Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CTNT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs LFMD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Medical - Pharmaceuticals
CTNT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs LFMD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Medical - Pharmaceuticals |
| Market Cap | $40K | $8M | $19.73B | $215M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $115M | $127M | $219M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-53M | $-289M | $-17M |
| Gross Margin | -44.2% | 64.3% | 25.8% | 86.7% |
| Operating Margin | -355.1% | -44.2% | -68.3% | -5.9% |
| Total Debt | $1M | $46M | $24M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $233K | $847K | $87M | $37M |
CTNT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs LFMD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheetah Net Supply … (CTNT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 2.9 | -97.1% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 254.3 | +154.3% |
| LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) | 100 | 116.3 | +16.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTNT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs LFMD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 182.7%, EPS growth 57.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -71.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 13.0%, current ratio 6.74x
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 6.74x
- 182.7% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
AIXI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BBAI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.31
- +36.7% vs CTNT's -99.1%
LFMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 220.7% 10Y total return vs BBAI's -57.6%
- -7.8% margin vs CTNT's -283.2%
- 1.5% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- -24.3% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 182.7% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -7.8% margin vs CTNT's -283.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.7% vs CTNT's -99.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -24.3% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3% |
CTNT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs LFMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTNT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs LFMD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LFMD leads in 2 of 6 categories
BBAI leads 2 • CTNT leads 1 • AIXI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LFMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LFMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $219M annually — 170.3x CTNT's $1M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -7.8% (LFMD) to -2.8% (CTNT). On growth, CTNT holds the edge at +106.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $115M | $127M | $219M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$49M | -$75M | -$5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$53M | -$289M | -$17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2,079 | -$2M | -$56M | $15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -44.2% | +64.3% | +25.8% | +86.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -44.2% | -68.3% | -5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | -45.9% | -2.3% | -7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | -2.0% | -44.3% | +6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.6% | -64.9% | -0.9% | -23.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.9% | -29.9% | +52.0% | -16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CTNT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $40,301 | $8M | $19.7B | $215M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $53M | $19.7B | $185M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -0.45x | -5.09x | -19.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 0.11x | 154.51x | 1.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | — | 24.45x | 8.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.02x | — | — | 33.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BBAI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTNT delivers a -34.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-34 in annual profit, vs $-162 for LFMD. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LFMD's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LFMD scores 5/9 vs BBAI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.1% | — | -50.7% | -162.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.5% | -65.3% | -35.3% | -24.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.3% | -34.4% | -19.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -30.7% | -3.4% | -19.6% | -37.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | — | 0.04x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $981,698 | $45M | -$63M | -$30M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $233,217 | $846,593 | $87M | $37M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $46M | $24M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -103.70x | -14.13x | -18.17x | -6.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LFMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LFMD five years ago would be worth $5,423 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for CTNT. Over the past 12 months, BBAI leads with a +36.7% total return vs CTNT's -99.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LFMD at 40.8% vs CTNT's -95.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.9% | +68.1% | -28.6% | +28.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.1% | -79.2% | +36.7% | -43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -98.6% | +49.5% | +178.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -98.6% | -56.9% | -45.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -98.6% | -57.6% | +220.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -95.2% | -75.9% | +14.3% | +40.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CTNT and BBAI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BBAI currently trades 44.4% from its 52-week high vs CTNT's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.94x | 3.31x | 2.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $462.00 | $4.02 | $9.39 | $15.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.12 | $0.08 | $2.96 | $2.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.5% | +18.0% | +44.4% | +28.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 20.6 | 49.3 | 63.3 | 70.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 127.1M | 60.6M | 34.6M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
BBAI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBAI as "Hold", LFMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 89.3% upside for LFMD (target: $9) vs 43.9% for BBAI (target: $6). LFMD is the only dividend payer here at 1.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $6.00 | $8.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 4 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LFMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BBAI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CTNT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs LFMD: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTNT or AIXI or BBAI or LFMD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc.
(CTNT) is the stronger pick with 182. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Analysts rate LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CTNT or AIXI or BBAI or LFMD?
Over the past 5 years, LifeMD, Inc.
(LFMD) delivered a total return of -45. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. (CTNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LFMD returned +220. 7% versus CTNT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CTNT or AIXI or BBAI or LFMD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc.
(CTNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 279% more volatile than CTNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 27% for LifeMD, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CTNT or AIXI or BBAI or LFMD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc.
(CTNT) is pulling ahead at 182. 7% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. grew EPS 57. 7% year-over-year, compared to 35. 4% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTNT or AIXI or BBAI or LFMD?
LifeMD, Inc.
(LFMD) is the more profitable company, earning -3. 7% net margin versus -283. 2% for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. — meaning it keeps -3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LFMD leads at -4. 0% versus -298. 4% for CTNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LFMD leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CTNT or AIXI or BBAI or LFMD?
In this comparison, LFMD (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. CTNT, AIXI, BBAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CTNT or AIXI or BBAI or LFMD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc.
(CTNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTNT: -100. 0%, BBAI: -57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CTNT and AIXI and BBAI and LFMD?
These companies operate in different sectors (CTNT (Consumer Cyclical) and AIXI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and LFMD (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CTNT is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LFMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LFMD pays a dividend while CTNT, AIXI, BBAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.