing P/E, Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) is the cheapest at 72. 8x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x.
03Which is safer — CTCT or HUBS?
On balance sheet safety, Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 23% for HubSpot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CTCT or HUBS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is pulling ahead at 19. 2% versus 16. 2% for Constant Contact, Inc. (CTCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to 91. 3% for Constant Contact, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HUBS leads at 21. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTCT or HUBS?
Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 3% net margin versus 1. 5% for HubSpot, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTCT leads at 6. 0% versus 0. 4% for HUBS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CTCT or HUBS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CTCT or HUBS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +469. 1% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CTCT and HUBS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CTCT: 10.0% · HUBS: 23.4%)Net Margin>
%
(CTCT: 5.5% · HUBS: 3.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CTCT: 72.8x · HUBS: 284.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.