Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CVEO vs MGRC vs WSC vs BBGI vs ABM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Broadcasting
Specialty Business Services
CVEO vs MGRC vs WSC vs BBGI vs ABM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Broadcasting | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $396M | $2.81B | $4.22B | $32M | $2.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $667M | $947M | $2.27B | $206M | $8.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $155M | $-68M | $-197M | $158M |
| Gross Margin | 7.3% | 45.9% | 48.4% | 28.8% | 11.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 25.5% | 20.3% | -2.4% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.7x | 22.1x | — | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $194M | $528M | $4.14B | $271M | $1.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $295K | $15M | $10M | $104M |
CVEO vs MGRC vs WSC vs BBGI vs ABM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civeo Corporation (CVEO) | 100 | 517.0 | +417.0% |
| McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) | 100 | 205.0 | +105.0% |
| WillScot Holdings C… (WSC) | 100 | 174.7 | +74.7% |
| Beasley Broadcast G… (BBGI) | 100 | 36.8 | -63.2% |
| ABM Industries Inco… (ABM) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVEO vs MGRC vs WSC vs BBGI vs ABM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVEO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MGRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 401.5% 10Y total return vs CVEO's 49.0%
- 16.4% margin vs BBGI's -95.4%
- 6.6% ROA vs BBGI's -40.4%, ROIC 10.5% vs -1.2%
Among these 5 stocks, WSC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BBGI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +214.0% vs ABM's -16.0%
ABM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.6%
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 102.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 94.8%, current ratio 1.48x
- PEG 0.04 vs MGRC's 2.00
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% revenue growth vs BBGI's -14.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs BBGI's -95.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs BBGI's 3.23 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs CVEO's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +214.0% vs ABM's -16.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs BBGI's -40.4%, ROIC 10.5% vs -1.2% |
CVEO vs MGRC vs WSC vs BBGI vs ABM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CVEO vs MGRC vs WSC vs BBGI vs ABM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABM leads in 2 of 6 categories
MGRC leads 1 • CVEO leads 1 • WSC leads 0 • BBGI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CVEO and MGRC and WSC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABM is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.9B annually — 43.1x BBGI's $206M. MGRC is the more profitable business, keeping 16.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBGI's -95.4%. On growth, CVEO holds the edge at +19.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $667M | $947M | $2.3B | $206M | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | $350M | $735M | $1M | $431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $155M | -$68M | -$197M | $158M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $196M | $579M | -$6M | $327M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +45.9% | +48.4% | +28.8% | +11.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +25.5% | +20.3% | -2.4% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +16.4% | -3.0% | -95.4% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +20.7% | +25.5% | -3.0% | +3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.9% | +1.6% | -2.0% | -21.2% | +6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -4.3% | -34.8% | -89.1% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ABM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, ABM trades at a 13% valuation discount to MGRC's 18.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ABM offers better value at 0.05x vs MGRC's 2.04x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $396M | $2.8B | $4.2B | $32M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $576M | $3.3B | $8.3B | $292M | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.70x | 18.00x | -80.34x | -0.16x | 15.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.66x | 22.07x | — | 10.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.04x | — | — | 0.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.60x | 9.50x | 9.08x | 198.44x | 9.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.62x | 2.97x | 1.85x | 0.15x | 0.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.27x | 2.28x | 4.96x | — | 1.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 184.54x | 13.29x | 5.72x | — | 15.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGRC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGRC delivers a 12.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-2 for BBGI. MGRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WSC's 4.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGRC scores 6/9 vs BBGI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.7% | +12.8% | -7.1% | -2.1% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | +6.6% | -1.2% | -40.4% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | +10.5% | +7.4% | -1.2% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | +11.3% | +9.2% | -1.3% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.43x | 4.84x | — | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $180M | $528M | $4.1B | $261M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $295,000 | $15M | $10M | $104M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $194M | $528M | $4.1B | $271M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.66x | 8.35x | 0.19x | -0.25x | 3.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVEO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVEO five years ago would be worth $19,447 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,221 for BBGI. Over the past 12 months, BBGI leads with a +214.0% total return vs ABM's -16.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVEO at 18.2% vs WSC's -18.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.8% | +9.6% | +20.0% | +239.0% | -3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.3% | +6.3% | -11.0% | +214.0% | -16.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.2% | +32.7% | -46.6% | -16.9% | +3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.5% | +49.0% | -19.5% | -67.8% | -14.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.0% | +401.5% | +144.8% | -78.6% | +48.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +9.9% | -18.9% | -6.0% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CVEO and ABM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABM is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBGI's 3.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVEO currently trades 90.0% from its 52-week high vs BBGI's 66.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 0.87x | 2.06x | 3.23x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.80 | $128.41 | $31.88 | $26.37 | $52.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.11 | $94.99 | $14.91 | $3.13 | $36.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.0% | +89.0% | +73.1% | +66.2% | +77.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 50.3 | 68.4 | 54.6 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 68K | 213K | 2.2M | 1.5M | 512K |
Analyst Outlook
ABM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CVEO as "Buy", MGRC as "Buy", WSC as "Buy", ABM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.7% upside for ABM (target: $50) vs 1.6% for WSC (target: $24). For income investors, ABM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.57% vs CVEO's 0.87%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $140.00 | $23.67 | — | $50.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 5 | 13 | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +1.7% | +1.2% | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 36 | 1 | 0 | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.27 | $1.94 | $0.28 | — | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +13.5% | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.1% | +5.1% |
ABM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). MGRC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CVEO vs MGRC vs WSC vs BBGI vs ABM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVEO or MGRC or WSC or BBGI or ABM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the stronger pick with 4.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI). ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Civeo Corporation (CVEO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CVEO or MGRC or WSC or BBGI or ABM?
On trailing P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the cheapest at 15.
7x versus McGrath RentCorp at 18. 0x. On forward P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated is actually cheaper at 10. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ABM Industries Incorporated wins at 0. 04x versus McGrath RentCorp's 2. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CVEO or MGRC or WSC or BBGI or ABM?
Over the past 5 years, Civeo Corporation (CVEO) delivered a total return of +94.
5%, compared to -67. 8% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGRC returned +401. 5% versus BBGI's -78. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CVEO or MGRC or WSC or BBGI or ABM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. 's 3. 23β — meaning BBGI is approximately 347% more volatile than ABM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 5% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CVEO or MGRC or WSC or BBGI or ABM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is pulling ahead at 4.
6% versus -14. 3% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ABM Industries Incorporated grew EPS 102. 3% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGRC leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CVEO or MGRC or WSC or BBGI or ABM?
McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
6% net margin versus -95. 4% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGRC leads at 25. 9% versus -2. 4% for BBGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSC leads at 46. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CVEO or MGRC or WSC or BBGI or ABM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus McGrath RentCorp's 2. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 22. 1x for WillScot Holdings Corporation — 11. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABM: 22. 7% to $50. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CVEO or MGRC or WSC or BBGI or ABM?
In this comparison, ABM (2.
6% yield), MGRC (1. 7% yield), WSC (1. 2% yield), CVEO (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. BBGI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CVEO or MGRC or WSC or BBGI or ABM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
87), 1. 7% yield, +401. 5% 10Y return). Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI) carries a higher beta of 3. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGRC: +401. 5%, BBGI: -78. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CVEO and MGRC and WSC and BBGI and ABM?
These companies operate in different sectors (CVEO (Industrials) and MGRC (Industrials) and WSC (Industrials) and BBGI (Communication Services) and ABM (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CVEO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WSC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BBGI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABM is a small-cap deep-value stock. CVEO, MGRC, WSC, ABM pay a dividend while BBGI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.