Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DCGO vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX vs DOCS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Equipment & Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
DCGO vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX vs DOCS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Equipment & Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $63M | $6.63B | $1.26B | $124M | $5.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $330M | $2.35B | $2.51B | $109M | $638M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-182.40T | $128M | $-171M | $5M | $239M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 69.7% | 65.6% | 67.3% | 89.7% |
| Operating Margin | -55.3% | 4.6% | -7.6% | 10.7% | 37.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 51.5x | — | 7.0x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $29.18T | $1.12B | $1.04B | $5M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52.48T | $229M | $781M | $23M | $210M |
DCGO vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX vs DOCS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DocGo Inc. (DCGO) | 100 | 6.4 | -93.6% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 235.7 | +135.7% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 4.2 | -95.8% |
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 10.7 | -89.3% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 44.7 | -55.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DCGO vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX vs DOCS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DCGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.27
- Rev growth 523K%, EPS growth -11.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 89.1%
- 523K% revenue growth vs TDOC's -1.5%
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs OPRX's 110.5%
TDOC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +1.5% vs DCGO's -73.6%
OPRX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 16.8x)
DOCS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 6.97x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 6.97x
- 37.5% margin vs DCGO's -56.6%
- Beta 1.03 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 523K% revenue growth vs TDOC's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 16.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs DCGO's -56.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.5% vs DCGO's -73.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.7% ROA vs DCGO's -336.1%, ROIC 20.0% vs -260.4% |
DCGO vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX vs DOCS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DCGO vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX vs DOCS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
DCGO leads 1 • HIMS leads 1 • TDOC leads 0 • OPRX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 23.0x OPRX's $109M. DOCS is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DCGO's -56.6%. On growth, DCGO holds the edge at +999999.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $330M | $2.3B | $2.5B | $109M | $638M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$174.09T | $164M | $42M | $16M | $250M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$182.40T | $128M | -$171M | $5M | $239M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19.47T | $73M | $251M | $12M | $314M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | +69.7% | +65.6% | +67.3% | +89.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -55.3% | +4.6% | -7.6% | +10.7% | +37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -56.6% | +5.5% | -6.8% | +4.7% | +37.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +3.1% | +10.0% | +10.6% | +49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +999999.0% | +28.4% | -2.5% | -0.2% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.8% | -27.3% | +32.1% | — | -16.2% |
Valuation Metrics
DCGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.5x trailing earnings, DOCS trades at a 53% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPRX's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $63M | $6.6B | $1.3B | $124M | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$23.31T | $7.5B | $1.5B | $105M | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.34x | 50.32x | -6.11x | 24.56x | 23.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 51.51x | — | 7.04x | 16.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 42.68x | 15.13x | 6.55x | 21.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 2.82x | 0.50x | 1.13x | 9.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 12.25x | 0.89x | 0.98x | 4.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.00x | 89.61x | 4.40x | 6.62x | 19.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-6 for DCGO. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.8% | +23.7% | -12.4% | +4.2% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.4% | +6.0% | -5.9% | +3.0% | +20.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | +10.7% | -11.5% | +7.1% | +20.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | +10.9% | -10.0% | +7.6% | +22.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 2.07x | 0.75x | 0.04x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$23.31T | $892M | $259M | -$19M | -$197M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52.48T | $229M | $781M | $23M | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29.18T | $1.1B | $1.0B | $5M | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -8.76x | 1.26x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $461 for TDOC. Over the past 12 months, TDOC leads with a +1.5% total return vs DCGO's -73.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs DCGO's -57.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.6% | -23.2% | -1.3% | -46.6% | -39.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.6% | -51.0% | +1.5% | -30.1% | -55.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.5% | +116.6% | -73.3% | -54.4% | -24.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.6% | +137.6% | -95.4% | -87.3% | -50.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | +161.9% | -41.1% | +110.5% | -50.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.8% | +29.4% | -35.6% | -23.0% | -8.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TDOC and DOCS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOCS is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TDOC currently trades 71.2% from its 52-week high vs DCGO's 25.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.27x | 2.40x | 1.91x | 2.28x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.45 | $70.43 | $9.77 | $22.25 | $76.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.49 | $13.74 | $4.40 | $5.54 | $20.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.9% | +36.4% | +71.2% | +29.8% | +34.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 54.5 | 74.1 | 46.9 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 34.9M | 5.5M | 476K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HIMS as "Hold", TDOC as "Hold", OPRX as "Buy", DOCS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 156.4% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 8.9% for TDOC (target: $8).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.67 | $7.58 | $17.00 | $42.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 42 | 15 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.3% |
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DCGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DCGO vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX vs DOCS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DCGO or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX or DOCS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DocGo Inc.
(DCGO) is the stronger pick with 522574% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DCGO or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX or DOCS?
On trailing P/E, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DCGO or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX or DOCS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -95. 4% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus DCGO's -93. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DCGO or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX or DOCS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 134% more volatile than DOCS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DCGO or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX or DOCS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DocGo Inc.
(DCGO) is pulling ahead at 522574% versus -1. 5% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimizeRx Corporation grew EPS 124. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1122. 2% for DocGo Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DCGO leads at 89. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DCGO or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX or DOCS?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus -56. 6% for DocGo Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -55. 3% for DCGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DCGO or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX or DOCS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 7.
0x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 44. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 156. 4% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DCGO or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX or DOCS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DCGO or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX or DOCS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03)). DocGo Inc. (DCGO) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOCS: -50. 9%, DCGO: -93. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DCGO and HIMS and TDOC and OPRX and DOCS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DCGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.