Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DASH vs WMT vs AMZN vs ETSY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
DASH vs WMT vs AMZN vs ETSY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $73.19B | $1.04T | $2.96T | $6.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.72B | $703.06B | $742.78B | $2.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $926M | $22.91B | $90.80B | $285M |
| Gross Margin | 50.9% | 24.9% | 50.6% | 72.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 4.1% | 11.5% | 14.3% |
| Forward P/E | 65.9x | 44.7x | 35.3x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.75B | $67.09B | $152.99B | $742M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.38B | $10.73B | $86.81B | $1.40B |
DASH vs WMT vs AMZN vs ETSY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) | 100 | 117.7 | +17.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 270.7 | +170.7% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 168.8 | +68.8% |
| Etsy, Inc. (ETSY) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DASH vs WMT vs AMZN vs ETSY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DASH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.7%
- 27.9% revenue growth vs ETSY's 2.7%
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12 vs AMZN's 1.51
- 0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs WMT's 5.0%
- PEG 1.26 vs WMT's 4.06
- 12.2% margin vs WMT's 3.3%
- +48.6% vs DASH's -11.6%
ETSY is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.22, current ratio 1.44x
- Lower P/E (18.8x vs 44.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.9% revenue growth vs ETSY's 2.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.8x vs 44.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs WMT's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.6% vs DASH's -11.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs DASH's 5.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs 7.9% |
DASH vs WMT vs AMZN vs ETSY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DASH vs WMT vs AMZN vs ETSY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ETSY leads in 1 of 6 categories
AMZN leads 1 • DASH leads 0 • WMT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETSY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 259.4x ETSY's $2.9B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMT's 3.3%. On growth, DASH holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.7B | $703.1B | $742.8B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $42.8B | $155.9B | $508M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $926M | $22.9B | $90.8B | $285M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.9B | $15.3B | -$2.5B | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.9% | +24.9% | +50.6% | +72.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +4.1% | +11.5% | +14.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +3.3% | +12.2% | +9.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +2.2% | -0.3% | +23.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.1% | +5.8% | +16.6% | +3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | +35.1% | +74.8% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMZN and ETSY each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.3x trailing earnings, AMZN trades at a 51% valuation discount to DASH's 78.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.37x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $73.2B | $1.04T | $2.96T | $6.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $72.6B | $1.09T | $3.02T | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 78.86x | 47.65x | 38.35x | 46.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 65.95x | 44.67x | 35.26x | 18.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x | 1.37x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 49.36x | 24.83x | 20.74x | 11.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.34x | 1.45x | 4.12x | 2.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.35x | 10.44x | 7.24x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.67x | 24.94x | 384.26x | 9.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $10 for DASH. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs ETSY's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +22.3% | +23.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | +7.9% | +11.5% | +10.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +14.7% | +14.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +17.5% | +15.3% | +22.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.67x | 0.37x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$627M | $56.4B | $66.2B | -$653M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.4B | $10.7B | $86.8B | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.8B | $67.1B | $153.0B | $742M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.85x | 39.96x | 27.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WMT and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,120 for ETSY. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs DASH's -11.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.5% vs ETSY's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.6% | +15.6% | +21.4% | +13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.6% | +33.0% | +48.6% | +44.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.6% | +160.2% | +159.8% | -30.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.8% | +185.3% | +66.3% | -58.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +505.0% | +715.9% | +685.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.0% | +37.5% | +37.5% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs DASH's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 0.12x | 1.51x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $285.50 | $134.69 | $278.56 | $76.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $143.30 | $91.89 | $183.85 | $44.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.8% | +96.6% | +98.7% | +84.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 58.1 | 80.5 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 17.2M | 45.6M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DASH as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", ETSY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.8% upside for DASH (target: $253) vs 5.4% for WMT (target: $137). WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $253.35 | $137.04 | $306.77 | $70.07 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 64 | 94 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +12.6% |
ETSY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). AMZN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
DASH vs WMT vs AMZN vs ETSY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DASH or WMT or AMZN or ETSY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DoorDash, Inc.
(DASH) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Etsy, Inc. (ETSY). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 38. 3x trailing P/E (35. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DASH or WMT or AMZN or ETSY?
On trailing P/E, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 38. 3x versus DoorDash, Inc. at 78. 9x. On forward P/E, Etsy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 26x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DASH or WMT or AMZN or ETSY?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to -58. 8% for Etsy, Inc. (ETSY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus DASH's -11. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DASH or WMT or AMZN or ETSY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 1194% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DASH or WMT or AMZN or ETSY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DoorDash, Inc.
(DASH) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus 2. 7% for Etsy, Inc. (ETSY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DoorDash, Inc. grew EPS 634. 5% year-over-year, compared to -40. 9% for Etsy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DASH leads at 27. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DASH or WMT or AMZN or ETSY?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETSY leads at 12. 8% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETSY leads at 71. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DASH or WMT or AMZN or ETSY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 26x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Etsy, Inc. (ETSY) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 65. 9x for DoorDash, Inc. — 47. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DASH: 50. 8% to $253. 35.
08Which pays a better dividend — DASH or WMT or AMZN or ETSY?
In this comparison, WMT (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. DASH, AMZN, ETSY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DASH or WMT or AMZN or ETSY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +505. 0%, DASH: -11. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DASH and WMT and AMZN and ETSY?
These companies operate in different sectors (DASH (Communication Services) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and ETSY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DASH is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ETSY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WMT pays a dividend while DASH, AMZN, ETSY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.