Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DCOM vs SI vs NBTB vs TRST vs PFBC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Specialties
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
DCOM vs SI vs NBTB vs TRST vs PFBC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Medical - Specialties | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.61B | $275M | $2.35B | $864M | $1.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $730M | $32M | $867M | $278M | $499M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $111M | $-16M | $169M | $61M | $134M |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | 77.0% | 72.1% | 67.1% | 55.0% |
| Operating Margin | 21.5% | -46.3% | 25.3% | 29.2% | 38.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | — | 10.8x | 17.0x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $371M | $15M | $327M | $193M | $384M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.35B | $6M | $185M | $51M | $807M |
DCOM vs SI vs NBTB vs TRST vs PFBC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 171.8 | +71.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.6 | +43.6% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 154.8 | +54.8% |
| Preferred Bank (PFBC) | 100 | 246.6 | +146.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DCOM vs SI vs NBTB vs TRST vs PFBC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
SI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 64.1% revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
Among these 5 stocks, NBTB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TRST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +56.4% vs SI's -11.2%
PFBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 3.2%
- 249.9% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 101.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 149.60x
- PEG 0.50 vs TRST's 4.69
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.1% revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 17.0x), PEG 0.50 vs 4.69 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.8% margin vs SI's -49.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs DCOM's 1.04 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.4% vs SI's -11.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs SI's -32.1% |
DCOM vs SI vs NBTB vs TRST vs PFBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DCOM vs SI vs NBTB vs TRST vs PFBC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFBC leads in 1 of 6 categories
DCOM leads 1 • SI leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • TRST leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 27.4x SI's $32M. PFBC is the more profitable business, keeping 26.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SI's -49.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $730M | $32M | $867M | $278M | $499M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $161M | — | $241M | $90M | $191M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $111M | — | $169M | $61M | $134M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $182M | — | $225M | $46M | $167M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.1% | +77.0% | +72.1% | +67.1% | +55.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | -46.3% | +25.3% | +29.2% | +38.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | -49.4% | +19.5% | +22.0% | +26.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | -57.4% | +25.2% | +16.4% | +33.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | — | +39.5% | +44.1% | +24.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DCOM and PFBC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.9x trailing earnings, PFBC trades at a 42% valuation discount to DCOM's 15.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFBC offers better value at 0.51x vs TRST's 4.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $275M | $2.3B | $864M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$371M | $284M | $2.5B | $1.0B | $705M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.44x | -17.36x | 13.51x | 15.01x | 8.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.52x | — | 10.80x | 16.99x | 8.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.42x | — | 1.92x | 4.14x | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -2.37x | — | 10.33x | 11.21x | 3.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.21x | 8.70x | 2.71x | 3.10x | 2.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | — | 1.21x | 1.30x | 1.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.84x | — | 10.73x | 18.88x | 6.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DCOM and PFBC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFBC delivers a 17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $8 for DCOM. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFBC's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs SI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.7% | — | +9.5% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | -32.1% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | — | +7.9% | +7.2% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | -34.3% | +2.4% | +2.8% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | — | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.0B | $9M | $142M | $142M | -$423M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $6M | $185M | $51M | $807M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $371M | $15M | $327M | $193M | $384M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.57x | -11.13x | 1.05x | 0.90x | 0.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFBC five years ago would be worth $16,059 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,884 for SI. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +56.4% total return vs SI's -11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DCOM at 35.9% vs SI's -3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.2% | -7.0% | +9.0% | +19.1% | -1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.4% | -11.2% | +4.0% | +56.4% | +12.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.8% | -11.2% | +51.1% | +92.4% | +124.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.7% | -11.2% | +35.1% | +50.8% | +60.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.6% | -11.2% | +101.0% | +97.3% | +249.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.9% | -3.9% | +14.7% | +24.4% | +30.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRST and PFBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DCOM's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs SI's 74.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.77x | 0.88x | 0.75x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.90 | $17.94 | $46.92 | $49.21 | $103.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.57 | $10.92 | $39.20 | $30.17 | $79.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +74.5% | +95.9% | +99.1% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 46.3 | 53.2 | 61.3 | 48.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 280K | 87K | 238K | 108K | 102K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and PFBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DCOM as "Hold", SI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", TRST as "Hold", PFBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.1% upside for SI (target: $21) vs 2.3% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, PFBC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.22% vs DCOM's 2.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.50 | $21.00 | $46.00 | — | $102.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | — | +3.2% | +3.1% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 12 | 8 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | — | $1.43 | $1.51 | $2.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +4.4% | +8.2% |
PFBC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). DCOM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
DCOM vs SI vs NBTB vs TRST vs PFBC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DCOM or SI or NBTB or TRST or PFBC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SHOULDER INNOVATIONS, INC.
(SI) is the stronger pick with 64. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). Preferred Bank (PFBC) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SHOULDER INNOVATIONS, INC. (SI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DCOM or SI or NBTB or TRST or PFBC?
On trailing P/E, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the cheapest at 8.
9x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. at 15. 4x. On forward P/E, Preferred Bank is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Preferred Bank wins at 0. 50x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DCOM or SI or NBTB or TRST or PFBC?
Over the past 5 years, Preferred Bank (PFBC) delivered a total return of +60.
6%, compared to -11. 2% for SHOULDER INNOVATIONS, INC. (SI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFBC returned +249. 9% versus SI's -11. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DCOM or SI or NBTB or TRST or PFBC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 04β — meaning DCOM is approximately 56% more volatile than PFBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 49% for Preferred Bank — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DCOM or SI or NBTB or TRST or PFBC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SHOULDER INNOVATIONS, INC.
(SI) is pulling ahead at 64. 1% versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to -22. 2% for SHOULDER INNOVATIONS, INC.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DCOM or SI or NBTB or TRST or PFBC?
Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
8% net margin versus -49. 4% for SHOULDER INNOVATIONS, INC. — meaning it keeps 26. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFBC leads at 38. 0% versus -46. 3% for SI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SI leads at 77. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DCOM or SI or NBTB or TRST or PFBC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 50x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Preferred Bank (PFBC) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 17. 0x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SI: 57. 1% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DCOM or SI or NBTB or TRST or PFBC?
In this comparison, PFBC (3.
2% yield), NBTB (3. 2% yield), TRST (3. 1% yield), DCOM (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DCOM or SI or NBTB or TRST or PFBC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 3. 2% yield, +249. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFBC: +249. 9%, SI: -11. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DCOM and SI and NBTB and TRST and PFBC?
These companies operate in different sectors (DCOM (Financial Services) and SI (Healthcare) and NBTB (Financial Services) and TRST (Financial Services) and PFBC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock. DCOM, NBTB, TRST, PFBC pay a dividend while SI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.