DFDV vs HUT vs MSTR vs MARA

For growth investors, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is the stronger pick with 38. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Analysts rate Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Hut 8 Corp.

(HUT) delivered a total return of +296. 0%, compared to -59. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +855. 6% versus MARA's -51. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

59β versus Hut 8 Corp. 's 4. 51β — meaning HUT is approximately 74% more volatile than MSTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DeFi Development Corp. (DFDV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is pulling ahead at 38. 2% versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DeFi Development Corp. grew EPS 38. 8% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DFDV leads at 2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

DeFi Development Corp.

(DFDV) is the more profitable company, earning -129. 9% net margin versus -1499. 6% for Hut 8 Corp. — meaning it keeps -129. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MARA leads at -90. 6% versus -21. 0% for HUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DFDV leads at 98. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DFDV: 486.

9% to $25. 00.

In this comparison, MSTR (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. DFDV, HUT, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

7% yield, +855. 6% 10Y return). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSTR: +855. 6%, MARA: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (DFDV (Technology) and HUT (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: DFDV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. MSTR pays a dividend while DFDV, HUT, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.