Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CTRN vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
CTRN vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $403M | $35M | $53M | $19.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $801M | $442M | $660M | $11.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $-8M | $-10M | $610M |
| Gross Margin | 37.8% | 44.4% | 32.2% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | -2.3% | -2.4% | 8.9% |
| Forward P/E | 44.1x | — | — | 31.3x |
| Total Debt | $220M | $0.00 | $146M | $3.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $24M | $20M | $1.23B |
CTRN vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN) | 100 | 290.5 | +190.5% |
| Destination XL Grou… (DXLG) | 100 | 149.8 | +49.8% |
| The Cato Corporation (CATO) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| Burlington Stores, … (BURL) | 100 | 146.2 | +46.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTRN vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTRN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +105.1% vs DXLG's -35.6%
DXLG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CATO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 89.9%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.88, yield 18.7%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.88 vs DXLG's 2.30
- 18.7% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
BURL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.30
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 440.2% 10Y total return vs CTRN's 176.4%
- 8.9% revenue growth vs CATO's -8.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.9% revenue growth vs CATO's -8.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs CTRN's -2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs DXLG's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 18.7% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +105.1% vs DXLG's -35.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs CTRN's -3.6%, ROIC 10.3% vs -10.1% |
CTRN vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTRN vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BURL leads in 3 of 6 categories
DXLG leads 1 • CTRN leads 1 • CATO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BURL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BURL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 26.2x DXLG's $442M. BURL is the more profitable business, keeping 5.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTRN's -2.0%. On growth, BURL holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $801M | $442M | $660M | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $5M | -$5M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | -$8M | -$10M | $610M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | -$11M | -$7M | $232M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +44.4% | +32.2% | +41.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | -2.3% | -2.4% | +8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -1.7% | -1.5% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | -2.6% | -1.1% | +2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | -5.2% | +6.3% | +11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -137.7% | +64.6% | +20.4% |
Valuation Metrics
DXLG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $403M | $35M | $53M | $19.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $563M | $11M | $178M | $22.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.09x | -0.97x | -3.01x | 32.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.08x | — | — | 31.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 17.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 0.08x | 0.08x | 1.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.47x | 0.32x | 0.35x | 5.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.82x | — | 113.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BURL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BURL delivers a 29.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-15 for CTRN. CATO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.90x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CTRN's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BURL scores 7/9 vs CATO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.8% | -5.5% | -5.8% | +29.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | -1.9% | -2.2% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.1% | -6.8% | -6.7% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.4% | -6.4% | -9.6% | +12.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.95x | — | 0.90x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $159M | -$24M | $126M | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $24M | $20M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $220M | $0 | $146M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.65x | — | -1.77x | 11.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CTRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BURL five years ago would be worth $9,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,961 for CATO. Over the past 12 months, CTRN leads with a +105.1% total return vs DXLG's -35.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTRN at 44.1% vs DXLG's -47.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | -28.9% | -2.7% | +2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +105.1% | -35.6% | +27.5% | +25.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.5% | -85.6% | -52.4% | +68.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.5% | -55.2% | -60.4% | -7.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +176.4% | -88.1% | -72.3% | +440.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.1% | -47.6% | -21.9% | +18.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CATO and BURL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CATO is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DXLG's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BURL currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs DXLG's 37.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 2.30x | 0.88x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.51 | $1.69 | $4.92 | $351.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.68 | $0.43 | $2.26 | $218.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +37.9% | +59.3% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 58.2 | 48.6 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 144K | 60K | 721K |
Analyst Outlook
BURL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CTRN as "Buy", BURL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.2% upside for CTRN (target: $68) vs 8.2% for BURL (target: $332). CATO is the only dividend payer here at 18.71% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.00 | — | — | $331.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | — | — | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +18.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.55 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +39.2% | +7.4% | +1.4% |
BURL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DXLG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CTRN vs DXLG vs CATO vs BURL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTRN or DXLG or CATO or BURL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (31. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTRN or DXLG or CATO or BURL?
On forward P/E, Burlington Stores, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 31. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTRN or DXLG or CATO or BURL?
Over the past 5 years, Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) delivered a total return of -7. 4%, compared to -60. 4% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BURL returned +440. 2% versus DXLG's -88. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTRN or DXLG or CATO or BURL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
88β versus Destination XL Group, Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning DXLG is approximately 160% more volatile than CATO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Cato Corporation (CATO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 90% versus 195% for Citi Trends, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTRN or DXLG or CATO or BURL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus -8. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Burlington Stores, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1420. 0% for Destination XL Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BURL leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTRN or DXLG or CATO or BURL?
Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 3% net margin versus -8. 3% for Destination XL Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BURL leads at 7. 3% versus -5. 2% for CTRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DXLG leads at 43. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTRN or DXLG or CATO or BURL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) trades at 31. 3x forward P/E versus 44. 1x for Citi Trends, Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CTRN: 44. 2% to $68. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTRN or DXLG or CATO or BURL?
In this comparison, CATO (18.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CTRN, DXLG, BURL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CTRN or DXLG or CATO or BURL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
88), 18. 7% yield). Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CATO: -72. 3%, DXLG: -88. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTRN and DXLG and CATO and BURL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DXLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CATO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BURL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CATO pays a dividend while CTRN, DXLG, BURL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.