CWK
Cushman & Wakefield plc
Real Estate - Services
Market Cap$3.40B
5Y Perf.+41.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CWK vs WELL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WELL
Welltower Inc.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Market Cap$150.14B
5Y Perf.+322.9%
CWK vs WELL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CWK | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $3.40B | $150.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.29B | $11.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $88M | $1.43B |
| Gross Margin | 17.3% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 78.9x |
| Total Debt | $3.24B | $21.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $784M | $5.03B |
CWK vs WELL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CWK
WELL
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cushman & Wakefield… (CWK) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 422.9 | +322.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CWK vs WELL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WELL leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Cushman & Wakefield plc is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CWK
Cushman & Wakefield plc
The Real Estate Income Play
CWK is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 78.9x)
- +45.2% vs WELL's +43.9%
Best for: value and momentum
WELL
Welltower Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 230.2% 10Y total return vs CWK's -18.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WELL | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs CWK's 8.9% |
| Value | CWK | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 78.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | WELL | 12.3% margin vs CWK's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | WELL | Beta 0.13 vs CWK's 1.90, lower leverage |
| Dividends | WELL | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CWK | +45.2% vs WELL's +43.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WELL | 2.3% ROA vs CWK's 1.2%, ROIC 0.5% vs 7.9% |
CWK vs WELL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
CWK vs WELL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWELLLAGGINGCWK
CWKCushman & Wakefield p…
2leads
WELLWelltower Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CWKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WELL6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CWK6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CWK6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WELL5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
WELL2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL and CWK operate at a comparable scale, with $11.6B and $10.3B in trailing revenue. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CWK's 0.9%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CWKCushman & Wakefie… | WELLWelltower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.3B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $556M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $88M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $307M | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +39.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.8% | +40.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -120.5% | +22.5% |
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CWK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.2x trailing earnings, CWK trades at a 75% valuation discount to WELL's 154.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CWK's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.8x.
| Metric | CWKCushman & Wakefie… | WELLWelltower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $150.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.9B | $166.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.24x | 154.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.06x | 78.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.42x | 66.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 14.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.74x | 3.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.62x | 52.72x |
CWK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CWK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CWK delivers a 4.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $3 for WELL. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWK's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs CWK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CWKCushman & Wakefie… | WELLWelltower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.6% | +3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $16.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $784M | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.2B | $21.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.53x | 0.26x |
CWK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,289 for CWK. Over the past 12 months, CWK leads with a +45.2% total return vs WELL's +43.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 41.3% vs CWK's 22.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CWKCushman & Wakefie… | WELLWelltower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.3% | +15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.2% | +43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.1% | +182.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.1% | +212.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.4% | +230.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.1% | +41.3% |
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CWK's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs CWK's 83.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CWKCushman & Wakefie… | WELLWelltower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.90x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.40 | $219.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.43 | $142.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 62.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 2.6M |
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CWK as "Hold" and WELL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.4% upside for CWK (target: $19) vs 5.7% for WELL (target: $227). WELL is the only dividend payer here at 1.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CWKCushman & Wakefie… | WELLWelltower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.80 | $226.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
WELL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CWK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallWelltower Inc. (WELL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CWK vs WELL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CWK or WELL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 9% for Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK). Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) offers the better valuation at 38. 2x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CWK or WELL?
On trailing P/E, Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) is the cheapest at 38.
2x versus Welltower Inc. at 154. 2x. On forward P/E, Cushman & Wakefield plc is actually cheaper at 10. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CWK or WELL?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +212. 6%, compared to -17. 1% for Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +230. 2% versus CWK's -18. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CWK or WELL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Cushman & Wakefield plc's 1. 90β — meaning CWK is approximately 1333% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 166% for Cushman & Wakefield plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CWK or WELL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 8. 9% for Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Welltower Inc. grew EPS -11. 5% year-over-year, compared to -32. 1% for Cushman & Wakefield plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CWK or WELL?
Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus 0. 9% for Cushman & Wakefield plc — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWK leads at 4. 5% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WELL leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CWK or WELL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) trades at 10.
1x forward P/E versus 78. 9x for Welltower Inc. — 68. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CWK: 29. 4% to $18. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — CWK or WELL?
In this comparison, WELL (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CWK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CWK or WELL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +230. 2% 10Y return). Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +230. 2%, CWK: -18. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CWK and WELL?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CWK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WELL pays a dividend while CWK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CWK: 10.8% · WELL: 40.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CWK: 38.2x · WELL: 154.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.