Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DCGO vs AMR vs HCC vs OPRX vs DOCS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Coal
Coal
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
DCGO vs AMR vs HCC vs OPRX vs DOCS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Coal | Coal | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $56M | $2.35B | $4.53B | $120M | $5.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $330M | $2.12B | $1.47B | $109M | $638M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-182.40T | $-39M | $138M | $5M | $239M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 1.5% | 38.2% | 67.3% | 89.7% |
| Operating Margin | -55.3% | -1.1% | 9.7% | 10.7% | 37.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.9x | 12.8x | 6.8x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $29.18T | $23M | $271M | $5M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52.48T | $366M | $300M | $23M | $210M |
DCGO vs AMR vs HCC vs OPRX vs DOCS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DocGo Inc. (DCGO) | 100 | 5.7 | -94.3% |
| Alpha Metallurgical… (AMR) | 100 | 718.3 | +618.3% |
| Warrior Met Coal, I… (HCC) | 100 | 499.2 | +399.2% |
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 10.4 | -89.6% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 44.6 | -55.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DCGO vs AMR vs HCC vs OPRX vs DOCS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DCGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 523K%, EPS growth -11.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 89.1%
- 523K% revenue growth vs AMR's -28.0%
AMR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 12.6% 10Y total return vs HCC's 11.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 4.47x
HCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 0.4%
- Beta 0.57, yield 0.4%, current ratio 3.19x
- Beta 0.57 vs OPRX's 2.14
- 0.4% yield, vs AMR's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
OPRX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 16.8x)
DOCS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 37.5% margin vs DCGO's -56.6%
- 20.7% ROA vs DCGO's -336.1%, ROIC 20.0% vs -260.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 523K% revenue growth vs AMR's -28.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 16.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs DCGO's -56.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs OPRX's 2.14 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, vs AMR's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +90.3% vs DCGO's -75.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.7% ROA vs DCGO's -336.1%, ROIC 20.0% vs -260.4% |
DCGO vs AMR vs HCC vs OPRX vs DOCS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DCGO vs AMR vs HCC vs OPRX vs DOCS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
HCC leads 2 • DCGO leads 1 • AMR leads 0 • OPRX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 19.4x OPRX's $109M. DOCS is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DCGO's -56.6%. On growth, DCGO holds the edge at +999999.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $330M | $2.1B | $1.5B | $109M | $638M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$174.09T | $163M | $289M | $16M | $250M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$182.40T | -$39M | $138M | $5M | $239M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19.47T | $22M | -$135M | $12M | $314M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | +1.5% | +38.2% | +67.3% | +89.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -55.3% | -1.1% | +9.7% | +10.7% | +37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -56.6% | -1.8% | +9.4% | +4.7% | +37.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +1.1% | -9.2% | +10.6% | +49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +999999.0% | -1.3% | +53.8% | -0.2% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.8% | +66.9% | +9.6% | — | -16.2% |
Valuation Metrics
DCGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.4x trailing earnings, DOCS trades at a 71% valuation discount to HCC's 79.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPRX's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DOCS's 21.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56M | $2.4B | $4.5B | $120M | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$23.31T | $2.0B | $4.5B | $101M | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.31x | -38.76x | 79.51x | 23.85x | 23.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.88x | 12.77x | 6.84x | 16.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.29x | 19.10x | 6.33x | 21.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 1.10x | 3.46x | 1.10x | 9.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.55x | 2.11x | 0.95x | 4.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.00x | 132.38x | — | 6.43x | 19.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-6 for DCGO. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DCGO's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs HCC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.8% | -2.5% | +6.4% | +4.2% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.4% | -1.7% | +5.0% | +3.0% | +20.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | -3.9% | +1.8% | +7.1% | +20.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | -2.9% | +1.8% | +7.6% | +22.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.02x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$23.31T | -$343M | -$29M | -$19M | -$197M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52.48T | $366M | $300M | $23M | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29.18T | $23M | $271M | $5M | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -28.14x | 14.30x | 1.26x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMR five years ago would be worth $126,720 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $573 for DCGO. Over the past 12 months, HCC leads with a +90.3% total return vs DCGO's -75.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCC at 31.5% vs DCGO's -59.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.8% | -9.3% | -3.9% | -48.1% | -40.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.5% | +48.5% | +90.3% | -35.0% | -56.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | +16.8% | +127.3% | -55.7% | -24.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | +1167.2% | +469.8% | -85.7% | -51.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | +1257.8% | +1180.3% | +104.4% | -51.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.3% | +5.3% | +31.5% | -23.8% | -8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HCC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPRX's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HCC currently trades 81.5% from its 52-week high vs DCGO's 23.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 0.93x | 0.57x | 2.14x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.45 | $253.82 | $105.34 | $22.25 | $76.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.49 | $97.41 | $40.80 | $5.54 | $20.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.3% | +72.5% | +81.5% | +28.9% | +34.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.8 | 49.8 | 49.1 | 49.9 | 62.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 276K | 846K | 475K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DCGO and HCC and OPRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMR as "Hold", HCC as "Hold", OPRX as "Buy", DOCS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 164.0% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 2.9% for AMR (target: $190). HCC is the only dividend payer here at 0.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $189.50 | $112.50 | $17.00 | $42.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 24 | 15 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +0.4% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.03 | $0.34 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +2.3% |
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HCC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
DCGO vs AMR vs HCC vs OPRX vs DOCS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DCGO or AMR or HCC or OPRX or DOCS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DocGo Inc.
(DCGO) is the stronger pick with 522574% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 0% for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DCGO or AMR or HCC or OPRX or DOCS?
On trailing P/E, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus Warrior Met Coal, Inc. at 79. 5x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DCGO or AMR or HCC or OPRX or DOCS?
Over the past 5 years, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
(AMR) delivered a total return of +1167%, compared to -94. 3% for DocGo Inc. (DCGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMR returned +1258% versus DCGO's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DCGO or AMR or HCC or OPRX or DOCS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
(HCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus OptimizeRx Corporation's 2. 14β — meaning OPRX is approximately 277% more volatile than HCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 23% for DocGo Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DCGO or AMR or HCC or OPRX or DOCS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DocGo Inc.
(DCGO) is pulling ahead at 522574% versus -28. 0% for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimizeRx Corporation grew EPS 124. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1122. 2% for DocGo Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DCGO leads at 89. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DCGO or AMR or HCC or OPRX or DOCS?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus -56. 6% for DocGo Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -55. 3% for DCGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DCGO or AMR or HCC or OPRX or DOCS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 6.
8x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 164. 0% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DCGO or AMR or HCC or OPRX or DOCS?
In this comparison, HCC (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. DCGO, AMR, OPRX, DOCS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DCGO or AMR or HCC or OPRX or DOCS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
(HCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), +1180% 10Y return). DocGo Inc. (DCGO) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCC: +1180%, DCGO: -94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DCGO and AMR and HCC and OPRX and DOCS?
These companies operate in different sectors (DCGO (Healthcare) and AMR (Energy) and HCC (Energy) and OPRX (Healthcare) and DOCS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DCGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.