CWCO vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs AWR

For growth investors, American States Water Company (AWR) is the stronger pick with 10.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the cheapest at 14.

3x versus American States Water Company at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American States Water Company wins at 2. 70x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x.

Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Water Co.

Ltd. (CWCO) delivered a total return of +197. 4%, compared to -32. 0% for The York Water Company (YORW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWCO returned +155. 1% versus YORW's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American States Water Company (AWR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

17β versus Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. 's 0. 76β — meaning CWCO is approximately -542% more volatile than AWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 97% for The York Water Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), American States Water Company (AWR) is pulling ahead at 10.

5% versus -1. 4% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Artesian Resources Corporation grew EPS 11. 6% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWCO leads at 12. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The York Water Company (YORW) is the more profitable company, earning 25.

9% net margin versus 13. 9% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus 27. 9% for MSEX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YORW leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, American States Water Company (AWR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 70x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) trades at 15. 8x forward P/E versus 31. 6x for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AWR: 16. 5% to $89. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 5% for American States Water Company (AWR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, American States Water Company (AWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

17), 2. 5% yield, +123. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWR: +123. 2%, CWCO: +155. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; YORW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARTNA is a small-cap deep-value stock; AWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.