CYD vs ALSN

For growth investors, China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) is the stronger pick with 6.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (13. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

(ALSN) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus China Yuchai International Limited at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, China Yuchai International Limited is actually cheaper at 2. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) delivered a total return of +198.

0%, compared to +183. 5% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CYD returned +427. 4% versus ALSN's +373. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

(ALSN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus China Yuchai International Limited's 1. 21β — meaning CYD is approximately 10% more volatile than ALSN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 156% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) is pulling ahead at 6.

0% versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Yuchai International Limited grew EPS 17. 5% year-over-year, compared to -11. 8% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALSN leads at 2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

(ALSN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 1. 7% for China Yuchai International Limited — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALSN leads at 32. 3% versus 3. 1% for CYD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALSN leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) trades at 2.

2x forward P/E versus 13. 6x for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — 11. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CYD: 37. 0% to $60. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) offers the highest yield at 0. 9%, versus 0. 9% for China Yuchai International Limited (CYD).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

(ALSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 0. 9% yield, +373. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALSN: +373. 8%, CYD: +427. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (CYD (Industrials) and ALSN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CYD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALSN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.