Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CWBC vs PFBC vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
CWBC vs PFBC vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $494M | $1.24B | $2.88B | $949M | $2.85B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $194M | $503M | $644M | $444M | $1.39B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $134M | $209M | $76M | $243M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 72.5% | 55.3% | 79.7% | 57.4% | 52.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 27.1% | 37.7% | 43.7% | 24.3% | 22.4% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 9.6x | 14.7x | 10.0x | 11.4x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $143M | $384M | $991M | $280M | $1.82B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $807M | $108M | $213M | $657M | $343.34B |
CWBC vs PFBC vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community West Banc… (CWBC) | 100 | 305.8 | +205.8% |
| Preferred Bank (PFBC) | 100 | 237.1 | +137.1% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 327.0 | +227.0% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CWBC vs PFBC vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CWBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 344.4%
- NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 18.5% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
- +40.9% vs CVBF's +16.3%
PFBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 149.60x
- PEG 0.55 vs CVBF's 4.64
- Beta 0.55, yield 2.9%, current ratio 149.60x
CVBF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 3.8% yield, vs WAFD's 2.8%
HAFC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 6 stocks, WAFD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs CWBC's 304.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.55 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CWBC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs WAFD's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.9% vs CVBF's +16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CWBC's 0.5% |
CWBC vs PFBC vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CWBC vs PFBC vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFBC leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • CWBC leads 0 • HAFC leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1445.5x CWBC's $194M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAFC's 17.1%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $194M | $503M | $644M | $444M | $1.4B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $56M | $191M | $294M | $110M | $277M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $134M | $209M | $76M | $243M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $44M | $167M | $217M | $204M | $215M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.5% | +55.3% | +79.7% | +57.4% | +52.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | +37.7% | +43.7% | +24.3% | +22.4% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +26.6% | +32.5% | +17.1% | +17.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +33.2% | +33.7% | +45.8% | +15.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.1% | +24.0% | +11.1% | +20.7% | +46.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, PFBC trades at a 39% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFBC offers better value at 0.56x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $494M | $1.2B | $2.9B | $949M | $2.9B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $517M | $814M | $3.8B | $1.0B | $4.0B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.88x | 9.76x | 13.97x | 12.65x | 14.10x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.89x | 9.56x | 14.74x | 10.05x | 11.35x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.99x | 0.56x | 4.40x | 1.00x | 4.58x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.85x | 4.30x | 13.37x | 8.95x | 13.41x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.54x | 2.48x | 4.48x | 2.13x | 2.02x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.65x | 1.26x | 1.20x | 0.98x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.32x | 7.42x | 13.26x | 4.66x | 13.71x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFBC delivers a 17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. CWBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +17.3% | +9.3% | +9.8% | +8.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.8% | +1.4% | +1.0% | +0.9% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +13.5% | +6.8% | +7.4% | +3.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.6% | +4.4% | +9.3% | +2.5% | +5.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.49x | 0.43x | 0.35x | 0.60x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | -$423M | $883M | $68M | $1.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $807M | $108M | $213M | $657M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $143M | $384M | $991M | $280M | $1.8B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.06x | 0.88x | 2.12x | 0.62x | 0.48x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,522 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, CWBC leads with a +40.9% total return vs CVBF's +16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs WAFD's 11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.9% | +7.6% | +14.8% | +20.3% | +17.1% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.9% | +24.3% | +16.3% | +39.4% | +32.5% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.6% | +104.2% | +64.4% | +116.0% | +37.6% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.4% | +71.1% | +15.2% | +80.5% | +29.5% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +304.9% | +275.3% | +66.9% | +73.3% | +91.9% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.5% | +26.9% | +18.0% | +29.3% | +11.2% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFBC and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.55x | 0.81x | 0.82x | 0.66x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.80 | $103.05 | $21.48 | $31.87 | $37.10 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.98 | $79.60 | $17.95 | $22.00 | $26.31 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +98.6% | +98.8% | +99.6% | +99.9% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.1 | 69.8 | 60.1 | 62.5 | 63.8 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 254K | 93K | 1.6M | 203K | 525K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CWBC as "Buy", PFBC as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold", HAFC as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -5.6% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.75 | $102.00 | $24.75 | $33.50 | $35.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 10 | 16 | 11 | 11 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +2.9% | +3.8% | +3.4% | +2.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | $2.98 | $0.82 | $1.09 | $1.05 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +7.5% | +2.8% | +1.0% | +3.6% | +3.9% |
PFBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CWBC vs PFBC vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CWBC or PFBC or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). Preferred Bank (PFBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Community West Bancshares (CWBC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CWBC or PFBC or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the cheapest at 9.
8x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Preferred Bank is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Preferred Bank wins at 0. 55x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CWBC or PFBC or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +15. 2% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CVBF's +66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CWBC or PFBC or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 72% more volatile than PFBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CWBC or PFBC or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Community West Bancshares grew EPS 344. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CWBC or PFBC or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD or JPM?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CWBC or PFBC or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Preferred Bank (PFBC) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for CVB Financial Corp. — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — CWBC or PFBC or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is CWBC or PFBC or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 2. 9% yield, +275. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFBC: +275. 3%, HAFC: +73. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CWBC and PFBC and CVBF and HAFC and WAFD and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CWBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.