DAVA vs EXLS

For growth investors, ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Endava plc (DAVA). Endava plc (DAVA) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (4. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ExlService Holdings, Inc. (EXLS) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Endava plc (DAVA) is the cheapest at 8.

5x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, Endava plc is actually cheaper at 4. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) delivered a total return of +60. 0%, compared to -95. 4% for Endava plc (DAVA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXLS returned +218. 8% versus DAVA's -83. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Endava plc's 1. 77β — meaning DAVA is approximately 175% more volatile than EXLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Endava plc (DAVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 44% for ExlService Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus 4. 3% for Endava plc (DAVA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ExlService Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 27. 3% year-over-year, compared to 24. 1% for Endava plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXLS leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus 2. 7% for Endava plc — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXLS leads at 15. 0% versus 4. 1% for DAVA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXLS leads at 38. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Endava plc (DAVA) trades at 4.

9x forward P/E versus 13. 9x for ExlService Holdings, Inc. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DAVA: 189. 9% to $12. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(EXLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), +218. 8% 10Y return). Endava plc (DAVA) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXLS: +218. 8%, DAVA: -83. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: DAVA is a small-cap deep-value stock; EXLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.