Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CTMX vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
CTMX vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $703M | $362.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $76M | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | 99.3% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -29.3% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $5.23B |
CTMX vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CytomX Therapeutics… (CTMX) | 100 | 46.6 | -53.4% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 221.2 | +121.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTMX vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTMX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +327.4% vs ABBV's +13.1%
ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- 306.7% 10Y total return vs CTMX's -65.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs CTMX's -44.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs CTMX's -22.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs CTMX's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CTMX's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +327.4% vs ABBV's +13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs CTMX's -11.9%, ROIC 23.9% vs -47.7% |
CTMX vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTMX vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.2B annually — 802.6x CTMX's $76M. ABBV is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTMX's -22.8%. On growth, ABBV holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $76M | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$76M | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.3% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.8% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -99.5% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.3% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -170.8% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CTMX and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $703M | $362.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $694M | $426.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -27.53x | 86.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.22x | 5.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.75x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-20 for CTMX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs CTMX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.8% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.9% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -47.7% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.0% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CTMX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,276 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,067 for CTMX. Over the past 12 months, CTMX leads with a +327.4% total return vs ABBV's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTMX at 35.0% vs ABBV's 15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.8% | -9.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +327.4% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.8% | +52.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | +102.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.9% | +306.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.0% | +15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CTMX's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABBV currently trades 83.7% from its 52-week high vs CTMX's 50.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.20 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.90 | $176.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.4% | +83.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 48.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.3M | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CTMX as "Buy" and ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 180.9% upside for CTMX (target: $12) vs 25.2% for ABBV (target: $257). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs CTMX's 0.53%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.60 | $256.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
ABBV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CTMX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CTMX vs ABBV: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTMX or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -44. 8% for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX). AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) offers the better valuation at 86. 5x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CTMX or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +102. 8%, compared to -49. 3% for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +306. 7% versus CTMX's -65. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CTMX or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning CTMX is approximately 337% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CTMX or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -44. 8% for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AbbVie Inc. grew EPS -0. 8% year-over-year, compared to -139. 5% for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTMX leads at 12. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTMX or ABBV?
AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -22. 8% for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -25. 7% for CTMX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTMX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CTMX or ABBV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CTMX: 180.
9% to $11. 60.
07Which pays a better dividend — CTMX or ABBV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 0. 5% for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX).
08Is CTMX or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +306. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +306. 7%, CTMX: -65. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CTMX and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTMX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.