Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DK vs CLMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
DK vs CLMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $2.76B | $2.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.73B | $4.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-51M | $-37M |
| Gross Margin | 6.6% | 8.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | 4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 451.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.35B | $2.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $626M | $38M |
DK vs CLMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delek US Holdings, … (DK) | 100 | 228.8 | +128.8% |
| Calumet, Inc. (CLMT) | 100 | 1342.4 | +1242.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DK vs CLMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 2.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 0.82x
- Beta 0.33, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.82x
CLMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 0.2%, EPS growth -5.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs DK's 253.9%
- 0.2% revenue growth vs DK's -9.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.2% revenue growth vs DK's -9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 451.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.5% margin vs CLMT's -0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs CLMT's 0.40 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +229.9% vs CLMT's +208.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.7% ROA vs CLMT's -1.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs 0.3% |
DK vs CLMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DK vs CLMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DK and CLMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DK is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.7B annually — 2.7x CLMT's $4.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -0.5% (DK) to -0.9% (CLMT).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.7B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $754M | $256M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$51M | -$37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $479M | -$76M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +8.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | -0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.1% | +4.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DK leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DK's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLMT's 33.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $5.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -118.42x | -12.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.92x | 450.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.91x | 33.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.99x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 125.36x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DK scores 5/9 vs CLMT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.13x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.7B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $626M | $38M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.19x | 0.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DK and CLMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLMT five years ago would be worth $54,160 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,812 for DK. Over the past 12 months, DK leads with a +229.9% total return vs CLMT's +208.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DK at 31.1% vs CLMT's 25.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +52.8% | +76.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +229.9% | +208.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.1% | +98.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.1% | +441.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +253.9% | +743.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.1% | +25.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DK and CLMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DK is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLMT's 0.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 0.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.50 | $36.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.29 | $11.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.4 | 68.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
DK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DK as "Hold" and CLMT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -1.5% upside for DK (target: $44) vs -10.1% for CLMT (target: $31). DK is the only dividend payer here at 2.27% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.33 | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | 0.0% |
DK leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
DK vs CLMT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DK or CLMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Calumet, Inc.
(CLMT) is the stronger pick with 0. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK). Analysts rate Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK) a "Hold" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DK or CLMT?
Over the past 5 years, Calumet, Inc.
(CLMT) delivered a total return of +441. 6%, compared to +98. 1% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLMT returned +743. 5% versus DK's +253. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DK or CLMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Delek US Holdings, Inc.
(DK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Calumet, Inc. 's 0. 40β — meaning CLMT is approximately 22% more volatile than DK relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — DK or CLMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Calumet, Inc.
(CLMT) is pulling ahead at 0. 2% versus -9. 5% for Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Delek US Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 95. 7% year-over-year, compared to -552. 5% for Calumet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLMT leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DK or CLMT?
Delek US Holdings, Inc.
(DK) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 2% net margin versus -5. 3% for Calumet, Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DK leads at 3. 7% versus 0. 2% for CLMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLMT leads at 5. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is DK or CLMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Delek US Holdings, Inc.
(DK) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 451. 0x for Calumet, Inc. — 439. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DK: -1. 5% to $44. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — DK or CLMT?
In this comparison, DK (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CLMT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is DK or CLMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Delek US Holdings, Inc.
(DK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 2. 3% yield, +253. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DK: +253. 9%, CLMT: +743. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between DK and CLMT?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
DK pays a dividend while CLMT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.