Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CTOS vs URI vs KFRC vs FTAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Rental & Leasing Services
CTOS vs URI vs KFRC vs FTAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Rental & Leasing Services |
| Market Cap | $2.22B | $59.14B | $790M | $27.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.98B | $16.36B | $1.33B | $2.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $2.51B | $35M | $537M |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | 36.3% | 27.2% | 31.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | 24.7% | 3.8% | 28.2% |
| Forward P/E | 118.5x | 20.1x | 18.0x | 37.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.42B | $16.48B | $70M | $3.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $459M | $2M | $300M |
CTOS vs URI vs KFRC vs FTAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Custom Truck One So… (CTOS) | 100 | 394.4 | +294.4% |
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 679.7 | +579.7% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) | 100 | 2836.0 | +2736.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTOS vs URI vs KFRC vs FTAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTOS plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
URI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Lower P/E (18.0x vs 37.1x)
FTAI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 43.2%, EPS growth 15.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 51.4%
- 33.3% 10Y total return vs URI's 14.8%
- 43.2% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- 18.9% margin vs CTOS's -0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.2% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.0x vs 37.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.9% margin vs CTOS's -0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs FTAI's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs URI's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.0% vs KFRC's +18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs CTOS's -0.5%, ROIC 16.8% vs 3.3% |
CTOS vs URI vs KFRC vs FTAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CTOS vs URI vs KFRC vs FTAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories
FTAI leads 2 • CTOS leads 0 • URI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTAI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 12.3x KFRC's $1.3B. FTAI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTOS's -0.9%. On growth, FTAI holds the edge at +65.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $16.4B | $1.3B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $375M | $6.5B | $56M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $2.5B | $35M | $537M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | $1.5B | $43M | -$1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +36.3% | +27.2% | +31.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +24.7% | +3.8% | +28.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +15.3% | +2.6% | +18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +9.1% | +3.3% | -48.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +7.2% | +0.1% | +65.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +74.3% | +5.6% | +2.2% | +48.3% |
Valuation Metrics
KFRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, KFRC trades at a 63% valuation discount to FTAI's 59.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, URI's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FTAI's 31.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $59.1B | $790M | $28.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $75.2B | $858M | $31.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -69.86x | 24.45x | 22.05x | 59.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 118.55x | 20.14x | 17.96x | 37.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.94x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.29x | 10.61x | 15.42x | 31.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.14x | 3.67x | 0.59x | 11.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.74x | 6.80x | 6.17x | 84.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 89.34x | 16.88x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI delivers a 181.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $181 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CTOS. KFRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTAI's 10.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTOS scores 6/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | +27.9% | +27.2% | +181.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | +8.4% | +9.2% | +12.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +12.4% | +19.1% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +15.6% | +20.1% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.99x | 1.84x | 0.56x | 10.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $16.0B | $68M | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $459M | $2M | $300M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $16.5B | $70M | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.98x | 5.72x | — | 3.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTAI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTAI five years ago would be worth $114,680 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,325 for KFRC. Over the past 12 months, FTAI leads with a +149.0% total return vs KFRC's +18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTAI at 115.8% vs KFRC's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.6% | +12.0% | +39.2% | +29.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.4% | +46.0% | +18.9% | +149.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.5% | +182.8% | -13.8% | +905.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | +178.0% | -16.8% | +1046.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.2% | +1482.5% | +195.5% | +3325.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | +41.4% | -4.8% | +115.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CTOS and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTAI's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTOS currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs FTAI's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 1.19x | 0.53x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.21 | $1021.47 | $47.48 | $323.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.07 | $647.05 | $24.49 | $105.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +92.4% | +91.0% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.1 | 69.4 | 65.6 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 956K | 557K | 305K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CTOS as "Buy", URI as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", FTAI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 9.2% for FTAI (target: $298). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs FTAI's 0.45%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | $1037.13 | $71.00 | $297.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 40 | 10 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +3.6% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 8 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $7.18 | $1.55 | $1.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +3.3% | +6.4% | +0.4% |
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FTAI leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CTOS vs URI vs KFRC vs FTAI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTOS or URI or KFRC or FTAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) is the stronger pick with 43. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Custom Truck One Source, Inc. (CTOS) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTOS or URI or KFRC or FTAI?
On trailing P/E, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus FTAI Aviation Ltd. at 59. 2x. On forward P/E, Kforce Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTOS or URI or KFRC or FTAI?
Over the past 5 years, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) delivered a total return of +1047%, compared to -16. 8% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTAI returned +33. 3% versus CTOS's -0. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTOS or URI or KFRC or FTAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus FTAI Aviation Ltd. 's 1. 79β — meaning FTAI is approximately 238% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kforce Inc. (KFRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 10% for FTAI Aviation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTOS or URI or KFRC or FTAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) is pulling ahead at 43. 2% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FTAI Aviation Ltd. grew EPS 1538% year-over-year, compared to -25. 2% for Kforce Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTAI leads at 51. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTOS or URI or KFRC or FTAI?
FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 0% net margin versus -1. 6% for Custom Truck One Source, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTAI leads at 30. 7% versus 3. 8% for KFRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — URI leads at 35. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTOS or URI or KFRC or FTAI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) trades at 18. 0x forward P/E versus 118. 5x for Custom Truck One Source, Inc. — 100. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTOS or URI or KFRC or FTAI?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
6% yield), URI (0. 8% yield), FTAI (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CTOS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CTOS or URI or KFRC or FTAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 0. 8% yield, +1483% 10Y return). FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (URI: +1483%, FTAI: +33. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTOS and URI and KFRC and FTAI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTOS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; URI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FTAI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. URI, KFRC pay a dividend while CTOS, FTAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.