Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs STZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Food Distribution
Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs STZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries | Specialty Retail | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Food Distribution | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries |
| Market Cap | $46.38B | $1.04T | $337.62B | $34.91B | $26.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37.37B | $703.06B | $49.28B | $83.57B | $9.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.49B | $22.91B | $13.70B | $1.74B | $1.11B |
| Gross Margin | 60.0% | 24.9% | 61.7% | 18.5% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | 4.1% | 29.3% | 3.6% | 34.5% |
| Forward P/E | 17.8x | 44.7x | 24.1x | 15.9x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $24.40B | $67.09B | $45.49B | $14.49B | $12.11B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.20B | $10.73B | $10.27B | $1.07B | $68M |
DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs STZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diageo plc (DEO) | 100 | 59.3 | -40.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 168.0 | +68.0% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.1 | +32.1% |
| Constellation Brand… (STZ) | 100 | 87.0 | -13.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs STZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DEO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.37, yield 4.9%, current ratio 1.63x
- 4.9% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8%
- 14.7% ROA vs STZ's 5.1%, ROIC 9.6% vs 13.0%
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs KO's 111.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1%
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.29 vs WMT's 4.06
STZ is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 24.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs DEO's -0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 24.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs SYY's 0.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.9% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs DEO's -25.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.7% ROA vs STZ's 5.1%, ROIC 9.6% vs 13.0% |
DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs STZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs STZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 1 of 6 categories
STZ leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • DEO leads 0 • SYY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 74.9x STZ's $9.4B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYY's 2.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37.4B | $703.1B | $49.3B | $83.6B | $9.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11.6B | $42.8B | $15.5B | $4.0B | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.5B | $22.9B | $13.7B | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.7B | $15.3B | $12.6B | $2.0B | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.0% | +24.9% | +61.7% | +18.5% | +52.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +4.1% | +29.3% | +3.6% | +34.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +3.3% | +27.8% | +2.1% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +2.2% | +25.5% | +2.4% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.1% | +5.8% | +12.1% | +4.7% | -9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.1% | +35.1% | +18.2% | -13.4% | -15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
STZ leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, SYY trades at a 59% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46.4B | $1.04T | $337.6B | $34.9B | $26.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $68.6B | $1.09T | $372.8B | $48.3B | $38.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.68x | 47.69x | 25.80x | 19.54x | -333.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.82x | 44.71x | 24.11x | 15.88x | 12.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.64x | 4.33x | 2.31x | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.33x | 24.85x | 25.17x | 11.58x | 9.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.29x | 1.46x | 7.04x | 0.43x | 2.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.53x | 10.45x | 9.87x | 19.23x | 3.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.27x | 24.97x | 63.75x | 19.60x | 13.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — WMT and KO and SYY and STZ each lead in 2 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $14 for STZ. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs STZ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +54.0% | +22.3% | +41.1% | +80.7% | +13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.7% | +7.9% | +13.1% | +6.4% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.6% | +14.7% | +15.8% | +15.7% | +13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.7% | +17.5% | +17.3% | +19.0% | +18.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.85x | 0.67x | 1.33x | 7.81x | 1.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22.2B | $56.4B | $35.2B | $13.4B | $12.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.2B | $10.7B | $10.3B | $1.1B | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24.4B | $67.1B | $45.5B | $14.5B | $12.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.71x | 11.85x | 10.70x | 4.35x | 5.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,612 for DEO. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs DEO's -25.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs DEO's -20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.3% | +15.7% | +14.3% | +1.9% | +7.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.1% | +32.7% | +11.2% | +6.4% | -18.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | +160.5% | +31.9% | +4.0% | -29.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.9% | +186.9% | +61.1% | -3.9% | -30.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.0% | +499.5% | +111.2% | +82.2% | +12.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.3% | +37.6% | +9.7% | +1.3% | -10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SYY's 0.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs DEO's 71.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | 0.12x | -0.09x | 0.47x | 0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $116.69 | $134.69 | $82.00 | $91.69 | $196.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $72.46 | $91.89 | $65.35 | $68.19 | $126.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.5% | +96.7% | +95.7% | +79.5% | +76.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.5 | 55.9 | 61.7 | 41.7 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 17.2M | 13.4M | 4.7M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DEO and WMT and SYY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DEO as "Hold", WMT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", SYY as "Buy", STZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.6% upside for DEO (target: $124) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, DEO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.95% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $124.00 | $137.04 | $85.71 | $90.44 | $175.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 64 | 48 | 30 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.9% | +0.7% | +2.6% | +2.8% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 37 | 35 | 37 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.13 | $0.94 | $2.04 | $2.04 | $4.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +3.6% | +4.3% |
KO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). STZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs STZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DEO or WMT or KO or SYY or STZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 1% for Diageo plc (DEO). Sysco Corporation (SYY) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DEO or WMT or KO or SYY or STZ?
On trailing P/E, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the cheapest at 19.
5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Constellation Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DEO or WMT or KO or SYY or STZ?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -43. 9% for Diageo plc (DEO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus DEO's +10. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DEO or WMT or KO or SYY or STZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
09β versus Sysco Corporation's 0. 47β — meaning SYY is approximately -633% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DEO or WMT or KO or SYY or STZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -0. 1% for Diageo plc (DEO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -104. 8% for Constellation Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DEO leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DEO or WMT or KO or SYY or STZ?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -0. 8% for Constellation Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STZ leads at 35. 5% versus 3. 8% for SYY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DEO or WMT or KO or SYY or STZ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 32. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DEO: 48. 6% to $124. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DEO or WMT or KO or SYY or STZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Diageo plc (DEO) offers the highest yield at 4. 9%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is DEO or WMT or KO or SYY or STZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, SYY: +82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DEO and WMT and KO and SYY and STZ?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DEO is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.