Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DAKT vs OLED vs VUZI vs MVIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Consumer Electronics
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
DAKT vs OLED vs VUZI vs MVIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Consumer Electronics | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $975M | $4.37B | $232M | $189M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $803M | $627M | $5M | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $214M | $-32.28B | $-95M |
| Gross Margin | 26.6% | 73.5% | -0.0% | -14.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 35.6% | -5.2% | -57.4% |
| Forward P/E | 21.5x | 19.4x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $17M | $43M | $1.00B | $37M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $138M | $21.15B | $32M |
DAKT vs OLED vs VUZI vs MVIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) | 100 | 471.9 | +371.9% |
| Universal Display C… (OLED) | 100 | 63.3 | -36.7% |
| Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) | 100 | 114.9 | +14.9% |
| MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) | 100 | 70.0 | -30.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAKT vs OLED vs VUZI vs MVIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DAKT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 156.0% 10Y total return vs OLED's 86.6%
OLED carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.39, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.06x
- Beta 1.39, yield 1.9%, current ratio 10.06x
- Better valuation composite
VUZI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.1K%, EPS growth 61.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3%
- +63.4% vs MVIS's -45.5%
MVIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.1% margin vs MVIS's -78.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs VUZI's 3.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs VUZI's 10.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.4% vs MVIS's -45.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.0% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC 11.7% vs -10.7% |
DAKT vs OLED vs VUZI vs MVIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DAKT vs OLED vs VUZI vs MVIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OLED leads in 2 of 6 categories
DAKT leads 1 • VUZI leads 0 • MVIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $803M annually — 664.4x MVIS's $1M. OLED is the more profitable business, keeping 34.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVIS's -78.6%. On growth, VUZI holds the edge at +4933.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $803M | $627M | $5M | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $65M | $259M | -$30.9B | -$64M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $214M | -$32.3B | -$95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $62M | $237M | -$20.8B | -$59M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +73.5% | -0.0% | -14.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +35.6% | -5.2% | -57.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +34.1% | -5.1% | -78.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +37.8% | -3.3% | -49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | -14.5% | +4933.1% | -86.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +117.0% | -43.7% | +25.0% | +14.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DAKT and OLED and VUZI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OLED's 14.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DAKT's 16.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $975M | $4.4B | $232M | $189M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $865M | $4.3B | -$19.9B | $193M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -95.29x | 18.26x | -6.81x | -1.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.52x | 19.43x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.44x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.42x | 14.37x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 6.71x | 0.04x | 156.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.50x | 2.51x | 0.01x | 3.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.47x | 28.30x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OLED leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OLED delivers a 12.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VUZI. OLED carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MVIS's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DAKT scores 4/9 vs VUZI's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +12.3% | -5.2% | -137.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | +11.0% | -3.2% | -74.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.2% | +11.7% | -10.7% | -98.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +14.0% | -184.6% | -93.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.02x | 0.04x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$111M | -$95M | -$20.1B | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $138M | $21.2B | $32M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $43M | $1.0B | $37M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 37.31x | — | — | -3.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAKT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DAKT five years ago would be worth $30,832 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $437 for MVIS. Over the past 12 months, VUZI leads with a +63.4% total return vs MVIS's -45.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAKT at 57.8% vs MVIS's -35.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.9% | -23.5% | -25.7% | -30.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | -34.0% | +63.4% | -45.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +293.1% | -29.9% | -29.6% | -73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +208.3% | -54.9% | -84.8% | -95.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.0% | +86.6% | -35.7% | -66.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.8% | -11.1% | -11.0% | -35.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DAKT and OLED each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OLED is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VUZI's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAKT currently trades 70.8% from its 52-week high vs MVIS's 35.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.39x | 3.40x | 2.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.27 | $163.21 | $4.29 | $1.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.05 | $83.64 | $1.71 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.8% | +56.8% | +66.7% | +35.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 46.7 | 61.1 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 449K | 817K | 924K | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OLED and VUZI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DAKT as "Buy", OLED as "Buy", VUZI as "Buy", MVIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 711.7% upside for MVIS (target: $5) vs 52.0% for OLED (target: $141). For income investors, VUZI offers the higher dividend yield at 10.10% vs OLED's 1.94%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $141.00 | $6.00 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 19 | 5 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% | +10.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 9 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.80 | $0.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OLED leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DAKT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
DAKT vs OLED vs VUZI vs MVIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAKT or OLED or VUZI or MVIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is the stronger pick with 1090% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Universal Display Corporation (OLED) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAKT or OLED or VUZI or MVIS?
On forward P/E, Universal Display Corporation is actually cheaper at 19.
4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAKT or OLED or VUZI or MVIS?
Over the past 5 years, Daktronics, Inc.
(DAKT) delivered a total return of +208. 3%, compared to -95. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DAKT returned +156. 0% versus MVIS's -66. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAKT or OLED or VUZI or MVIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
39β versus Vuzix Corporation's 3. 40β — meaning VUZI is approximately 145% more volatile than OLED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 66% for MicroVision, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DAKT or OLED or VUZI or MVIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is pulling ahead at 1090% versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vuzix Corporation grew EPS 61. 1% year-over-year, compared to -128. 4% for Daktronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VUZI leads at 709. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAKT or OLED or VUZI or MVIS?
Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
2% net margin versus -78. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLED leads at 38. 5% versus -57. 4% for MVIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OLED leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DAKT or OLED or VUZI or MVIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) trades at 19.
4x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for Daktronics, Inc. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVIS: 711. 7% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DAKT or OLED or VUZI or MVIS?
In this comparison, VUZI (10.
1% yield), OLED (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DAKT, MVIS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DAKT or OLED or VUZI or MVIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
9% yield). MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLED: +86. 6%, MVIS: -66. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DAKT and OLED and VUZI and MVIS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DAKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OLED is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VUZI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MVIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. OLED, VUZI pay a dividend while DAKT, MVIS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.