Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CUZ vs WELL vs VTR vs HIW vs ARE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CUZ
Cousins Properties Incorporated

REIT - Office

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.40B
5Y Perf.-14.0%
WELL
Welltower Inc.

REIT - Healthcare Facilities

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$150.37B
5Y Perf.+323.6%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.

REIT - Healthcare Facilities

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$41.50B
5Y Perf.+149.7%
HIW
Highwoods Properties, Inc.

REIT - Office

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.80B
5Y Perf.-33.6%
ARE
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.

REIT - Office

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.01B
5Y Perf.-69.9%

CUZ vs WELL vs VTR vs HIW vs ARE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CUZ logoCUZ
WELL logoWELL
VTR logoVTR
HIW logoHIW
ARE logoARE
IndustryREIT - OfficeREIT - Healthcare FacilitiesREIT - Healthcare FacilitiesREIT - OfficeREIT - Office
Market Cap$4.40B$150.37B$41.50B$2.80B$8.01B
Revenue (TTM)$1.01B$11.63B$6.13B$820M$2.90B
Net Income (TTM)$-5M$1.43B$260M$93M$-1.02B
Gross Margin57.6%39.1%-4.3%67.4%68.2%
Operating Margin22.3%4.4%13.4%25.6%-42.8%
Forward P/E93.5x79.6x119.0x39.4x61.0x
Total Debt$3.68B$21.38B$13.22B$3.64B$12.76B
Cash & Equiv.$6M$5.03B$741M$27M$549M

CUZ vs WELL vs VTR vs HIW vs ARELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CUZ
WELL
VTR
HIW
ARE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Cousins Properties … (CUZ)10086.0-14.0%
Welltower Inc. (WELL)100423.6+323.6%
Ventas, Inc. (VTR)100249.7+149.7%
Highwoods Propertie… (HIW)10066.4-33.6%
Alexandria Real Est… (ARE)10030.1-69.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CUZ vs WELL vs VTR vs HIW vs ARE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WELL leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Highwoods Properties, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. ARE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CUZ
Cousins Properties Incorporated
The REIT Holding

CUZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: real estate exposure
WELL
Welltower Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
  • 225.2% 10Y total return vs VTR's 66.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
  • 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs ARE's -2.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
The REIT Holding

Among these 5 stocks, VTR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: real estate exposure
HIW
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

HIW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 0.78, yield 7.7%, current ratio 42.45x
  • Lower P/E (39.4x vs 119.0x)
Best for: defensive
ARE
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

ARE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 11.6%
  • 11.6% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs CUZ's 4.8%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWELL logoWELL35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs ARE's -2.6%
ValueHIW logoHIWLower P/E (39.4x vs 119.0x)
Quality / MarginsWELL logoWELL12.3% margin vs ARE's -35.3%
Stability / SafetyWELL logoWELLBeta 0.15 vs ARE's 0.99, lower leverage
DividendsARE logoARE11.6% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs CUZ's 4.8%
Momentum (1Y)WELL logoWELL+46.7% vs ARE's -31.7%
Efficiency (ROA)WELL logoWELL2.3% ROA vs ARE's -2.9%, ROIC 0.5% vs -2.7%

CUZ vs WELL vs VTR vs HIW vs ARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CUZCousins Properties Incorporated
FY 2025
Rental Properties
77.3%$981M
Variable Rental Revenue
21.7%$275M
Fee And Other Revenue
1.0%$13M
WELLWelltower Inc.
FY 2025
Senior Housing - Operating
81.1%$8.5B
Triple Net
11.4%$1.2B
Outpatient Medical
7.5%$782M
VTRVentas, Inc.
FY 2025
Senior Living Operations
74.0%$4.3B
Outpatient Medical And Research Portfolio
15.5%$898M
Triple Net Leased Properties
10.4%$602M
HIWHighwoods Properties, Inc.
FY 2025
Raleigh, NC
23.9%$181M
Nashville, TN
20.7%$157M
Atlanta, GA
19.1%$145M
Charlotte, NC
12.3%$93M
Tampa, FL
11.6%$88M
Orlando, FL
7.5%$57M
Richmond, VA
4.8%$36M
AREAlexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
FY 2025
Rental revenues
97.3%$2.9B
Product and Service, Other
2.7%$81M

CUZ vs WELL vs VTR vs HIW vs ARE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLARELAGGINGCUZ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ARE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 14.2x HIW's $820M. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARE's -35.3%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCUZ logoCUZCousins Propertie…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.VTR logoVTRVentas, Inc.HIW logoHIWHighwoods Propert…ARE logoAREAlexandria Real E…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.0B$11.6B$6.1B$820M$2.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$646M$2.8B$2.3B$511M$74M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5M$1.4B$260M$93M-$1.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$122M$2.5B$1.4B$318M$1.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+57.6%+39.1%-4.3%+67.4%+68.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.3%+4.4%+13.4%+25.6%-42.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.5%+12.3%+4.2%+11.4%-35.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.2%+21.9%+22.4%+38.7%+48.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.1%+40.3%+22.0%+6.8%-9.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.3%+22.5%0.0%-67.8%+31.9%
ARE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ARE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 17.5x trailing earnings, HIW trades at a 89% valuation discount to VTR's 161.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CUZ's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARE's 136.4x.

MetricCUZ logoCUZCousins Propertie…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.VTR logoVTRVentas, Inc.HIW logoHIWHighwoods Propert…ARE logoAREAlexandria Real E…
Market CapShares × price$4.4B$150.4B$41.5B$2.8B$8.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.1B$166.7B$54.0B$6.4B$20.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS111.50x154.41x161.64x17.53x-5.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.93.53x79.65x119.03x39.36x61.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.65x66.86x24.47x12.71x136.44x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.43x14.10x7.11x3.48x2.70x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.96x3.38x3.21x1.15x0.41x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF32.61x52.80x31.52x16.83x5.66x
ARE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HIW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIW delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-5 for ARE. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIW's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs CUZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCUZ logoCUZCousins Propertie…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.VTR logoVTRVentas, Inc.HIW logoHIWHighwoods Propert…ARE logoAREAlexandria Real E…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-0.1%+3.5%+2.1%+3.8%-5.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.1%+2.3%+1.0%+1.5%-2.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.0%+0.5%+2.5%+2.7%-2.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.8%+0.6%+3.2%+3.5%-3.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947665
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.78x0.49x1.05x1.49x0.67x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.7B$16.3B$12.5B$3.6B$12.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$5.0B$741M$27M$549M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.7B$21.4B$13.2B$3.6B$12.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.26x1.40x2.07x-4.37x
HIW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,610 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,903 for ARE. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +46.7% total return vs ARE's -31.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.9% vs ARE's -20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCUZ logoCUZCousins Propertie…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.VTR logoVTRVentas, Inc.HIW logoHIWHighwoods Propert…ARE logoAREAlexandria Real E…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.7%+15.2%+13.5%+0.2%-4.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+0.8%+46.7%+36.1%-7.0%-31.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.8%+191.6%+95.8%+43.7%-50.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-8.0%+206.1%+75.6%-19.9%-61.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+27.0%+225.2%+66.1%-7.1%-7.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.7%+42.9%+25.1%+12.8%-20.9%
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

VTR is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARE's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs ARE's 52.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCUZ logoCUZCousins Propertie…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.VTR logoVTRVentas, Inc.HIW logoHIWHighwoods Propert…ARE logoAREAlexandria Real E…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.83x0.15x-0.01x0.78x0.99x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$30.81$219.59$88.50$32.76$88.24
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$21.03$142.65$61.76$20.45$39.41
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+86.9%+97.7%+98.6%+77.6%+52.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.354.555.866.651.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M2.6M3.5M1.3M2.5M
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ARE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CUZ as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", HIW as "Hold", ARE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.5% upside for ARE (target: $51) vs 6.2% for HIW (target: $27). For income investors, ARE offers the higher dividend yield at 11.56% vs WELL's 1.29%.

MetricCUZ logoCUZCousins Propertie…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.VTR logoVTRVentas, Inc.HIW logoHIWHighwoods Propert…ARE logoAREAlexandria Real E…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.50$233.25$93.91$27.00$51.11
# AnalystsCovering analysts1634322224
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.8%+1.3%+2.1%+7.7%+11.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises121015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.28$2.76$1.86$1.96$5.35
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.1%+2.6%
ARE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ARE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HIW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallAlexandria Real Estate Equi… (ARE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CUZ vs WELL vs VTR vs HIW vs ARE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CUZ or WELL or VTR or HIW or ARE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 6% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE). Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) offers the better valuation at 17. 5x trailing P/E (39. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CUZ or WELL or VTR or HIW or ARE?

On trailing P/E, Highwoods Properties, Inc.

(HIW) is the cheapest at 17. 5x versus Ventas, Inc. at 161. 6x. On forward P/E, Highwoods Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CUZ or WELL or VTR or HIW or ARE?

Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) delivered a total return of +206. 1%, compared to -61. 0% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +225. 2% versus ARE's -7. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CUZ or WELL or VTR or HIW or ARE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.

(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning ARE is approximately -8706% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 149% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CUZ or WELL or VTR or HIW or ARE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -2. 6% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -568. 9% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CUZ or WELL or VTR or HIW or ARE?

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

(HIW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 8% net margin versus -48. 2% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIW leads at 26. 0% versus -40. 5% for ARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARE leads at 68. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CUZ or WELL or VTR or HIW or ARE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Highwoods Properties, Inc.

(HIW) trades at 39. 4x forward P/E versus 119. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 79. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARE: 10. 5% to $51. 11.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CUZ or WELL or VTR or HIW or ARE?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) offers the highest yield at 11. 6%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).

09

Is CUZ or WELL or VTR or HIW or ARE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.

(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +66. 1%, ARE: -7. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CUZ and WELL and VTR and HIW and ARE?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CUZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HIW is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARE is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CUZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WELL

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VTR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIW

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 40%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CUZ and WELL and VTR and HIW and ARE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CUZ: 5.1% · WELL: 40.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CUZ: 111.5x · WELL: 154.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.