Media & Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CTCT vs MCHP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
CTCT vs MCHP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Media & Entertainment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $54.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $362M | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $-97M |
| Gross Margin | 73.1% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 72.8x | 64.8x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $5.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $772M |
Quick Verdict: CTCT vs MCHP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTCT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth 91.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 3.17x
- current ratio 3.17x
MCHP is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (64.8x vs 72.8x)
- 1.8% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.2% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (64.8x vs 72.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (4.6% vs 80.0%) | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 9.0% vs 1.8% |
CTCT vs MCHP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTCT vs MCHP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CTCT and MCHP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCHP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 12.1x CTCT's $362M. CTCT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, MCHP holds the edge at +15.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $362M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $52M | $881M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | -$97M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $820M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.1% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.8% | +164.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CTCT's 21.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MCHP's 57.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $55.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $59.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 72.75x | -9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 64.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.26x | 57.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.08x | 12.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.98x | 7.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.89x | 71.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CTCT leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTCT delivers a 7.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. CTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MCHP's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTCT scores 8/9 vs MCHP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$92M | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $772M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +56.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | +115.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +43.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +45.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +373.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Risk & Volatility
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | — | $103.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | — | $46.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 82.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | — | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
MCHP is the only dividend payer here at 1.79% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $87.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.2% |
CTCT leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
CTCT vs MCHP: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTCT or MCHP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) is the stronger pick with 16. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Constant Contact, Inc. (CTCT) offers the better valuation at 72. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — CTCT or MCHP?
On balance sheet safety, Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 80% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — CTCT or MCHP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) is pulling ahead at 16. 2% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Constant Contact, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTCT leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — CTCT or MCHP?
Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 3% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCHP leads at 6. 7% versus 6. 0% for CTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTCT leads at 72. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — CTCT or MCHP?
In this comparison, MCHP (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. CTCT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is CTCT or MCHP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
8% yield, +373. 8% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between CTCT and MCHP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MCHP pays a dividend while CTCT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.