Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DDL vs CANG vs JD vs BABA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
DDL vs CANG vs JD vs BABA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $574M | $304M | $46.34B | $338.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23.90B | $3.46B | $1.30T | $1.01T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $331M | $-178M | $32.20B | $123.35B |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 13.6% | 12.7% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 7.3% | 1.3% | 10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 1.4x | 6.9x | 1.4x | 4.2x |
| Total Debt | $3.03B | $170M | $89.77B | $248.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $887M | $1.29B | $108.35B | $181.73B |
DDL vs CANG vs JD vs BABA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dingdong (Cayman) L… (DDL) | 100 | 6.7 | -93.3% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 23.3 | -76.7% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 37.8 | -62.2% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 61.8 | -38.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DDL vs CANG vs JD vs BABA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DDL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 295.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, current ratio 1.02x
- 15.5% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
- Beta 0.90 vs CANG's 2.49
CANG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 2.6%
- Beta 1.04, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.29x
- Lower P/E (1.4x vs 4.2x)
- 2.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BABA's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 82.2% 10Y total return vs CANG's -43.2%
- 12.2% margin vs CANG's -5.2%
- +12.9% vs CANG's -69.4%
- 6.7% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC 9.6% vs 4.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 4.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs CANG's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs CANG's 2.49 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BABA's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.9% vs CANG's -69.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC 9.6% vs 4.6% |
DDL vs CANG vs JD vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DDL vs CANG vs JD vs BABA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BABA leads in 2 of 6 categories
CANG leads 1 • DDL leads 0 • JD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 376.9x CANG's $3.5B. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CANG's -5.2%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23.9B | $3.5B | $1.30T | $1.01T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $380M | $333M | $23.8B | $114.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $331M | -$178M | $32.2B | $123.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $677M | $0 | $9.1B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +13.6% | +12.7% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +7.3% | +1.3% | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -5.2% | +2.5% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | -154.0% | +0.7% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +58.3% | +14.9% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +3.6% | -56.3% | -52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CANG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 61% valuation discount to BABA's 17.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DDL's 18.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $574M | $304M | $46.3B | $338.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $889M | $140M | $43.6B | $348.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.85x | 6.89x | 7.62x | 17.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.44x | — | 1.43x | 4.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.28x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.37x | 5.12x | 6.38x | 13.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 2.57x | 0.27x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.23x | 0.51x | 1.01x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.70x | — | 7.12x | 29.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DDL and BABA each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DDL delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CANG. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DDL's 3.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DDL scores 7/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +35.7% | -4.1% | +10.5% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | -2.3% | +4.6% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +4.6% | +9.9% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +4.5% | +10.2% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.28x | 0.04x | 0.29x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | -$1.1B | -$18.6B | $66.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $887M | $1.3B | $108.3B | $181.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $170M | $89.8B | $248.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.92x | -1.87x | 12.85x | 15.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BABA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $10,206 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,084 for DDL. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +12.9% total return vs CANG's -69.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 20.2% vs DDL's -14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.1% | -53.7% | +5.4% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.4% | -69.4% | -8.8% | +12.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.6% | +23.2% | -8.4% | +73.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | +2.1% | -51.3% | -34.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | -43.2% | +48.4% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.1% | +7.2% | -2.9% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DDL and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DDL is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JD currently trades 79.1% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 22.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 2.49x | 1.04x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.41 | $2.88 | $38.08 | $192.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.65 | $0.33 | $24.51 | $103.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.8% | +22.7% | +79.1% | +72.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.4 | 57.3 | 53.5 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 546K | 1.4M | 10.1M | 10.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CANG and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DDL as "Buy", CANG as "Buy", JD as "Buy", BABA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 359.6% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 9.1% for JD (target: $33). For income investors, JD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.62% vs BABA's 1.27%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.00 | $32.86 | $194.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 2 | 45 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.6% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.37 | $12.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +4.4% | +8.2% | +3.8% |
BABA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CANG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
DDL vs CANG vs JD vs BABA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DDL or CANG or JD or BABA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is the stronger pick with 15.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DDL or CANG or JD or BABA?
On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited at 17. 8x. On forward P/E, JD. com, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DDL or CANG or JD or BABA?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of +2. 1%, compared to -89. 2% for Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +82. 2% versus DDL's -89. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DDL or CANG or JD or BABA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 49β — meaning CANG is approximately 178% more volatile than DDL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Dingdong (Cayman) Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DDL or CANG or JD or BABA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is pulling ahead at 15.
5% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 70. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, JD leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DDL or CANG or JD or BABA?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus 1. 3% for Dingdong (Cayman) Limited — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus 0. 9% for DDL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DDL or CANG or JD or BABA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) trades at 1. 4x forward P/E versus 4. 2x for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 359. 6% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DDL or CANG or JD or BABA?
In this comparison, JD (2.
6% yield), BABA (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. DDL, CANG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DDL or CANG or JD or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), 2. 6% yield). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JD: +48. 4%, CANG: -43. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DDL and CANG and JD and BABA?
These companies operate in different sectors (DDL (Consumer Defensive) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and JD (Consumer Cyclical) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DDL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock. JD, BABA pay a dividend while DDL, CANG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.