CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$24.72B
5Y Perf.+64.1%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CTRA vs FANG vs DVN vs SM vs COP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$53.08B
5Y Perf.+382.9%
DVN
Devon Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$28.34B
5Y Perf.+375.2%
SM
SM Energy Company
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$3.39B
5Y Perf.+781.5%
COP
ConocoPhillips
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$138.72B
5Y Perf.+198.2%
CTRA vs FANG vs DVN vs SM vs COP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CTRA | FANG | DVN | SM | COP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $24.72B | $53.08B | $28.34B | $3.39B | $138.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.48B | $15.19B | $12.24B | $3.79B | $58.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.67B | $403M | $2.15B | $131M | $7.32B |
| Gross Margin | 40.6% | 41.8% | 21.8% | 45.1% | 29.2% |
| Operating Margin | 30.7% | 22.1% | 18.9% | 6.5% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.3x | 10.1x | 8.3x | 4.3x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.01B | $14.49B | $8.78B | $2.30B | $23.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $106M | $1.43B | $368M | $6.50B |
CTRA vs FANG vs DVN vs SM vs COP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CTRA
FANG
DVN
SM
COP
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 100 | 164.1 | +64.1% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | 100 | 482.9 | +382.9% |
| Devon Energy Corpor… (DVN) | 100 | 475.2 | +375.2% |
| SM Energy Company (SM) | 100 | 881.5 | +781.5% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 100 | 298.2 | +198.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTRA vs FANG vs DVN vs SM vs COP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: DVN and SM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. SM Energy Company is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. CTRA, FANG, and COP also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
The Quality Compounder
CTRA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 25.7% margin vs FANG's 2.7%
Best for: quality
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
The Growth Play
FANG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth -63.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- 36.3% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6%
Best for: growth exposure
DVN
Devon Energy Corporation
The Momentum Pick
DVN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in momentum and efficiency.
- +45.9% vs COP's +31.8%
- 9.1% ROA vs FANG's 0.6%, ROIC 12.3% vs 6.7%
Best for: momentum and efficiency
SM
SM Energy Company
The Value Play
SM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 12.6x)
- 2.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs COP's 2.8%
Best for: value and dividends
COP
ConocoPhillips
The Income Pick
COP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 2.8%
- 230.8% 10Y total return vs FANG's 160.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 36.4%, current ratio 1.30x
- Beta 0.01, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.30x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FANG | 36.3% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6% |
| Value | SM | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 12.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | CTRA | 25.7% margin vs FANG's 2.7% |
| Stability / Safety | COP | Beta 0.01 vs SM's 0.07, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SM | 2.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs COP's 2.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | DVN | +45.9% vs COP's +31.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DVN | 9.1% ROA vs FANG's 0.6%, ROIC 12.3% vs 6.7% |
CTRA vs FANG vs DVN vs SM vs COP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
CTRA vs FANG vs DVN vs SM vs COP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCTRALAGGINGCOP
Who Leads Where
CTRA leads in 1 of 6 categories
SM leads 1 • DVN leads 1 • FANG leads 1 • COP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓COPConocoPhillips
0leads
SMSM Energy Company
1leads
DVNDevon Energy Corporat…
1leads
FANGDiamondback Energy, I…
1leads
CTRACoterra Energy Inc.
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FANGvs DVNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CTRA4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SM6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
DVN4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FANG3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COP is the larger business by revenue, generating $58.3B annually — 15.4x SM's $3.8B. CTRA is the more profitable business, keeping 25.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FANG's 2.7%. On growth, SM holds the edge at +76.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | FANGDiamondback Energ… | DVNDevon Energy Corp… | SMSM Energy Company | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.5B | $15.2B | $12.2B | $3.8B | $58.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.4B | $8.6B | $5.0B | $1.6B | $22.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $403M | $2.1B | $131M | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $1.6B | $2.1B | -$226M | $18.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +41.8% | +21.8% | +45.1% | +29.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | +22.1% | +18.9% | +6.5% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +2.7% | +17.6% | +3.4% | +12.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +40.8% | +10.5% | +16.8% | -5.9% | +31.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.3% | +5.2% | -99.9% | +76.2% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.3% | -98.3% | -100.0% | -2.8% | -20.2% |
CTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, SM trades at a 84% valuation discount to FANG's 32.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SM's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FANG's 6.8x.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | FANGDiamondback Energ… | DVNDevon Energy Corp… | SMSM Energy Company | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24.7B | $53.1B | $28.3B | $3.4B | $138.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.6B | $67.5B | $35.7B | $5.3B | $155.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.47x | 32.93x | 10.86x | 5.22x | 17.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.28x | 10.10x | 8.30x | 4.33x | 12.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.41x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.93x | 6.78x | 4.81x | 2.62x | 6.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.99x | 3.53x | 1.66x | 1.07x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.67x | 1.27x | 1.85x | 0.70x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.13x | 10.14x | 9.09x | 5.91x | 8.27x |
SM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DVN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DVN delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $1 for FANG. CTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DVN's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SM scores 7/9 vs FANG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | FANGDiamondback Energ… | DVNDevon Energy Corp… | SMSM Energy Company | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.3% | +0.9% | +18.6% | +2.5% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | +0.6% | +9.1% | +1.1% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +6.7% | +12.3% | +8.9% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +7.6% | +13.8% | +10.4% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.34x | 0.57x | 0.48x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | $14.4B | $7.3B | $1.9B | $16.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $106M | $1.4B | $368M | $6.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.0B | $14.5B | $8.8B | $2.3B | $23.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.88x | 0.66x | 7.98x | 1.37x | 9.42x |
DVN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FANG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth $26,624 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,160 for SM. Over the past 12 months, DVN leads with a +45.9% total return vs COP's +31.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FANG at 16.0% vs DVN's -0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | FANGDiamondback Energ… | DVNDevon Energy Corp… | SMSM Energy Company | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.2% | +24.6% | +21.1% | +55.0% | +18.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.6% | +41.5% | +45.9% | +32.5% | +31.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.2% | +56.2% | -1.5% | +20.0% | +22.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.4% | +166.2% | +122.9% | +91.6% | +130.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.7% | +160.5% | +99.8% | +135.0% | +230.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.2% | +16.0% | -0.5% | +6.3% | +7.0% |
FANG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CTRA and SM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTRA is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SM's 0.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SM currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs COP's 83.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | FANGDiamondback Energ… | DVNDevon Energy Corp… | SMSM Energy Company | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.15x | -0.02x | -0.06x | 0.07x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.88 | $214.51 | $52.71 | $33.25 | $135.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.33 | $130.48 | $30.24 | $17.45 | $84.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +88.0% | +86.5% | +88.5% | +83.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.4 | 45.4 | 39.8 | 49.8 | 38.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.0M | 3.4M | 15.4M | 5.6M | 9.6M |
Evenly matched — CTRA and SM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SM and COP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CTRA as "Buy", FANG as "Buy", DVN as "Buy", SM as "Buy", COP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.2% upside for DVN (target: $56) vs -1.5% for SM (target: $29). For income investors, COP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs FANG's 2.12%.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | FANGDiamondback Energ… | DVNDevon Energy Corp… | SMSM Energy Company | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $210.79 | $56.18 | $29.00 | $126.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 55 | 51 | 64 | 54 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +2.1% | +2.2% | +2.7% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.90 | $4.00 | $0.98 | $0.80 | $3.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +3.8% | +3.7% | +0.4% | +3.6% |
Evenly matched — SM and COP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CTRA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallCoterra Energy Inc. (CTRA)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CTRA vs FANG vs DVN vs SM vs COP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTRA or FANG or DVN or SM or COP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). SM Energy Company (SM) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (4. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTRA or FANG or DVN or SM or COP?
On trailing P/E, SM Energy Company (SM) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus Diamondback Energy, Inc. at 32. 9x. On forward P/E, SM Energy Company is actually cheaper at 4. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTRA or FANG or DVN or SM or COP?
Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) delivered a total return of +166. 2%, compared to +91. 6% for SM Energy Company (SM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COP returned +230. 8% versus CTRA's +68. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTRA or FANG or DVN or SM or COP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 15β versus SM Energy Company's 0. 07β — meaning SM is approximately -146% more volatile than CTRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 57% for Devon Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTRA or FANG or DVN or SM or COP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coterra Energy Inc. grew EPS 49. 0% year-over-year, compared to -63. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTRA or FANG or DVN or SM or COP?
Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 4% net margin versus 11. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTRA leads at 89. 1% versus 19. 6% for COP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTRA leads at 60. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTRA or FANG or DVN or SM or COP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SM Energy Company (SM) trades at 4.
3x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for ConocoPhillips — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DVN: 23. 2% to $56. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTRA or FANG or DVN or SM or COP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ConocoPhillips (COP) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 2. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
09Is CTRA or FANG or DVN or SM or COP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 15), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTRA: +68. 7%, SM: +135. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTRA and FANG and DVN and SM and COP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTRA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DVN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SM is a small-cap high-growth stock; COP is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CTRA: -43.3% · FANG: 5.2%)Net Margin>
%
(CTRA: 25.7% · FANG: 2.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CTRA: 14.5x · FANG: 32.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.