Food Distribution
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CVGW vs AVO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Distribution
CVGW vs AVO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Distribution | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $495M | $942M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $616M | $1.34B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $33M |
| Gross Margin | 10.2% | 12.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 19.6x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $201M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $65M |
CVGW vs AVO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW) | 100 | 41.3 | -58.7% |
| Mission Produce, In… (AVO) | 100 | 100.8 | +0.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVGW vs AVO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVGW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 2.47x
- Lower P/E (19.6x vs 20.2x)
- 2.9% margin vs AVO's 2.5%
AVO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.32
- Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth 1.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- -3.6% 10Y total return vs CVGW's -36.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.7% revenue growth vs CVGW's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.6x vs 20.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.9% margin vs AVO's 2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs CVGW's 0.44 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.8% vs CVGW's +10.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.8% ROA vs AVO's 3.3%, ROIC 8.6% vs 7.2% |
CVGW vs AVO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CVGW vs AVO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 2.2x CVGW's $616M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.9% (CVGW) to 2.5% (AVO). On growth, AVO holds the edge at -16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $616M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $91M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +12.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.8% | -16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -84.0% | -118.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AVO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.0x trailing earnings, CVGW trades at a 1% valuation discount to AVO's 25.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AVO's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVGW's 16.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $495M | $942M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $457M | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.95x | 25.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.65x | 20.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.88x | 10.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.38x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.53x | 25.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVGW leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVGW delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $5 for AVO. CVGW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVO's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVGW scores 7/9 vs AVO's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.8% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | $136M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $65M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $201M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 42.51x | 10.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVO five years ago would be worth $6,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,967 for CVGW. Over the past 12 months, AVO leads with a +29.8% total return vs CVGW's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVO at 3.7% vs CVGW's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.8% | +14.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.2% | +29.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | +11.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.3% | -33.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.5% | -3.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.4% | +3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CVGW and AVO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVO is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVGW's 0.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVGW currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs AVO's 85.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.98 | $15.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.40 | $10.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 284K | 925K |
Analyst Outlook
AVO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CVGW as "Buy" and AVO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.9% upside for AVO (target: $19) vs -2.5% for CVGW (target: $27). CVGW is the only dividend payer here at 2.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.6% |
AVO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CVGW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CVGW vs AVO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVGW or AVO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mission Produce, Inc.
(AVO) is the stronger pick with 12. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW) offers the better valuation at 25. 0x trailing P/E (19. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CVGW or AVO?
On trailing P/E, Calavo Growers, Inc.
(CVGW) is the cheapest at 25. 0x versus Mission Produce, Inc. at 25. 1x. On forward P/E, Calavo Growers, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CVGW or AVO?
Over the past 5 years, Mission Produce, Inc.
(AVO) delivered a total return of -33. 0%, compared to -60. 3% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVO returned -3. 6% versus CVGW's -36. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CVGW or AVO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mission Produce, Inc.
(AVO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Calavo Growers, Inc. 's 0. 44β — meaning CVGW is approximately 38% more volatile than AVO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 32% for Mission Produce, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CVGW or AVO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mission Produce, Inc.
(AVO) is pulling ahead at 12. 7% versus -2. 0% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calavo Growers, Inc. grew EPS 1950% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for Mission Produce, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVO leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CVGW or AVO?
Calavo Growers, Inc.
(CVGW) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus 2. 7% for Mission Produce, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVO leads at 5. 1% versus 3. 0% for CVGW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVO leads at 11. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CVGW or AVO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Calavo Growers, Inc.
(CVGW) trades at 19. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Mission Produce, Inc. — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVO: 42. 9% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CVGW or AVO?
In this comparison, CVGW (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. AVO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CVGW or AVO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Calavo Growers, Inc.
(CVGW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 44), 2. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CVGW: -36. 5%, AVO: -3. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CVGW and AVO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CVGW pays a dividend while AVO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.