REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DEA vs GTY vs NNN vs GOOD vs O
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Retail
DEA vs GTY vs NNN vs GOOD vs O — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.08B | $2.00B | $8.47B | $616M | $57.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $344M | $227M | $936M | $166M | $5.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $91M | $387M | $21M | $800M |
| Gross Margin | 49.7% | 27.3% | 81.4% | -11.7% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.9% | 58.7% | 63.3% | 27.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 69.5x | 22.0x | 21.7x | 83.0x | 37.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.68B | $1.06B | $4.82B | $856M | $32.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $13M | $5M | $11M | $435M |
DEA vs GTY vs NNN vs GOOD vs O — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Easterly Government… (DEA) | 100 | 37.2 | -62.8% |
| Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) | 100 | 124.0 | +24.0% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 71.0 | -29.0% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 115.4 | +15.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DEA vs GTY vs NNN vs GOOD vs O
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DEA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and momentum.
- 11.3% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6%
- +25.0% vs GOOD's +0.7%
GTY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 5.8%
- 133.4% 10Y total return vs O's 45.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 98.5%, current ratio 29.85x
- Beta 0.05, yield 5.8%, current ratio 29.85x
NNN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.94 vs GOOD's 2.34
- Lower P/E (21.7x vs 37.1x), PEG 1.94 vs 71.28
- 41.4% margin vs DEA's 4.3%
GOOD is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 11.4% yield, vs O's 5.2%
O is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth 19.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 37.1x), PEG 1.94 vs 71.28 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs DEA's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs GOOD's 0.55, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield, vs O's 5.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.0% vs GOOD's +0.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs DEA's 0.4%, ROIC 4.6% vs 2.1% |
DEA vs GTY vs NNN vs GOOD vs O — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DEA vs GTY vs NNN vs GOOD vs O — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NNN leads in 1 of 6 categories
DEA leads 1 • GOOD leads 1 • GTY leads 0 • O leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
O is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 35.7x GOOD's $166M. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DEA's 4.3%. On growth, O holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $344M | $227M | $936M | $166M | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $203M | $197M | $867M | $106M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $91M | $387M | $21M | $800M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $262M | $131M | $464M | $90M | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.7% | +27.3% | +81.4% | -11.7% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | +58.7% | +63.3% | +27.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +40.1% | +41.4% | +12.7% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +76.2% | +57.8% | +49.6% | +54.1% | +67.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | +10.5% | +4.1% | +11.8% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -55.4% | +76.0% | -2.0% | +2.8% | -103.6% |
Valuation Metrics
DEA leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, NNN trades at a 73% valuation discount to DEA's 80.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOD offers better value at 0.88x vs O's 71.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $2.0B | $8.5B | $616M | $57.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $3.0B | $13.3B | $1.5B | $90.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 80.31x | 24.45x | 21.50x | 31.02x | 52.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 69.52x | 21.99x | 21.69x | 82.97x | 37.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.93x | 0.88x | 71.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.85x | 16.54x | 15.85x | 12.36x | 21.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 9.00x | 9.14x | 3.82x | 10.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 1.74x | 1.90x | 1.76x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.16x | 15.71x | 12.69x | 9.17x | 14.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NNN and GOOD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $1 for DEA. O carries lower financial leverage with a 0.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOD's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTY scores 5/9 vs GOOD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.1% | +8.8% | +8.8% | +9.7% | +2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +4.3% | +4.1% | +1.7% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +4.6% | +4.8% | +4.4% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +6.3% | +6.4% | +5.3% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.23x | 0.98x | 1.09x | 2.50x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $1.0B | $4.8B | $846M | $32.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $13M | $5M | $11M | $435M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $1.1B | $4.8B | $856M | $32.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.18x | 2.71x | 2.93x | 1.46x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTY five years ago would be worth $13,219 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,297 for DEA. Over the past 12 months, DEA leads with a +25.0% total return vs GOOD's +0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOD at 12.9% vs DEA's -5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.5% | +21.5% | +15.6% | +21.6% | +9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.0% | +23.6% | +12.4% | +0.7% | +14.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.2% | +12.4% | +15.1% | +43.8% | +13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.0% | +32.2% | +15.0% | -9.7% | +16.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.7% | +133.4% | +37.8% | +51.0% | +45.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.7% | +4.0% | +4.8% | +12.9% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GTY and NNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOD's 0.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs GOOD's 84.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.05x | 0.15x | 0.55x | 0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.94 | $34.75 | $46.03 | $15.03 | $67.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.82 | $25.39 | $38.90 | $10.33 | $54.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +95.0% | +96.7% | +84.6% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 48.6 | 58.4 | 49.1 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 381K | 415K | 1.5M | 390K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GOOD and O each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DEA as "Hold", GTY as "Buy", NNN as "Hold", GOOD as "Buy", O as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.6% upside for O (target: $65) vs -29.5% for DEA (target: $16). For income investors, GOOD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.35% vs O's 5.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.41 | $34.00 | $46.06 | $13.00 | $65.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 13 | 29 | 14 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.0% | +5.8% | +5.3% | +11.4% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.10 | $1.92 | $2.36 | $1.44 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
NNN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). DEA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
DEA vs GTY vs NNN vs GOOD vs O: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DEA or GTY or NNN or GOOD or O a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DEA or GTY or NNN or GOOD or O?
On trailing P/E, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus Easterly Government Properties, Inc. at 80. 3x. On forward P/E, NNN REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NNN REIT, Inc. wins at 1. 94x versus Realty Income Corporation's 71. 28x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DEA or GTY or NNN or GOOD or O?
Over the past 5 years, Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) delivered a total return of +32. 2%, compared to -37. 0% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTY returned +133. 4% versus DEA's -8. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DEA or GTY or NNN or GOOD or O?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation's 0. 55β — meaning GOOD is approximately 961% more volatile than GTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Realty Income Corporation (O) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 3% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DEA or GTY or NNN or GOOD or O?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gladstone Commercial Corporation grew EPS 57. 7% year-over-year, compared to -37. 0% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, O leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DEA or GTY or NNN or GOOD or O?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus 3. 9% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNN leads at 61. 5% versus 24. 9% for DEA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — O leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DEA or GTY or NNN or GOOD or O more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 94x versus Realty Income Corporation's 71. 28x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 83. 0x for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — 61. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for O: 5. 6% to $65. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — DEA or GTY or NNN or GOOD or O?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 5. 2% for Realty Income Corporation (O).
09Is DEA or GTY or NNN or GOOD or O better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 5. 8% yield, +133. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTY: +133. 4%, DEA: -8. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DEA and GTY and NNN and GOOD and O?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.