Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DFDV vs HUT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DFDV
DeFi Development Corp.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$118M
5Y Perf.+77.5%
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.22B
5Y Perf.+468.4%
MSTR
Strategy Inc

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$60.05B
5Y Perf.+310.7%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.-26.9%
COIN
Coinbase Global, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50.96B
5Y Perf.+95.7%

DFDV vs HUT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DFDV logoDFDV
HUT logoHUT
MSTR logoMSTR
MARA logoMARA
COIN logoCOIN
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureFinancial - Capital MarketsSoftware - ApplicationFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Market Cap$118M$11.22B$60.05B$4.83B$50.96B
Revenue (TTM)$8M$15M$490M$907M$7.18B
Net Income (TTM)$70M$-312M$-12.36B$-1.31B$801M
Gross Margin98.3%-6.1%68.1%-47.7%74.6%
Operating Margin11.7%-21.0%94.2%-90.6%20.0%
Forward P/E2.4x66.1x
Total Debt$14K$429M$8.28B$3.65B$7.83B
Cash & Equiv.$3M$45M$2.30B$547M$11.29B

DFDV vs HUT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COINLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DFDV
HUT
MSTR
MARA
COIN
StockJul 23May 26Return
DeFi Development Co… (DFDV)100177.5+77.5%
Hut 8 Corp. (HUT)100568.4+468.4%
Strategy Inc (MSTR)100410.7+310.7%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)10073.1-26.9%
Coinbase Global, In… (COIN)100195.7+95.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DFDV vs HUT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MSTR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. DeFi Development Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. HUT and MARA also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
DFDV
DeFi Development Corp.
The Growth Play

DFDV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 4.8%, EPS growth 38.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.0%
  • 9.3% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
  • 47.1% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC -249.5% vs -9.9%
Best for: growth exposure
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.
The Banking Pick

HUT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +7.0% vs MSTR's -54.2%
Best for: momentum
MSTR
Strategy Inc
The Income Pick

MSTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.59, yield 0.7%
  • 8.6% 10Y total return vs HUT's 462.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.59, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 5.62x
  • Beta 2.59, yield 0.7%, current ratio 5.62x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs HUT's -90.7%
Best for: growth
COIN
Coinbase Global, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, COIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMARA logoMARA38.2% NII/revenue growth vs HUT's -90.7%
ValueMSTR logoMSTRLower P/E (2.4x vs 66.1x)
Quality / MarginsDFDV logoDFDV9.3% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
Stability / SafetyMSTR logoMSTRBeta 2.59 vs HUT's 4.51, lower leverage
DividendsMSTR logoMSTR0.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HUT logoHUT+7.0% vs MSTR's -54.2%
Efficiency (ROA)DFDV logoDFDV47.1% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC -249.5% vs -9.9%

DFDV vs HUT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

DFDVDeFi Development Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

HUTHut 8 Corp.
FY 2025
High Performance Computing, Colocation And Cloud
86.1%$202M
Power
9.9%$23M
Digital Infrastructure
4.1%$10M
MSTRStrategy Inc
FY 2025
Product Licenses And Subscription Services
50.0%$215M
Subscription And Circulation
40.8%$176M
License
9.2%$40M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
COINCoinbase Global, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Servicing, Consumer, Net
47.9%$3.3B
Subscription and Circulation, Stablecoin
19.5%$1.3B
Subscription and Circulation, Blockchain Infrastructure Service
9.8%$677M
Subscription and Circulation, Other
8.0%$555M
Bank Servicing, Institutional
6.9%$480M
Other Revenue
4.3%$298M
Bank Servicing, Other
3.6%$253M

DFDV vs HUT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDFDVLAGGINGCOIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DFDV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

COIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 954.1x DFDV's $8M. DFDV is the more profitable business, keeping 9.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.2%. On growth, DFDV holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricDFDV logoDFDVDeFi Development …HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8M$15M$490M$907M$7.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$88M-$389M$480M$627M$202M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$70M-$312M-$12.4B-$1.3B$801M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$892M$7.6B-$312M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+98.3%-6.1%+68.1%-47.7%+74.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.7%-21.0%+94.2%-90.6%+20.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.3%-15.0%-25.2%-144.6%+17.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-96.0%-22.7%+15.5%-34.4%+33.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.5%+11.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.1%-52.3%-132.0%-4.8%-7.2%
DFDV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MSTR leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricDFDV logoDFDVDeFi Development …HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …
Market CapShares × price$118M$11.2B$60.1B$4.8B$51.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$116M$11.6B$66.0B$7.9B$47.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.26x-47.28x-11.81x-3.44x43.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.37x66.07x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.86x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.25x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue56.24x743.95x125.83x5.32x7.10x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share11.88x6.31x1.04x1.30x3.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.00x
MSTR leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DFDV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

DFDV delivers a 85.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $85 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. DFDV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DFDV scores 4/9 vs HUT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricDFDV logoDFDVDeFi Development …HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+85.1%-17.7%-24.1%-30.5%+5.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+47.1%-11.2%-19.4%-17.1%+2.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.5%-13.8%-9.9%-9.0%+5.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-61.3%-17.0%-12.6%-12.1%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–942334
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.25x0.16x1.05x0.53x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M$384M$6.0B$3.1B-$3.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$45M$2.3B$547M$11.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13,933$429M$8.3B$3.6B$7.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense25.03x-9.18x9.05x4.73x16.97x
DFDV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HUT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HUT five years ago would be worth $39,601 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,054 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, HUT leads with a +699.2% total return vs MSTR's -54.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUT at 124.4% vs DFDV's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDFDV logoDFDVDeFi Development …HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-20.2%+97.3%+14.4%+28.2%-18.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-53.4%+699.2%-54.2%-4.7%-1.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.5%+1030.5%+510.2%+36.1%+232.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.5%+296.0%+189.8%-59.5%-26.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.5%+462.4%+855.6%-51.6%-41.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.8%+124.4%+82.7%+10.8%+49.2%
HUT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HUT and MSTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MSTR is the less volatile stock with a 2.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUT's 4.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUT currently trades 90.9% from its 52-week high vs DFDV's 7.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDFDV logoDFDVDeFi Development …HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.92x4.51x2.59x3.11x3.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$53.88$111.33$457.22$23.45$444.65
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.96$12.45$104.17$6.66$139.36
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+7.9%+90.9%+39.3%+54.2%+43.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.682.568.869.653.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.0M4.6M18.8M47.6M10.8M
Evenly matched — HUT and MSTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MSTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: HUT as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", COIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 486.9% upside for DFDV (target: $25) vs -22.4% for HUT (target: $79). MSTR is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricDFDV logoDFDVDeFi Development …HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00$78.50$280.83$16.13$243.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts15291937
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.0%+1.6%
MSTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

DFDV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MSTR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallDeFi Development Corp. (DFDV)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DFDV vs HUT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DFDV or HUT or MSTR or MARA or COIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is the stronger pick with 38. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) offers the better valuation at 43. 4x trailing P/E (66. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DFDV or HUT or MSTR or MARA or COIN?

On forward P/E, Strategy Inc is actually cheaper at 2.

4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DFDV or HUT or MSTR or MARA or COIN?

Over the past 5 years, Hut 8 Corp.

(HUT) delivered a total return of +296. 0%, compared to -59. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +855. 6% versus MARA's -51. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DFDV or HUT or MSTR or MARA or COIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

59β versus Hut 8 Corp. 's 4. 51β — meaning HUT is approximately 74% more volatile than MSTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DeFi Development Corp. (DFDV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — DFDV or HUT or MSTR or MARA or COIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is pulling ahead at 38. 2% versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DeFi Development Corp. grew EPS 38. 8% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DFDV leads at 2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — DFDV or HUT or MSTR or MARA or COIN?

Coinbase Global, Inc.

(COIN) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -1499. 6% for Hut 8 Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COIN leads at 20. 0% versus -21. 0% for HUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DFDV leads at 98. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is DFDV or HUT or MSTR or MARA or COIN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Strategy Inc (MSTR) trades at 2.

4x forward P/E versus 66. 1x for Coinbase Global, Inc. — 63. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DFDV: 486. 9% to $25. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — DFDV or HUT or MSTR or MARA or COIN?

In this comparison, MSTR (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. DFDV, HUT, MARA, COIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is DFDV or HUT or MSTR or MARA or COIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

7% yield, +855. 6% 10Y return). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSTR: +855. 6%, MARA: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between DFDV and HUT and MSTR and MARA and COIN?

These companies operate in different sectors (DFDV (Technology) and HUT (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services) and COIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: DFDV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MSTR pays a dividend while DFDV, HUT, MARA, COIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

DFDV

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 323%
  • Net Margin > 559%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSTR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COIN

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform DFDV and HUT and MSTR and MARA and COIN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(DFDV: 647.6% · HUT: -90.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.