Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DAKT vs LYTS vs OESX vs ON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
DAKT vs LYTS vs OESX vs ON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $975M | $760M | $33M | $39.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $803M | $592M | $81M | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $26M | $-5M | $574M |
| Gross Margin | 26.6% | 25.3% | 29.9% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 6.5% | -4.3% | 10.8% |
| Forward P/E | 21.5x | 22.3x | — | 34.4x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $67M | $10M | $3.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $3M | $6M | $2.15B |
DAKT vs LYTS vs OESX vs ON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) | 100 | 471.9 | +371.9% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 397.7 | +297.7% |
| Orion Energy System… (OESX) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| ON Semiconductor Co… (ON) | 100 | 610.0 | +510.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAKT vs LYTS vs OESX vs ON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DAKT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 6.2%, current ratio 2.22x
- Lower P/E (21.5x vs 34.4x)
LYTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.43, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 22.1% revenue growth vs ON's -15.3%
- 0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
OESX is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.10 vs ON's 1.95
ON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs DAKT's 156.0%
- 9.5% margin vs OESX's -5.6%
- +159.2% vs OESX's +31.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs ON's -15.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.5x vs 34.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.5% margin vs OESX's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs ON's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +159.2% vs OESX's +31.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs OESX's -0.0%, ROIC 9.5% vs -34.8% |
DAKT vs LYTS vs OESX vs ON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DAKT vs LYTS vs OESX vs ON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ON leads in 2 of 6 categories
DAKT leads 1 • LYTS leads 1 • OESX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ON is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 74.4x OESX's $81M. ON is the more profitable business, keeping 9.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OESX's -5.6%. On growth, DAKT holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $803M | $592M | $81M | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $65M | $51M | -$1M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $26M | -$5M | $574M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $62M | $38M | $348M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +25.3% | +29.9% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +6.5% | -4.3% | +10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +4.3% | -5.6% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +6.4% | +4.3% | +24.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | -0.5% | +7.7% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +117.0% | +11.1% | +109.6% | +93.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DAKT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, LYTS trades at a 91% valuation discount to ON's 346.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DAKT's 16.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ON's 28.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $975M | $760M | $33M | $39.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $865M | $823M | $37M | $40.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -95.29x | 30.91x | -2.57x | 346.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.52x | 22.34x | — | 34.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.82x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.42x | 17.03x | — | 28.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 1.33x | 0.41x | 6.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.50x | 3.26x | 2.56x | 5.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.47x | 21.94x | 66.51x | 27.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DAKT and LYTS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYTS delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-0 for OESX. DAKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OESX's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LYTS scores 5/9 vs ON's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +10.9% | -0.0% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | +6.5% | -0.0% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.2% | +9.5% | -34.8% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +12.6% | -34.9% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.29x | 0.87x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$111M | $63M | $4M | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $3M | $6M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $67M | $10M | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 37.31x | 13.52x | -3.29x | 10.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYTS five years ago would be worth $32,341 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,637 for OESX. Over the past 12 months, ON leads with a +159.2% total return vs OESX's +31.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAKT at 57.8% vs OESX's -15.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.9% | +32.8% | -38.0% | +77.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +58.0% | +31.2% | +159.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +293.1% | +100.0% | -38.7% | +24.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +208.3% | +223.4% | -83.6% | +160.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.0% | +108.5% | -32.5% | +1004.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.8% | +26.0% | -15.1% | +7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYTS and OESX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OESX is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ON's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs OESX's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.43x | 1.10x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.27 | $24.75 | $18.64 | $105.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.05 | $15.31 | $5.50 | $37.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.8% | +98.7% | +49.6% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 70.1 | 41.8 | 81.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 449K | 378K | 39K | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
LYTS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DAKT as "Buy", LYTS as "Buy", ON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.6% upside for LYTS (target: $27) vs -38.0% for ON (target: $62). LYTS is the only dividend payer here at 0.79% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | — | $62.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 5 | — | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.19 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +3.5% |
ON leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). DAKT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
DAKT vs LYTS vs OESX vs ON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAKT or LYTS or OESX or ON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (22. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAKT or LYTS or OESX or ON?
On trailing P/E, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the cheapest at 30. 9x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 346. 8x. On forward P/E, Daktronics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAKT or LYTS or OESX or ON?
Over the past 5 years, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) delivered a total return of +223. 4%, compared to -83. 6% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ON returned +1004% versus OESX's -32. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAKT or LYTS or OESX or ON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus ON Semiconductor Corporation's 1. 95β — meaning ON is approximately 78% more volatile than OESX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 87% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DAKT or LYTS or OESX or ON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Orion Energy Systems, Inc. grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -128. 4% for Daktronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAKT or LYTS or OESX or ON?
LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 3% net margin versus -14. 8% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ON leads at 12. 5% versus -13. 3% for OESX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ON leads at 32. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DAKT or LYTS or OESX or ON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Daktronics, Inc.
(DAKT) trades at 21. 5x forward P/E versus 34. 4x for ON Semiconductor Corporation — 12. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LYTS: 10. 6% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DAKT or LYTS or OESX or ON?
In this comparison, LYTS (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. DAKT, OESX, ON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DAKT or LYTS or OESX or ON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +108. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYTS: +108. 5%, DAKT: +156. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DAKT and LYTS and OESX and ON?
These companies operate in different sectors (DAKT (Technology) and LYTS (Technology) and OESX (Industrials) and ON (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DAKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; OESX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LYTS pays a dividend while DAKT, OESX, ON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.