Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET vs PRTH vs FROG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Staffing & Employment Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET vs PRTH vs FROG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Staffing & Employment Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $3M | $1.33B | $1.98B | $451M | $6.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $32M | $4.94B | $953M | $563M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-157M | $159M | $56M | $-62M |
| Gross Margin | 83.5% | 15.4% | 17.7% | 21.4% | 77.4% |
| Operating Margin | -351.0% | -5.6% | 5.5% | 14.8% | -14.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 10.1x | 5.8x | 63.4x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $21M | $979M | $1.05B | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $106M | $1.98B | $77M | $77M |
CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET vs PRTH vs FROG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CXApp Inc. (CXAI) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| Enovix Corporation (ENVX) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
| TriNet Group, Inc. (TNET) | 100 | 53.4 | -46.6% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 60.7 | -39.3% |
| JFrog Ltd. (FROG) | 100 | 106.6 | +6.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET vs PRTH vs FROG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, CXAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ENVX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 37.9%, EPS growth 40.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 37.9% revenue growth vs CXAI's -3.0%
TNET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.83, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.09x
- Beta 0.83 vs ENVX's 3.40
- 2.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 4.4% ROA vs CXAI's -41.7%
PRTH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.12
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 63.4x)
- 5.8% margin vs ENVX's -492.6%
FROG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -12.0% 10Y total return vs TNET's 147.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 2.2%, current ratio 2.09x
- +65.0% vs CXAI's -85.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.9% revenue growth vs CXAI's -3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 63.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.8% margin vs ENVX's -492.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs ENVX's 3.40 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.0% vs CXAI's -85.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs CXAI's -41.7% |
CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET vs PRTH vs FROG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET vs PRTH vs FROG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRTH leads in 2 of 6 categories
TNET leads 1 • FROG leads 1 • CXAI leads 0 • ENVX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNET is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 1203.5x CXAI's $4M. PRTH is the more profitable business, keeping 5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENVX's -4.9%. On growth, FROG holds the edge at +25.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $32M | $4.9B | $953M | $563M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$142M | $372M | $204M | -$66M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$157M | $159M | $56M | -$62M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$114M | $330M | $75M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.5% | +15.4% | +17.7% | +21.4% | +77.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | -5.6% | +5.5% | +14.8% | -14.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -4.9% | +3.2% | +5.8% | -10.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -3.6% | +6.7% | +7.9% | +26.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +15.9% | -5.1% | +8.8% | +25.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.1% | +20.0% | +10.5% | +3.1% | +56.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TNET and PRTH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 40% valuation discount to TNET's 13.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TNET's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRTH's 6.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $1.3B | $2.0B | $451M | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $1.2B | $976M | $1.4B | $6.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.13x | -8.56x | 13.57x | 8.10x | -91.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 10.07x | 5.78x | 63.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 2.77x | 6.95x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 41.89x | 0.39x | 0.47x | 12.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | 4.86x | 38.12x | — | 7.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 6.46x | 6.01x | 48.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNET leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNET delivers a 179.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $180 in annual profit, vs $-78 for CXAI. FROG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNET's 18.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TNET scores 6/9 vs CXAI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.0% | -0.1% | +179.7% | — | -7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.7% | -0.0% | +4.4% | +2.6% | -4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -52.9% | -74.2% | — | +13.4% | -8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -59.1% | -27.5% | +23.2% | +16.0% | -9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.08x | 18.13x | — | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $708,000 | -$85M | -$1.0B | $969M | -$57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $106M | $2.0B | $77M | $77M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $21M | $979M | $1.0B | $19M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.39x | -7.03x | 5.20x | 1.51x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FROG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FROG five years ago would be worth $15,879 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $156 for CXAI. Over the past 12 months, FROG leads with a +65.0% total return vs CXAI's -85.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FROG at 38.5% vs CXAI's -74.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.0% | -18.6% | -24.0% | +3.6% | -4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -85.3% | +3.9% | -45.7% | -10.4% | +65.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -51.8% | -50.1% | +50.5% | +165.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -51.4% | -44.6% | -15.9% | +58.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -48.8% | +147.4% | -43.8% | -12.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.7% | -21.6% | -20.7% | +14.6% | +38.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TNET and FROG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNET is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVX's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FROG currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs CXAI's 10.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.90x | 3.40x | 0.83x | 2.12x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.45 | $16.49 | $86.78 | $8.89 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $4.62 | $33.60 | $4.44 | $33.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.6% | +38.9% | +49.4% | +62.0% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.2 | 57.9 | 51.3 | 53.4 | 67.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.3M | 5.7M | 433K | 252K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
PRTH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ENVX as "Buy", TNET as "Hold", PRTH as "Buy", FROG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 176.5% upside for ENVX (target: $18) vs 20.5% for FROG (target: $69). TNET is the only dividend payer here at 2.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.75 | $68.50 | $11.00 | $68.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 14 | 5 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.08 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.4% | +9.3% | +2.3% | 0.0% |
PRTH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). TNET leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET vs PRTH vs FROG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CXAI or ENVX or TNET or PRTH or FROG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Enovix Corporation (ENVX) is the stronger pick with 37.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 0% for CXApp Inc. (CXAI). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enovix Corporation (ENVX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CXAI or ENVX or TNET or PRTH or FROG?
On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus TriNet Group, Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CXAI or ENVX or TNET or PRTH or FROG?
Over the past 5 years, JFrog Ltd.
(FROG) delivered a total return of +58. 8%, compared to -98. 4% for CXApp Inc. (CXAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TNET returned +147. 4% versus CXAI's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CXAI or ENVX or TNET or PRTH or FROG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriNet Group, Inc.
(TNET) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Enovix Corporation's 3. 40β — meaning ENVX is approximately 309% more volatile than TNET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JFrog Ltd. (FROG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 18% for TriNet Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CXAI or ENVX or TNET or PRTH or FROG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enovix Corporation (ENVX) is pulling ahead at 37.
9% versus -3. 0% for CXApp Inc. (CXAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 319. 4% year-over-year, compared to -7. 9% for TriNet Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENVX leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CXAI or ENVX or TNET or PRTH or FROG?
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -492. 6% for Enovix Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRTH leads at 14. 8% versus -557. 0% for ENVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CXAI leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CXAI or ENVX or TNET or PRTH or FROG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 63. 4x for JFrog Ltd. — 57. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENVX: 176. 5% to $17. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — CXAI or ENVX or TNET or PRTH or FROG?
In this comparison, TNET (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. CXAI, ENVX, PRTH, FROG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CXAI or ENVX or TNET or PRTH or FROG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriNet Group, Inc.
(TNET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 2. 5% yield, +147. 4% 10Y return). CXApp Inc. (CXAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TNET: +147. 4%, CXAI: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CXAI and ENVX and TNET and PRTH and FROG?
These companies operate in different sectors (CXAI (Technology) and ENVX (Industrials) and TNET (Industrials) and PRTH (Technology) and FROG (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CXAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENVX is a small-cap high-growth stock; TNET is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FROG is a small-cap high-growth stock. TNET pays a dividend while CXAI, ENVX, PRTH, FROG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.