Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CTLP vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
CTLP vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $826M | $5.05T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $318M | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 39.0% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 27.3x | 25.1x |
| Total Debt | $49M | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $10.61B |
CTLP vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2338.6 | +2238.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTLP vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTLP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.38
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 19.2%, current ratio 1.86x
- Beta 0.38, current ratio 1.86x
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 234.3% 10Y total return vs CTLP's 147.8%
- 65.5% revenue growth vs CTLP's 12.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs CTLP's 12.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.1x vs 27.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs CTLP's 17.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs NVDA's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.9% vs CTLP's +37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs CTLP's 14.4%, ROIC 81.8% vs 7.9% |
CTLP vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CTLP vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 680.0x CTLP's $318M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTLP's 17.3%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $318M | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $39M | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.0% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.5% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CTLP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, CTLP trades at a 69% valuation discount to NVDA's 42.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CTLP's 20.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVDA's 37.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $826M | $5.05T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $823M | $5.05T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.02x | 42.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.32x | 25.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.51x | 37.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 23.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.30x | 32.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 247.43x | 52.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $22 for CTLP. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CTLP's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTLP scores 6/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.8% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.4% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $49M | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.98x | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $143,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,290 for CTLP. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +82.9% total return vs CTLP's +37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 92.4% vs CTLP's 18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.3% | +82.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.9% | +612.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.9% | +1331.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.8% | +23433.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | +92.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CTLP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTLP is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTLP currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs NVDA's 95.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.20 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.57 | $110.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.8 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 166.2M |
Analyst Outlook
NVDA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CTLP as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.3% upside for NVDA (target: $279) vs -1.8% for CTLP (target: $11).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CTLP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
CTLP vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTLP or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 6% for Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP). Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (27. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTLP or NVDA?
On trailing P/E, Cantaloupe, Inc.
(CTLP) is the cheapest at 13. 0x versus NVIDIA Corporation at 42. 4x. On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTLP or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1331%, compared to +12.
9% for Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +234. 3% versus CTLP's +147. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTLP or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cantaloupe, Inc.
(CTLP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning NVDA is approximately 357% more volatile than CTLP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 19% for Cantaloupe, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTLP or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 12. 6% for Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cantaloupe, Inc. grew EPS 473. 3% year-over-year, compared to 66. 7% for NVIDIA Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTLP or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus 21. 3% for Cantaloupe, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 7. 4% for CTLP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTLP or NVDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 25.
1x forward P/E versus 27. 3x for Cantaloupe, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 34. 3% to $278. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTLP or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CTLP or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cantaloupe, Inc.
(CTLP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), +147. 8% 10Y return). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTLP: +147. 8%, NVDA: +234. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTLP and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTLP is a small-cap deep-value stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.