CVNA
Carvana Co.
Auto - Dealerships
Market Cap$84.42B
5Y Perf.+318.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CVNA vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.96T
5Y Perf.+125.1%
CVNA vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CVNA | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $84.42B | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22.52B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.60B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 20.0% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.2% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 50.0x | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $633M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.33B | $86.81B |
CVNA vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CVNA
AMZN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carvana Co. (CVNA) | 100 | 418.8 | +318.8% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVNA vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CVNA and AMZN are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CVNA
Carvana Co.
The Growth Play
CVNA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth 431.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.3%
- 34.1% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.14, Low D/E 15.1%, current ratio 4.31x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Income Pick
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- beta 1.51
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 1.05x
- Lower P/E (35.3x vs 50.0x)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CVNA | 48.6% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% |
| Value | AMZN | Lower P/E (35.3x vs 50.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs CVNA's 7.1% |
| Stability / Safety | AMZN | Beta 1.51 vs CVNA's 2.14 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CVNA | +50.5% vs AMZN's +48.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CVNA | 13.8% ROA vs AMZN's 11.5%, ROIC 34.3% vs 14.7% |
CVNA vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
CVNA vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGCVNA
CVNACarvana Co.
2leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CVNAMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AMZN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
AMZN5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CVNA7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CVNA4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
AMZN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 33.0x CVNA's $22.5B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVNA's 7.1%. On growth, CVNA holds the edge at +52.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CVNACarvana Co. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22.5B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.6B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $740M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.0% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +74.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.3x trailing earnings, AMZN trades at a 17% valuation discount to CVNA's 46.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMZN's 20.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVNA's 38.4x.
| Metric | CVNACarvana Co. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84.4B | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82.7B | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 46.08x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 50.01x | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 38.37x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.15x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.78x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 94.96x | 384.26x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVNA leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVNA delivers a 45.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $23 for AMZN. CVNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x.
| Metric | CVNACarvana Co. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +45.9% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.8% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +34.3% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.0% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.7B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $633M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.68x | 39.96x |
CVNA leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,780 for CVNA. Over the past 12 months, CVNA leads with a +50.5% total return vs AMZN's +48.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVNA at 2.3% vs AMZN's 37.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CVNACarvana Co. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.7% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.5% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3345.8% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.8% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3407.9% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.3% | +37.5% |
CVNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMZN is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVNA's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs CVNA's 80.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CVNACarvana Co. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.14x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $486.89 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $253.49 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.0% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 45.6M |
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CVNA as "Hold" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.3% upside for CVNA (target: $484) vs 11.6% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | CVNACarvana Co. | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $484.00 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CVNA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CVNA vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVNA or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carvana Co.
(CVNA) is the stronger pick with 48. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 38. 3x trailing P/E (35. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CVNA or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 38. 3x versus Carvana Co. at 46. 1x. On forward P/E, Amazon. com, Inc. is actually cheaper at 35. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CVNA or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to +47. 8% for Carvana Co. (CVNA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVNA returned +34. 1% versus AMZN's +715. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CVNA or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Carvana Co. 's 2. 14β — meaning CVNA is approximately 42% more volatile than AMZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Carvana Co. (CVNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CVNA or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carvana Co.
(CVNA) is pulling ahead at 48. 6% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carvana Co. grew EPS 431. 4% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVNA leads at 14. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CVNA or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 6. 9% for Carvana Co. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus 9. 3% for CVNA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CVNA or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) trades at 35. 3x forward P/E versus 50. 0x for Carvana Co. — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVNA: 24. 3% to $484. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CVNA or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CVNA or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 9% 10Y return). Carvana Co. (CVNA) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +715. 9%, CVNA: +34. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CVNA and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CVNA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CVNA: 52.0% · AMZN: 16.6%)Net Margin>
%
(CVNA: 7.1% · AMZN: 12.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CVNA: 46.1x · AMZN: 38.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.