Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DAO vs CHGG vs PRDO vs STRA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
DAO vs CHGG vs PRDO vs STRA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $375M | $143M | $2.16B | $1.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.89B | $319M | $855M | $1.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $107M | $-86M | $170M | $130M |
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | 61.9% | 51.8% | 37.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | -11.1% | 24.3% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.3x | — | 12.0x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $84M | $105M | $109M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $440M | $31M | $132M | $141M |
DAO vs CHGG vs PRDO vs STRA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Youdao, Inc. (DAO) | 100 | 53.4 | -46.6% |
| Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Perdoceo Education … (PRDO) | 100 | 211.5 | +111.5% |
| Strategic Education… (STRA) | 100 | 46.6 | -53.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAO vs CHGG vs PRDO vs STRA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DAO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
CHGG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +79.3% vs STRA's -7.8%
PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.6%
- Rev growth 24.2%, EPS growth 10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs STRA's 114.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 10.8%, current ratio 5.06x
STRA is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.46 vs PRDO's 1.77
- 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.2% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs CHGG's -26.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs CHGG's 2.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.3% vs STRA's -7.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs CHGG's -26.3%, ROIC 15.3% vs -13.4% |
DAO vs CHGG vs PRDO vs STRA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DAO vs CHGG vs PRDO vs STRA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRDO leads in 3 of 6 categories
STRA leads 1 • DAO leads 0 • CHGG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRDO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 18.5x CHGG's $319M. PRDO is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHGG's -26.9%. On growth, DAO holds the edge at +15.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.9B | $319M | $855M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $193M | $11M | $247M | $216M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $107M | -$86M | $170M | $130M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$25M | $221M | $174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.3% | +61.9% | +51.8% | +37.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -11.1% | +24.3% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | -26.9% | +19.9% | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -8.0% | +25.8% | +13.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.0% | -47.9% | +4.1% | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +101.2% | +30.8% | +19.4% |
Valuation Metrics
STRA leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, PRDO trades at a 2% valuation discount to STRA's 14.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STRA offers better value at 1.94x vs PRDO's 2.09x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $375M | $143M | $2.2B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $579M | $196M | $2.1B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -1.33x | 14.23x | 14.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.25x | — | 12.04x | 11.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.09x | 1.94x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.74x | 12.82x | 8.97x | 7.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 0.38x | 2.55x | 1.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.15x | 2.34x | 1.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 9.97x | 11.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRDO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRDO delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-63 for CHGG. STRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHGG's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRA scores 8/9 vs DAO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -62.9% | +17.2% | +7.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | -26.3% | +13.2% | +6.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -13.4% | +15.3% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -26.5% | +17.5% | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.70x | 0.11x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $53M | -$27M | -$32M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $440M | $31M | $132M | $141M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $84M | $105M | $109M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.90x | -525.53x | 50.21x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRDO five years ago would be worth $29,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $150 for CHGG. Over the past 12 months, CHGG leads with a +79.3% total return vs STRA's -7.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 43.5% vs CHGG's -49.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | +30.6% | +18.9% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.6% | +79.3% | +15.4% | -7.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.1% | -87.3% | +195.8% | +3.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.5% | -98.5% | +198.5% | +17.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.0% | -70.8% | +505.6% | +114.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.4% | -49.8% | +43.5% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DAO and PRDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAO currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs CHGG's 67.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 2.97x | 0.48x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.96 | $1.90 | $38.50 | $93.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.00 | $0.53 | $26.66 | $69.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +67.4% | +89.5% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.3 | 63.3 | 46.2 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 66K | 1.3M | 584K | 315K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRDO and STRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DAO as "Buy", CHGG as "Hold", PRDO as "Hold", STRA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2276.6% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs -45.8% for DAO (target: $7). For income investors, STRA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs PRDO's 1.62%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $30.42 | $30.00 | $87.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 22 | 9 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.6% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.56 | $2.52 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.6% | +7.7% |
PRDO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STRA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
DAO vs CHGG vs PRDO vs STRA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAO or CHGG or PRDO or STRA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger pick with 24.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Youdao, Inc. (DAO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAO or CHGG or PRDO or STRA?
On trailing P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the cheapest at 14.
2x versus Strategic Education, Inc. at 14. 6x. On forward P/E, Youdao, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Strategic Education, Inc. wins at 1. 46x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 77x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAO or CHGG or PRDO or STRA?
Over the past 5 years, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) delivered a total return of +198.
5%, compared to -98. 5% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRDO returned +505. 6% versus CHGG's -70. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAO or CHGG or PRDO or STRA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
48β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 97β — meaning CHGG is approximately 513% more volatile than PRDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 70% for Chegg, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DAO or CHGG or PRDO or STRA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is pulling ahead at 24.
2% versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chegg, Inc. grew EPS 88. 1% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Youdao, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRDO leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAO or CHGG or PRDO or STRA?
Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
9% net margin versus -27. 4% for Chegg, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRDO leads at 23. 2% versus -16. 8% for CHGG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRDO leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DAO or CHGG or PRDO or STRA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 46x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 77x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Youdao, Inc. (DAO) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for Perdoceo Education Corporation — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2276. 6% to $30. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — DAO or CHGG or PRDO or STRA?
In this comparison, STRA (3.
2% yield), PRDO (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. DAO, CHGG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DAO or CHGG or PRDO or STRA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), 1. 6% yield, +505. 6% 10Y return). Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) carries a higher beta of 2. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRDO: +505. 6%, CHGG: -70. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DAO and CHGG and PRDO and STRA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DAO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock; STRA is a small-cap deep-value stock. PRDO, STRA pay a dividend while DAO, CHGG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.