Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN vs NKTR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CWD
CaliberCos Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-98.1%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.50B
5Y Perf.+20.7%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$40.44B
5Y Perf.+41.4%
AGEN
Agenus Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$132M
5Y Perf.-87.5%
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.69B
5Y Perf.+877.5%

CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN vs NKTR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CWD logoCWD
RCUS logoRCUS
ARES logoARES
AGEN logoAGEN
NKTR logoNKTR
IndustryAsset ManagementBiotechnologyAsset ManagementBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$21M$2.50B$40.44B$132M$1.69B
Revenue (TTM)$51M$236M$6.47B$114M$55M
Net Income (TTM)$-21M$-369M$527M$115K$-164M
Gross Margin48.2%90.7%74.8%35.7%99.6%
Operating Margin-26.0%-168.6%27.2%-17.7%-237.9%
Forward P/E20.2x1.8x
Total Debt$82M$99M$14.91B$10M$149M
Cash & Equiv.$2M$222M$1.50B$3M$15M

CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN vs NKTRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CWD
RCUS
ARES
AGEN
NKTR
StockMay 23May 26Return
CaliberCos Inc. (CWD)1001.9-98.1%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)100120.7+20.7%
Ares Management Cor… (ARES)100141.4+41.4%
Agenus Inc. (AGEN)10012.5-87.5%
Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR)100977.5+877.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN vs NKTR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ARES leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Agenus Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. NKTR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CWD
CaliberCos Inc.
The Financial Play

CWD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, RCUS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
The Banking Pick

ARES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.62, yield 6.6%
  • 9.3% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 45.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.62, current ratio 2.24x
  • Beta 1.62, yield 6.6%, current ratio 2.24x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
AGEN
Agenus Inc.
The Growth Play

AGEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics
The Momentum Pick

NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +8.2% vs CWD's -79.8%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARES logoARES66.6% NII/revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
ValueAGEN logoAGENBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsARES logoARES8.2% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
Stability / SafetyARES logoARESBeta 1.62 vs AGEN's 2.72
DividendsARES logoARES6.6% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NKTR logoNKTR+8.2% vs CWD's -79.8%
Efficiency (ROA)ARES logoARES1.9% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 6.1% vs -57.2%

CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN vs NKTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CWDCaliberCos Inc.
FY 2024
Hotel
51.8%$26M
Asset Management
33.0%$17M
Product and Service, Other
14.5%$7M
Investment Performance
0.7%$358,000
RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
ARESAres Management Corporation
FY 2025
Management Service
64.4%$3.7B
Carried Interest
20.5%$1.2B
Administrative Service
6.3%$366M
Management Service, Incentive
6.3%$365M
Principal Investment Income (Loss)
2.4%$139M
AGENAgenus Inc.
FY 2025
Non Cash Royalty Revenue
99.1%$109M
Other
0.9%$1M
NKTRNektar Therapeutics
FY 2025
Non Cash Royalty Revenue Related To Sale Of Future Royalties
99.5%$55M
License Collaboration And Other Revenue
0.5%$300,000

CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN vs NKTR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLARESLAGGINGAGEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ARES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ARES is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.5B annually — 126.6x CWD's $51M. ARES is the more profitable business, keeping 8.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCWD logoCWDCaliberCos Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ARES logoARESAres Management C…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$51M$236M$6.5B$114M$55M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M-$391M$1.8B-$10M-$130M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$21M-$369M$527M$115,000-$164M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$489M$1.5B-$159M-$209M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.2%+90.7%+74.8%+35.7%+99.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-26.0%-168.6%+27.2%-17.7%-2.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-38.7%-156.4%+8.2%+0.1%-3.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.1%-2.1%+23.9%-139.1%-3.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-39.3%+27.5%-25.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.5%-80.9%+85.3%-4.5%
ARES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CWD and AGEN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricCWD logoCWDCaliberCos Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ARES logoARESAres Management C…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$21M$2.5B$40.4B$132M$1.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$101M$2.4B$53.9B$140M$1.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.07x-7.54x62.83x-1102.94x-8.57x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.23x1.79x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.56x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.41x10.11x6.25x1.16x30.64x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.88x4.22x3.08x15.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF38.04x26.19x
Evenly matched — CWD and AGEN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ARES leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ARES delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. RCUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWD's 7.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARES scores 8/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCWD logoCWDCaliberCos Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ARES logoARESAres Management C…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.3%-69.0%+6.2%-4.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-25.3%-35.3%+1.9%+0.1%-62.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.4%-64.1%+6.1%-57.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.2%-42.1%+7.3%-55.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–940862
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage7.27x0.16x1.71x1.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$79M-$123M$13.4B$7M$134M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$222M$1.5B$3M$15M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$82M$99M$14.9B$10M$149M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.64x-13.38x2.68x1.11x-4.74x
ARES leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ARES five years ago would be worth $26,021 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $62 for CWD. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs CWD's -79.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs CWD's -81.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCWD logoCWDCaliberCos Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ARES logoARESAres Management C…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-30.9%+6.5%-25.1%+16.1%+92.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-79.8%+209.6%-21.1%+27.1%+818.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.4%+24.9%+64.7%-88.2%+621.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.4%-18.6%+160.2%-93.9%-72.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.4%+45.9%+929.6%-94.3%-59.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-81.6%+7.7%+18.1%-51.0%+93.3%
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — RCUS and ARES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ARES is the less volatile stock with a 1.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCUS currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs CWD's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCWD logoCWDCaliberCos Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ARES logoARESAres Management C…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.00x1.95x1.62x2.72x1.85x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$48.00$28.72$195.26$7.34$109.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.87$7.06$95.80$2.71$7.99
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.0%+86.3%+63.1%+51.1%+76.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.060.563.248.853.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded153K1.2M3.7M814K991K
Evenly matched — RCUS and ARES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ARES leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: RCUS as "Buy", ARES as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.5% upside for AGEN (target: $7) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30). ARES is the only dividend payer here at 6.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCWD logoCWDCaliberCos Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ARES logoARESAres Management C…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$30.00$177.38$7.33$132.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts18221133
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises071
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$8.08
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.1%0.0%
ARES leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ARES leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallAres Management Corporation (ARES)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN vs NKTR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN or NKTR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is the stronger pick with 66.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Ares Management Corporation (ARES) offers the better valuation at 62. 8x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN or NKTR?

On forward P/E, Agenus Inc.

is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN or NKTR?

Over the past 5 years, Ares Management Corporation (ARES) delivered a total return of +160.

2%, compared to -99. 4% for CaliberCos Inc. (CWD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARES returned +929. 6% versus CWD's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN or NKTR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

62β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 68% more volatile than ARES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 7% for CaliberCos Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN or NKTR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is pulling ahead at 66.

6% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -42. 9% for CaliberCos Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN or NKTR?

Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is the more profitable company, earning 8.

2% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 8. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARES leads at 27. 2% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN or NKTR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.

(AGEN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Ares Management Corporation — 18. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGEN: 95. 5% to $7. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN or NKTR?

In this comparison, ARES (6.

6% yield) pays a dividend. CWD, RCUS, AGEN, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN or NKTR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (6.

6% yield, +929. 6% 10Y return). CaliberCos Inc. (CWD) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARES: +929. 6%, CWD: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CWD and RCUS and ARES and AGEN and NKTR?

These companies operate in different sectors (CWD (Financial Services) and RCUS (Healthcare) and ARES (Financial Services) and AGEN (Healthcare) and NKTR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CWD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARES is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ARES pays a dividend while CWD, RCUS, AGEN, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CWD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARES

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 33%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AGEN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NKTR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CWD and RCUS and ARES and AGEN and NKTR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CWD: -43.8% · RCUS: -39.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.